public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] gdb: relax requirement for the map_failed stap probe to be present
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 15:09:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <daf50f6f4ee3d18635d72cdbe5af189b85f3010b.1669129770.git.aburgess@redhat.com> (raw)

From glibc 2.35 and later, the "map_failed" stap probe is no longer
included in glibc.  The removal of the probe looks like an accident,
but it was caused by a glibc commit which meant that the "map_failed"
probe could no longer be reached; the compiler than helpfully
optimised out the probe.

In GDB, in solib-svr4.c, we have a list of probes that we look for
related to the shared library loading detection.  If any of these
probes are missing then GDB will fall back to the non-probe based
mechanism for detecting shared library loading.  The "map_failed"
probe is include in the list of required probes.

This means that on glibc 2.35 (or later) systems, GDB is going to
always fall back to the non-probes based mechanism for detecting
shared library loading.

I raised a glibc bug to discuss this issue:

  https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29818

But, whatever the ultimate decision from the glibc team, given there
are version of glibc in the wild without the "map_failed" probe, we
probably should update GDB to handle this situation.

The "map_failed" probe is already a little strange, very early
versions of glibc didn't include this probe, so, in some cases, if
this probe is missing GDB is happy to ignore it.  In this commit I
just expand this logic to make the "map_failed" probe fully optional.

With this commit in place, then, when using a glibc 2.35 or later
system, GDB will once again use the stap probes for shared library
detection.
---
 gdb/solib-svr4.c | 13 +++++++++----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/solib-svr4.c b/gdb/solib-svr4.c
index 6acaf87960b..87cd06f251a 100644
--- a/gdb/solib-svr4.c
+++ b/gdb/solib-svr4.c
@@ -2205,10 +2205,15 @@ svr4_find_and_create_probe_breakpoints (svr4_info *info,
 
       probes[i] = find_probes_in_objfile (os->objfile, "rtld", name);
 
-      /* The "map_failed" probe did not exist in early
-	 versions of the probes code in which the probes'
-	 names were prefixed with "rtld_".  */
-      if (with_prefix && streq (name, "rtld_map_failed"))
+      /* The "map_failed" probe did not exist in early versions of the
+	 probes code in which the probes' names were prefixed with
+	 "rtld_".
+
+	 Additionally, the "map_failed" probe was accidentally removed
+	 from glibc 2.35 and later, when changes in glibc meant the probe
+	 could no longer be reached.  In this case the probe name doesn't
+	 have the "rtld_" prefix.  */
+      if (streq (probe_info[i].name, "map_failed"))
 	continue;
 
       /* Ensure at least one probe for the current name was found.  */

base-commit: 84f9fbe90e5429adb9dee68f04f44c92fa9e2345
-- 
2.25.4


             reply	other threads:[~2022-11-22 15:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-22 15:09 Andrew Burgess [this message]
2022-11-22 15:31 ` Simon Marchi
2022-11-24 10:46   ` Andrew Burgess
2022-11-24 15:10     ` Simon Marchi
2022-11-24 16:13     ` Lancelot SIX
2022-11-28 15:47     ` Pedro Alves
2022-11-28 17:18     ` Andrew Burgess
2022-11-29  8:27       ` Luis Machado
2022-11-29  8:38         ` Luis Machado
2022-12-05 10:09           ` Andrew Burgess
2022-12-05 10:27             ` Luis Machado
2022-12-05 12:04               ` Andrew Burgess
2022-12-05 12:55                 ` Luis Machado
2022-11-22 15:33 ` Lancelot SIX
2022-11-24 11:39   ` Andrew Burgess

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=daf50f6f4ee3d18635d72cdbe5af189b85f3010b.1669129770.git.aburgess@redhat.com \
    --to=aburgess@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).