From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/25] Don't resume new threads if scheduler-locking is in effect
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 20:50:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <834jznzgfw.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <65b0807a-67b2-04a0-c82e-09209d8fc176@palves.net> (message from Pedro Alves on Mon, 11 Jul 2022 18:48:19 +0100)
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> From: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 18:48:19 +0100
>
> > But that is too far: it comes after you tell how the replay mode
> > behaves, which is a separate issue. So if you want to say it once for
> > both ON and STEP values, I suggest to say something like
> >
> > Both the @code{on} and @code{step} settings hold stopped any new
> > threads created by the resumed thread.
> >
> > before you describe how the rep[lay mode behaves.
> >
>
> I don't see it as a separate issue. The last sentence just before mine says:
>
> "The @code{replay} mode behaves like @code{off} in record mode and like
> @code{on} in replay mode."
>
> I.e., the scheduler is locked in replay mode. This is another case of
> scheduler-locking being in effect.
Fine, but is something wrong with the text I proposed?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-11 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-20 22:53 [PATCH 00/25] Step over thread clone and thread exit Pedro Alves
2022-06-20 22:53 ` [PATCH 01/25] Don't use pthread_mutex_t in gdb.base/step-over-clone.c Pedro Alves
2022-07-13 21:35 ` Pedro Alves
2022-06-20 22:53 ` [PATCH 02/25] displaced step: pass down target_waitstatus instead of gdb_signal Pedro Alves
2022-06-20 22:53 ` [PATCH 03/25] linux-nat: introduce pending_status_str Pedro Alves
2022-06-20 22:53 ` [PATCH 04/25] Step over clone syscall w/ breakpoint, TARGET_WAITKIND_THREAD_CLONED Pedro Alves
2022-06-20 22:53 ` [PATCH 05/25] Support clone events in the remote protocol Pedro Alves
2022-06-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 06/25] Thread options & clone events (core + remote) Pedro Alves
2022-06-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 07/25] Thread options & clone events (native Linux) Pedro Alves
2022-06-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 08/25] Thread options & clone events (Linux GDBserver) Pedro Alves
2022-06-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 09/25] gdbserver: Hide and don't detach pending clone children Pedro Alves
2022-06-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 10/25] Remove gdb/19675 kfails (displaced stepping + clone) Pedro Alves
2022-06-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 11/25] Add test for stepping over clone syscall Pedro Alves
2022-06-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 12/25] all-stop/synchronous RSP support thread-exit events Pedro Alves
2022-06-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 13/25] Introduce GDB_TO_EXIT thread option, fix step-over-thread-exit Pedro Alves
2022-06-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 14/25] Implement GDB_TO_EXIT support for Linux GDBserver Pedro Alves
2022-06-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 15/25] Implement GDB_TO_EXIT support for native Linux Pedro Alves
2022-06-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 16/25] gdb: clear step over information on thread exit (PR gdb/27338) Pedro Alves
2022-06-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 17/25] stop_all_threads: (re-)enable async before waiting for stops Pedro Alves
2022-06-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 18/25] gdbserver: Queue no-resumed event after thread exit Pedro Alves
2022-06-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 19/25] Don't resume new threads if scheduler-locking is in effect Pedro Alves
2022-06-21 11:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-07-11 14:20 ` Pedro Alves
2022-07-11 15:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-07-11 16:09 ` Pedro Alves
2022-07-11 16:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-07-11 16:38 ` Pedro Alves
2022-07-11 17:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-07-11 17:48 ` Pedro Alves
2022-07-11 17:50 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2022-07-11 18:18 ` Pedro Alves
2022-07-11 18:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-07-11 19:39 ` Pedro Alves
2022-07-12 16:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-07-12 17:14 ` Pedro Alves
2022-06-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 20/25] Tighten gdb.threads/no-unwaited-for-left.exp regexps Pedro Alves
2022-07-13 21:32 ` Pedro Alves
2022-06-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 21/25] Report thread exit event for leader if reporting thread exit events Pedro Alves
2022-06-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 22/25] Ignore failure to read PC when resuming Pedro Alves
2022-06-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 23/25] gdb/testsuite/lib/my-syscalls.S: Refactor new SYSCALL macro Pedro Alves
2022-06-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 24/25] Testcases for stepping over thread exit syscall (PR gdb/27338) Pedro Alves
2022-06-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 25/25] Document remote clone events, and QThreadOptions packet Pedro Alves
2022-06-21 12:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-07-11 15:19 ` Pedro Alves
2022-07-11 16:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-07-11 16:54 ` Pedro Alves
2022-07-11 17:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=834jznzgfw.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=pedro@palves.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).