From: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, jimb@codesourcery.com,
mike_wrighton@mentor.com, nathan@codesourcery.com,
abidh@codesourcery.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] Document conventions for describing packet syntax
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 20:01:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc0cb104-db5e-49cb-81ed-d6d7f76cae37@palves.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <867cgtbcih.fsf@gnu.org>
Hi!
On 2024-04-19 16:25, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
>> Cc: Jim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>,
>> Mike Wrighton <mike_wrighton@mentor.com>,
>> Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>,
>> Hafiz Abid Qadeer <abidh@codesourcery.com>
>> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 16:13:31 +0100
>>
>> This comment documents conventions for describing packet syntax in the
>> Overview section.
>
> Thanks.
>
>> +We place optional portions of a packet in @r{[}square brackets@r{]};
>
> This should be in @samp, otherwise the @r parts are redundant and
> won't have any effect.
>
Hmm, if I wrap that in @samp, then it renders as:
We place optional portions of a packet in '[square brackets]'; for example, a template like ‘c [addr]’ describes a packet beginning with the single ASCII character ‘c’, possibly followed by an addr.
Those '' around [square brackets] seem off to me there. The original author must have wanted the
rendered text without the single quotes too, since they didn't use @samp and they certainly
looked at the rendered output back then. So given @r are nops, I think we should just remove them.
That results in:
We place optional portions of a packet in [square brackets]; for example, a template like ‘c [addr]’ describes a packet beginning with the single ASCII character ‘c’, possibly followed by an addr.
which IMHO looks better.
If you dislike that, I noticed that:
https://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/manual/texinfo/html_node/Command-List.html
says:
Square brackets, [ ], indicate optional arguments
We could switch to a similar wording. I kind of like the original better, but
this is a very tiny detail, of course.
Let me know what you think.
Pedro Alves
>> +for example, a template like @samp{c @r{[}@var{addr}@r{]}} describes a
>> +packet beginning with the single ASCII character @samp{c}, possibly
>> +followed by an @var{addr}.
>
> OK with this nit fixed.
>
> Approved-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-22 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-19 15:13 [PATCH 00/12] Fix attach/run failure handling - gdbserver & Windows, document "E.MESSAGE" RSP errors, more Pedro Alves
2024-04-19 15:13 ` [PATCH 01/12] Document conventions for describing packet syntax Pedro Alves
2024-04-19 15:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-04-19 15:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-04-22 19:10 ` Pedro Alves
2024-04-22 19:01 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2024-04-22 19:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-04-19 15:13 ` [PATCH 02/12] Centralize documentation of error and empty RSP responses Pedro Alves
2024-04-19 15:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-04-19 15:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-04-22 19:00 ` Pedro Alves
2024-04-22 19:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-04-19 15:13 ` [PATCH 03/12] Document "E.MESSAGE" RSP errors Pedro Alves
2024-04-19 15:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-04-22 8:50 ` Andrew Burgess
2024-04-22 19:04 ` Pedro Alves
2024-04-26 19:02 ` Pedro Alves
2024-04-26 19:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-04-29 13:42 ` Andrew Burgess
2024-04-19 15:13 ` [PATCH 04/12] Windows: Fix run/attach hang after bad run/attach Pedro Alves
2024-04-19 18:35 ` Tom Tromey
2024-04-19 15:13 ` [PATCH 05/12] Fix "run" failure handling with GDBserver Pedro Alves
2024-04-19 18:41 ` Tom Tromey
2024-04-19 15:13 ` [PATCH 06/12] Improve vRun error reporting Pedro Alves
2024-04-19 18:43 ` Tom Tromey
2024-04-22 11:32 ` Alexandra Petlanova Hajkova
2024-04-19 15:13 ` [PATCH 07/12] Fix "attach" failure handling with GDBserver Pedro Alves
2024-04-19 18:47 ` Tom Tromey
2024-04-19 15:13 ` [PATCH 08/12] gdbserver: Fix vAttach response when attaching is not supported Pedro Alves
2024-04-19 18:48 ` Tom Tromey
2024-04-19 15:13 ` [PATCH 09/12] gdb_target_is_native -> gdb_protocol_is_native Pedro Alves
2024-04-19 18:50 ` Tom Tromey
2024-05-09 8:47 ` Bernd Edlinger
2024-05-09 9:47 ` Pedro Alves
2024-05-09 11:54 ` Bernd Edlinger
2024-05-09 12:05 ` Pedro Alves
2024-05-09 13:19 ` Bernd Edlinger
2024-05-09 13:31 ` Pedro Alves
2024-05-09 15:01 ` Bernd Edlinger
2024-05-09 15:49 ` Pedro Alves
2024-05-09 18:44 ` Bernd Edlinger
2024-05-10 10:52 ` [pushed] gdb sim testing, set gdb_protocol to "sim" Pedro Alves
2024-04-22 8:25 ` [PATCH 09/12] gdb_target_is_native -> gdb_protocol_is_native Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2024-04-23 12:33 ` Pedro Alves
2024-04-19 15:13 ` [PATCH 10/12] gdb_target_is_remote -> gdb_protocol_is_remote Pedro Alves
2024-04-19 18:56 ` Tom Tromey
2024-04-23 12:30 ` Pedro Alves
2024-04-22 8:30 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2024-04-23 12:47 ` Pedro Alves
2024-04-24 13:48 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2024-04-19 15:13 ` [PATCH 11/12] Eliminate gdb_is_target_remote / gdb_is_target_native & friends Pedro Alves
2024-04-19 18:57 ` Tom Tromey
2024-04-19 15:13 ` [PATCH 12/12] Fix gdb.base/attach.exp --pid test skipping on native-extended-gdbserver Pedro Alves
2024-04-19 18:59 ` Tom Tromey
2024-04-26 20:25 ` [PATCH 00/12] Fix attach/run failure handling - gdbserver & Windows, document "E.MESSAGE" RSP errors, more Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bc0cb104-db5e-49cb-81ed-d6d7f76cae37@palves.net \
--to=pedro@palves.net \
--cc=abidh@codesourcery.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jimb@codesourcery.com \
--cc=mike_wrighton@mentor.com \
--cc=nathan@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).