public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
To: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>,
	Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>,
	gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pedro@palves.net
Cc: marcan@marcan.st
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aarch64: Check for valid inferior thread/regcache before reading pauth registers
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 13:29:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b38626aa-2a08-83ae-22f2-345f321525ee@simark.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ec4d0558-ea88-f765-1bab-edc774178a17@arm.com>


> What would be the outcome of this call when there is no active register cache because the inferior
> has been killed? I think it would assert in find_inferior_pid with a null_ptid.
> 
> aarch64_remove_non_address_bits gets called for any memory access, so we may be in a state where we have
> a valid stopped thread, a valid running thread, core file, no inferiors (just reading symbols/bfd) and so
> on.
> 
> Or were you considering doing a check for inferior_ptid == null_ptid before calling get_thread_regcache?

Yes, a check for inferior_ptid == null_ptid would make sense.  I was
really just thinking about the initial problem, which is
aarch64_remove_non_address_bits being called while processing the event
in thread-db.

Simon

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-17 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-16 10:39 Luis Machado
2023-03-16 15:49 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-03-16 23:15   ` Luis Machado
2023-03-17 17:15     ` Simon Marchi
2023-03-17 17:25       ` Luis Machado
2023-03-17 17:29         ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2023-03-17 17:38           ` Luis Machado
2023-03-20 20:06     ` Andrew Burgess
2023-03-22 10:26       ` Luis Machado
2023-03-23 10:56 ` [PATCH, v2] " Luis Machado
2023-03-23 18:25   ` Kevin Buettner
2023-03-23 18:27     ` Luis Machado
2023-03-23 18:32       ` Luis Machado
2023-03-23 18:39         ` Kevin Buettner
2023-03-24  6:28           ` Luis Machado
2023-03-24  8:19   ` Luis Machado
2023-03-24 13:42     ` Luis Machado

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b38626aa-2a08-83ae-22f2-345f321525ee@simark.ca \
    --to=simark@simark.ca \
    --cc=aburgess@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=luis.machado@arm.com \
    --cc=marcan@marcan.st \
    --cc=pedro@palves.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).