public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandra Petlanova Hajkova <ahajkova@redhat.com>
To: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] [gdb/symtab] Factor out m_die_range_map usage
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 22:33:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJVr-EO3gt913bOmSBbrU49YYO84puZdC7wpHBZhpTCWdpZN8w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231002125051.29911-2-tdevries@suse.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1216 bytes --]

On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 2:53 PM Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches <
gdb-patches@sourceware.org> wrote:

> Factor out usage of cooked_indexer::m_die_range_map into new class
> parent_map
> with member functions find_parent and set_parent.
>
> Tested on x86_64-linux.
> ---
>  gdb/dwarf2/cooked-index.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  gdb/dwarf2/read.c         | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
>  2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
>
> It seems breakpoint-locs.exp test does not fail anymore with this patch
applied on ppc64le Fedora Rawhide. But I wouldn't expect that
from just a factoring out. Is that a coincidence?
< Breakpoint 1 at 0x10010208: file
/root/build/gdb/testsuite/../../../binutils-g
db/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/breakpoint-locs.h, line 23.
< (gdb) FAIL: gdb.cp/breakpoint-locs.exp: break N1::C1::baz
< testcase
/root/build/gdb/testsuite/../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/breakpoint-locs.exp
completed in 0 seconds
---
> Breakpoint 1 at 0x10010208: N1::C1::baz. (2 locations)
> (gdb) PASS: gdb.cp/breakpoint-locs.exp: break N1::C1::baz
> testcase
/root/build/gdb/testsuite/../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/breakpoint-locs.exp
completed in 1 seconds

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-09 20:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-02 12:50 [PATCH 00/13] [gdb/symtab, cc-with-dwz] Fix gdb.cp/breakpoint-locs.exp Tom de Vries
2023-10-02 12:50 ` [PATCH 01/13] [gdb/symtab] Factor out m_die_range_map usage Tom de Vries
2023-10-09 20:33   ` Alexandra Petlanova Hajkova [this message]
2023-10-09 21:43     ` Tom de Vries
2023-10-20 19:50   ` Tom Tromey
2023-11-30 12:55     ` Tom de Vries
2023-10-02 12:50 ` [PATCH 02/13] [gdb/symtab] Check effect in parent_map::set_parent Tom de Vries
2023-10-20 19:51   ` Tom Tromey
2023-11-30 14:05     ` Tom de Vries
2023-10-02 12:50 ` [PATCH 03/13] [gdb/symtab] Handle nullptr parent " Tom de Vries
2023-10-02 12:50 ` [PATCH 04/13] [gdb/symtab] Add parent_map::dump Tom de Vries
2023-10-10  9:05   ` Alexandra Petlanova Hajkova
2023-10-20 19:51   ` Tom Tromey
2023-10-02 12:50 ` [PATCH 05/13] [gdb/symtab] Factor out m_deferred_entries usage Tom de Vries
2023-10-02 12:50 ` [PATCH 06/13] [gdb/symtab] Add debug_handle_deferred_entries Tom de Vries
2023-10-02 12:50 ` [PATCH 07/13] [gdb/symtab] Resolve deferred entries, inter-shard case Tom de Vries
2023-10-20 20:11   ` Tom Tromey
2023-12-10  8:10   ` Tom de Vries
2023-10-02 12:50 ` [PATCH 08/13] [gdb/testsuite] Add gdb.dwarf2/forward-spec-inter-cu.exp Tom de Vries
2023-10-02 12:50 ` [PATCH 09/13] [gdb/symtab] Keep track of processed DIEs in shard Tom de Vries
2023-10-22 11:00   ` Alexandra Petlanova Hajkova
2023-12-08 12:09   ` Tom de Vries
2023-10-02 12:50 ` [PATCH 10/13] [gdb/symtab] Resolve deferred entries, intra-shard case Tom de Vries
2023-10-02 12:50 ` [PATCH 11/13] [gdb/symtab] Don't defer backward refs, inter-cu " Tom de Vries
2023-10-02 12:50 ` [PATCH 12/13] [gdb/testsuite] Add gdb.dwarf2/backward-spec-inter-cu.exp Tom de Vries
2023-10-02 12:50 ` [PATCH 13/13] [gdb/symtab] Add DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine entries in the cooked index for c++ Tom de Vries
2023-10-16 11:40 ` [PING][PATCH 00/13] [gdb/symtab, cc-with-dwz] Fix gdb.cp/breakpoint-locs.exp Tom de Vries

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJVr-EO3gt913bOmSBbrU49YYO84puZdC7wpHBZhpTCWdpZN8w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ahajkova@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tdevries@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).