public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
To: Johnson Sun <j3.soon777@gmail.com>,
	Lancelot SIX <lsix@lancelotsix.com>,
	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] [PR python/29603] Disable out-of-scope watchpoints
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 14:50:34 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c147c484-8b8c-ca10-1c99-4454efe7ea54@simark.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230423095408.7638-1-j3.soon777@gmail.com>

On 4/23/23 05:54, Johnson Sun wrote:
> Currently, when a local software watchpoint goes out of scope, GDB sets
> the watchpoint's disposition to `delete at next stop' and then normal
> stops (i.e., stop and wait for the next GDB command). When GDB normal
> stops, it automatically deletes the breakpoints with their disposition
> set to `delete at next stop'.
> 
> Suppose a Python script decides not to normal stop when a local
> software watchpoint goes out of scope, the watchpoint will not be
> automatically deleted even when its disposition is set to
> `delete at next stop'.
> 
> Since GDB single-steps the program and tests the watched expression
> after each instruction, not deleting the watchpoint causes the
> watchpoint to be hit many more times than it should, as reported in
> PR python/29603.
> 
> This was happening because the watchpoint is not deleted or disabled
> when going out of scope.
> 
> This commit fixes this issue by disabling the watchpoint when going out
> of scope. It also adds a test to ensure this feature isn't regressed in
> the future.
> 
> Calling `breakpoint_auto_delete' on all kinds of stops (in
> `fetch_inferior_event') seem to solve this issue, but is in fact
> inappropriate, since `breakpoint_auto_delete' goes over all breakpoints
> instead of just going through the bpstat chain (which only contains the
> breakpoints that were hit right now).
> 
> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29603

Hi,

Hmm, re-testing the patch, it now just times out like this:

    (gdb) PASS: gdb.python/py-watchpoint.exp: check modified BP count
    continue
    Continuing.
    Watchpoint Hit: 1
    FAIL: gdb.python/py-watchpoint.exp: run until program stops (timeout)
    python print(bpt.n)

It basically hangs there.  Do you see this?

Simon

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-09 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-25  5:33 [PATCH] [PR python/29603] Fix deletion of Watchpoints Johnson Sun
2022-09-25 18:10 ` Lancelot SIX
2022-10-01  5:20 ` Johnson Sun
2022-10-01  5:27   ` [PATCH v2] [PR python/29603] Disable out-of-scope watchpoints Johnson Sun
2022-10-20 17:57     ` Johnson Sun
2022-10-20 18:11       ` [PATCH v3] " Johnson Sun
2022-11-18 12:17         ` [PING] " Johnson Sun
2022-11-25 15:11           ` [PING^2] " Johnson Sun
2022-12-04 16:45             ` [PING^3] " Johnson Sun
2022-12-12 21:44               ` [PING^4] " Johnson Sun
2022-12-20 22:08                 ` [PING^5] " Johnson Sun
2022-12-27 16:40                   ` [PING^6] " Johnson Sun
2023-01-12 18:34                     ` [PING^7] " Johnson Sun
2023-01-13 15:40         ` Simon Marchi
2023-01-23 10:15           ` Johnson Sun
2023-02-18 16:26             ` [PING] " Johnson Sun
2023-02-26  6:16               ` [RFC] " Johnson Sun
2023-03-12 17:24                 ` [PING] " Johnson Sun
2023-03-13 16:00             ` Simon Marchi
2023-03-23 18:25               ` Johnson Sun
2023-03-23 18:31                 ` [PATCH v4] " Johnson Sun
2023-04-09 20:47                   ` Johnson Sun
2023-04-09 20:49                     ` [PING] " Johnson Sun
2023-04-17 18:18                       ` [PING^2] " Johnson Sun
2023-04-17 18:56                   ` Simon Marchi
2023-04-23  9:46                     ` Johnson Sun
2023-04-23  9:54                       ` [PATCH v5] " Johnson Sun
2023-05-06 19:06                         ` [PING] " Johnson Sun
2023-05-09 18:50                         ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2023-05-10 17:22                           ` Johnson Sun
2023-05-11  2:08                             ` Simon Marchi
2023-05-11 15:46                               ` [PATCH v6] " Johnson Sun
2023-05-11 16:09                                 ` Simon Marchi
2023-05-11 15:50                               ` [PATCH v5] " Johnson Sun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c147c484-8b8c-ca10-1c99-4454efe7ea54@simark.ca \
    --to=simark@simark.ca \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=j3.soon777@gmail.com \
    --cc=lsix@lancelotsix.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).