public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PING] [PATCH 0/2] Fix gdb.arch/amd64-gs_base.exp test on FreeBSD
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 12:04:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jzzx8xlz.fsf@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <65c700e2-cfe9-6ffe-a850-cb6a5ada1663@FreeBSD.org> (John Baldwin's message of "Fri, 3 Mar 2023 09:58:38 -0800")

>>>>> "John" == John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> writes:

John> On 2/17/23 12:02 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>> The gdb.arch/amd64-gs_base.exp test was failing on FreeBSD as it had
>> some Linux-specific assumptions.  While looking at this I also found
>> that Linux/amd64 treats the fs_base and gs_base as "system" registers,
>> but FreeBSD did not.  I originally started by moving the logic from
>> Linux/amd64 for these registers into i386_register_reggroup_p so it
>> would be consistent across all OS ABIs, but I think it would be better
>> to treat these registers as general registers instead which is what
>> patch 2 does.
>> John Baldwin (2):
>> gdb.arch/amd64-gs_base.exp: Support non-Linux.
>> amd64-linux-tdep: Don't treat fs_base and gs_base as system registers.
>> gdb/amd64-linux-tdep.c                   |  4 +---
>> gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-gs_base.exp | 10 ++++------
>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

John> Ping.

These make sense to me.  Thank you.

Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>

Tom

      reply	other threads:[~2023-03-03 19:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-17 20:02 John Baldwin
2023-02-17 20:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] gdb.arch/amd64-gs_base.exp: Support non-Linux John Baldwin
2023-02-17 20:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] amd64-linux-tdep: Don't treat fs_base and gs_base as system registers John Baldwin
2023-03-03 17:58 ` [PING] [PATCH 0/2] Fix gdb.arch/amd64-gs_base.exp test on FreeBSD John Baldwin
2023-03-03 19:04   ` Tom Tromey [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87jzzx8xlz.fsf@tromey.com \
    --to=tom@tromey.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jhb@FreeBSD.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).