From: "Jan Vraný" <Jan.Vrany@labware.com>
To: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
"tom@tromey.com" <tom@tromey.com>
Cc: "simark@simark.ca" <simark@simark.ca>,
"luis.machado@arm.com" <luis.machado@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb: fix command lookup in execute_command ()
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 18:48:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adf55b117d22527d1bf1b012b9bf3173cf51a6b1.camel@labware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878rjbfinm.fsf@tromey.com>
On Tue, 2022-12-13 at 08:05 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > > > > > "Jan" == Jan Vrany via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:
>
> Jan> The below patch should fix this case - with it on my system
> Jan> gdb.base/define.exp passes.
>
> Jan> Alternatively I may just revert the commit until better solution
> Jan> is found.
>
> This patch looks ok to me, but could you say whether you ran all the
> tests or just define.exp? Given the history I think a full regression
> test is warranted.
I did use try-build which succeeded (build #28) but it seems to me it
runs only very limited number of tests.
I did run all of gdb.base and did not spot any new regression compared
to master with my (previous, broken) patch reverted. I did not run more
than gdb.base mainly because just gdb.base takes about an hour on my machine.
Also I get weird intermittent failures when running testsuite.
Jan
>
> thanks,
> Tom
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-13 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-08 14:20 [PATCH] gdb: fix possible use-after-free when executing commands Jan Vrany
2022-12-09 17:55 ` Tom Tromey
2022-12-12 15:05 ` Luis Machado
2022-12-12 15:08 ` Jan Vraný
2022-12-12 15:09 ` Luis Machado
2022-12-13 11:22 ` [PATCH] gdb: fix command lookup in execute_command () Jan Vrany
2022-12-13 15:05 ` Tom Tromey
2022-12-13 16:43 ` Simon Marchi
2022-12-13 18:48 ` Jan Vraný [this message]
2022-12-13 19:29 ` Simon Marchi
2022-12-14 11:07 ` [PATCH] gdb: fix command lookup in execute_command () commands" Jan Vrany
2022-12-14 15:35 ` Simon Marchi
2022-12-14 15:41 ` Jan Vraný
2022-12-14 15:59 ` Tom Tromey
2022-12-14 16:01 ` Simon Marchi
2022-12-14 18:05 ` Tom Tromey
2022-12-14 18:30 ` Simon Marchi
2022-12-14 22:01 ` Simon Marchi
2022-12-16 14:07 ` [PATCH] gdb: fix command lookup in execute_command () Jan Vraný
2022-12-16 16:47 ` Simon Marchi
2022-12-19 11:48 ` Jan Vraný
2022-12-19 14:46 ` Tom Tromey
2022-12-19 15:51 ` Jan Vraný
2022-12-20 19:10 ` Tom Tromey
2022-12-14 19:52 ` [PATCH] gdb: fix possible use-after-free when executing commands Simon Marchi
2022-12-14 20:39 ` Jan Vraný
2022-12-14 20:42 ` Simon Marchi
2022-12-15 12:57 ` Jan Vrany
2022-12-15 13:53 ` Simon Marchi
2022-12-15 14:51 ` Jan Vrany
2022-12-15 16:00 ` Simon Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adf55b117d22527d1bf1b012b9bf3173cf51a6b1.camel@labware.com \
--to=jan.vrany@labware.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=luis.machado@arm.com \
--cc=simark@simark.ca \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).