From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>
To: Guinevere Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] process-dies-while-detaching.exp: Exit early if GDB misses sync breakpoint
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2023 19:50:40 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pm1um27z.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82422697-8aa9-d56a-8aa0-2c60703d5276@redhat.com>
Guinevere Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com> writes:
> On 29/09/2023 19:53, Thiago Jung Bauermann via Gdb-patches wrote:
>> I'm seeing a lot of variability in the failures of
>> gdb.threads/process-dies-while-detaching.exp on aarch64-linux. On this
>> platform, a problem yet to be investigated causes GDB to miss the _exit
>> breakpoint. What happens next is random because after missing that
>> breakpoint, GDB is out of sync with the inferior. This causes the tests
>> following that point in the testcase to fail in a random way.
>>
>> In this scenario it's better to exit the testcase early to avoid random
>> results in the testsuite.
> Thanks for working on this test, it has been driving me up the wall for a while!
Yes, this caused a few false positives in our CI. :-/
>> We are relying on gdb_continue_to_breakpoint to return the result of
>> gdb_test_multiple. This is already the case because in Tcl the return
>> value of a function is the return value of the last command it runs. But
>> change gdb_continue_to_breakpoint to explicitly return this value, to make
>> it clear this is the intended behaviour.
> I like this change, since I didn't actually know that this was TCL's behavior!
Tcl works in mysterious ways. :-)
>> Tested on aarch64-linux.
>
> I tested on x86_64 and I see no regressions.
>
> Tested-By: Guinevere Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
Thank you for testing!
> I hope this gets approved soon!
Me too. :-)
--
Thiago
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-04 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-29 17:53 Thiago Jung Bauermann
2023-10-04 10:55 ` Guinevere Larsen
2023-10-04 22:50 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann [this message]
2023-10-06 17:05 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-10-06 20:41 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pm1um27z.fsf@linaro.org \
--to=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
--cc=blarsen@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).