From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@embecosm.com>
To: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Simon Sobisch <simonsobisch@web.de>,
Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>,
Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/8] GDB: Add `NUMBER' completion to `set' integer commands
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 15:24:03 +0100 (BST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2205261518170.10833@tpp.orcam.me.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cf14827d-075e-1860-bb98-fe2e09062332@redhat.com>
Hi Bruno,
> > This just follows the existing logic in `parse_option' and is really a
> > special case. I am inconvinced that there is a benefit from getting the
> > completion broken visibly to the user for the sake of avoiding a manual
> > call in the code. Sorry.
>
> I don't really think `complete set print elements N<tab>` would naturally
> occur, so I don't really think it would break completion from a user
> standpoint. However, I think we can agree to disagree here, since you do away
> with this function later on, and I'm fine with how you decided to work on that
> patch.
If someone, pehaps mistakenly, enters `set print elements N<tab>`, then
the last word will complete to `NUMBER' (and likewise with `complete set
print elements N'), which does not correspond to the syntax supported and
is therefore supposed not to happen.
Maciej
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-26 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-30 10:23 [PATCH v5 0/8] gdb: split array and string limiting options Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] GDB: Remove extraneous full stops from `set' command error messages Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-06-24 14:32 ` Andrew Burgess
2022-06-29 14:29 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] GDB/Python: Use None for `var_zuinteger_unlimited' value set to `unlimited' Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-03-30 10:35 ` Simon Sobisch
2022-03-30 10:40 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-03-30 10:50 ` Simon Sobisch
2022-03-30 11:52 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-06-24 14:40 ` Andrew Burgess
2022-06-29 16:48 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-03-30 10:24 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] GDB: Add `NUMBER' completion to `set' integer commands Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-05-25 18:36 ` Bruno Larsen
2022-05-26 10:09 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-05-26 11:46 ` Bruno Larsen
2022-05-26 14:24 ` Maciej W. Rozycki [this message]
2022-06-24 15:08 ` Andrew Burgess
2022-06-30 14:24 ` [PATCH v6 " Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-06-30 15:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-06-30 18:59 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-06-30 16:01 ` Andrew Burgess
2022-03-30 10:24 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] GDB/testsuite: Tighten `set print elements' error check Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-06-24 15:09 ` Andrew Burgess
2022-06-29 14:29 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-03-30 10:24 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] GDB/testsuite: Add coverage for `print -elements' command Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-06-24 15:57 ` Andrew Burgess
2022-07-07 11:04 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-03-30 10:24 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] GDB: Allow arbitrary keywords in integer set commands Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-03-30 10:42 ` Simon Sobisch
2022-03-30 10:58 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-06-28 14:04 ` Andrew Burgess
2022-08-17 22:03 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-03-30 10:24 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] GDB: Add a character string limiting option Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-03-30 12:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-03-30 10:24 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] GDB/testsuite: Expand for character string limiting options Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-04-13 11:20 ` [PING][PATCH v5 0/8] gdb: split array and " Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-04-13 12:10 ` Simon Sobisch
2022-04-13 12:18 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-04-20 19:17 ` [PING^2][PATCH " Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-04-26 19:57 ` Simon Sobisch
2022-04-27 12:00 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-04-27 12:02 ` [PING^3][PATCH " Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-05-04 10:05 ` [PING^4][PATCH " Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-05-12 21:20 ` [PING^5][PATCH " Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-05-20 10:49 ` [PING^6][PATCH " Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-05-25 15:52 ` [PING^7][PATCH " Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-05-25 19:20 ` [PATCH " Bruno Larsen
2022-06-02 17:55 ` [PING^8][PATCH " Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-06-07 17:23 ` Simon Sobisch
2022-06-15 22:47 ` [PING^9][PATCH " Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-06-22 11:25 ` [PING^10][PATCH " Maciej W. Rozycki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.2205261518170.10833@tpp.orcam.me.uk \
--to=macro@embecosm.com \
--cc=aburgess@redhat.com \
--cc=blarsen@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=simonsobisch@web.de \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).