public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
To: Johnson Sun <j3.soon777@gmail.com>,
	LancelotSIX <lsix@lancelotsix.com>,
	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] [PR python/29603] Disable out-of-scope watchpoints
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 22:08:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f46d6ca1-887a-54ea-92c0-5f746b149c49@simark.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1b0edc1f-0783-e262-2138-6982a18ddf97@gmail.com>

On 5/10/23 13:22, Johnson Sun wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I just applied the patch to commit 39453f9d8cf03b382d34f3548706f1ae5916e34e, and tested with the following commands on a clean Ubuntu 22.04 LTS machine:
> 
>     make check TESTS="gdb.python/py-watchpoint.exp"
>     make check TESTS="gdb.python/py-watchpoint.exp" RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=native-gdbserver"
>     make check TESTS="gdb.python/py-watchpoint.exp" RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=native-extended-gdbserver"
> 
> all 3 commands above passed the tests (10/10) on my machine.
> 
> I'm unsure why the test times out on your machine. Could you provide information regarding the base commit that was used and the operating system installed?

I just retested on latest master as of now (38b95a529385).

Looking at the output of "set debug infrun", it looks like the program
is making progress, just that it's really slow, since GDB is single
stepping all instructions due to the software watchpoint.

Is the printf necessary for the test?  If not, we can remove it.  If the
loop executes just a few instructions, the program should execute
relatively quickly, even if single stepping all the way through.

Simon

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-11  2:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-25  5:33 [PATCH] [PR python/29603] Fix deletion of Watchpoints Johnson Sun
2022-09-25 18:10 ` Lancelot SIX
2022-10-01  5:20 ` Johnson Sun
2022-10-01  5:27   ` [PATCH v2] [PR python/29603] Disable out-of-scope watchpoints Johnson Sun
2022-10-20 17:57     ` Johnson Sun
2022-10-20 18:11       ` [PATCH v3] " Johnson Sun
2022-11-18 12:17         ` [PING] " Johnson Sun
2022-11-25 15:11           ` [PING^2] " Johnson Sun
2022-12-04 16:45             ` [PING^3] " Johnson Sun
2022-12-12 21:44               ` [PING^4] " Johnson Sun
2022-12-20 22:08                 ` [PING^5] " Johnson Sun
2022-12-27 16:40                   ` [PING^6] " Johnson Sun
2023-01-12 18:34                     ` [PING^7] " Johnson Sun
2023-01-13 15:40         ` Simon Marchi
2023-01-23 10:15           ` Johnson Sun
2023-02-18 16:26             ` [PING] " Johnson Sun
2023-02-26  6:16               ` [RFC] " Johnson Sun
2023-03-12 17:24                 ` [PING] " Johnson Sun
2023-03-13 16:00             ` Simon Marchi
2023-03-23 18:25               ` Johnson Sun
2023-03-23 18:31                 ` [PATCH v4] " Johnson Sun
2023-04-09 20:47                   ` Johnson Sun
2023-04-09 20:49                     ` [PING] " Johnson Sun
2023-04-17 18:18                       ` [PING^2] " Johnson Sun
2023-04-17 18:56                   ` Simon Marchi
2023-04-23  9:46                     ` Johnson Sun
2023-04-23  9:54                       ` [PATCH v5] " Johnson Sun
2023-05-06 19:06                         ` [PING] " Johnson Sun
2023-05-09 18:50                         ` Simon Marchi
2023-05-10 17:22                           ` Johnson Sun
2023-05-11  2:08                             ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2023-05-11 15:46                               ` [PATCH v6] " Johnson Sun
2023-05-11 16:09                                 ` Simon Marchi
2023-05-11 15:50                               ` [PATCH v5] " Johnson Sun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f46d6ca1-887a-54ea-92c0-5f746b149c49@simark.ca \
    --to=simark@simark.ca \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=j3.soon777@gmail.com \
    --cc=lsix@lancelotsix.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).