public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
To: Lancelot SIX <lsix@lancelotsix.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb: use gdb_test_multiple in gdb_breakpoint
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 14:05:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e3fa2940-51b3-d7ae-3309-a280c219910f@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230104180248.4bumo5mm4vvpjx6c@ubuntu.lan>



On 1/4/23 13:02, Lancelot SIX wrote:
> Something like this should fix the issue:.
> 
>     From 25585cc98812c90f819d78742243299a933ac879 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>     From: Lancelot SIX <lancelot.six@amd.com>
>     Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 17:58:08 +0000
>     Subject: [PATCH] gdb: ensure test_name is initialized in gdb_breakpoint
>     
>     A refactoring in 4b9728bec15 (gdb: use gdb_test_multiple in
>     gdb_breakpoint) left the $test_name variable initialized.

Woops, thanks for noticing and for the patch.

initialized -> uninitialized (or undefined)?

>     
>     This patch fixes this.
>     ---
>      gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp | 3 ++-
>      1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>     
>     diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
>     index ba16b2ab315..e17eace4cb1 100644
>     --- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
>     +++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
>     @@ -639,8 +639,9 @@ proc gdb_breakpoint { linespec args } {
>      	set print_pass 1
>          }
>      
>     +    set test_name "gdb_breakpoint: set breakpoint at $linespec"
>          # The first two regexps are what we get with -g, the third is without -g.
>     -    gdb_test_multiple "$break_command $linespec" "gdb_breakpoint: set breakpoint at $linespec" {
>     +    gdb_test_multiple "$break_command $linespec" $test_name {
>      	-re "$break_message \[0-9\]* at .*: file .*, line $decimal.\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {}
>      	-re "$break_message \[0-9\]*: file .*, line $decimal.\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {}
>      	-re "$break_message \[0-9\]* at .*$gdb_prompt $" {}
>     -- 
>     2.34.1

This LGTM, thanks:

Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>

Simon

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-04 19:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-03 19:22 Simon Marchi
2023-01-04  9:15 ` Lancelot SIX
2023-01-04 16:11   ` Simon Marchi
2023-01-04 16:18     ` Lancelot SIX
2023-01-04 16:22       ` Simon Marchi
2023-01-04 17:40         ` Lancelot SIX
2023-01-04 18:02           ` Lancelot SIX
2023-01-04 19:05             ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2023-01-04 19:12               ` Lancelot SIX
2023-01-05  9:04 ` Tom de Vries
2023-01-05 16:28   ` Simon Marchi
2023-01-05 16:31     ` Tom de Vries
2023-01-05 16:36       ` Simon Marchi
2023-01-10 15:33     ` Pedro Alves
2023-01-10 15:50       ` Simon Marchi
2023-01-10 19:56         ` Pedro Alves
2023-01-10 20:42           ` Simon Marchi
2023-01-11 19:05             ` Pedro Alves
2023-01-11 19:42               ` Simon Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e3fa2940-51b3-d7ae-3309-a280c219910f@polymtl.ca \
    --to=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=lsix@lancelotsix.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).