public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: simon.marchi@efficios.com
Subject: Re: [PING*2][PATCH v3 0/2] [gdb] untie and validate inheritance location
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 10:17:20 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f6743e93-d85e-c31d-54b0-e46c2a526aff@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <461f4ea1-8534-a6dc-c50d-2e6dd7522da1@redhat.com>

ping

On 10/19/21 16:15, Bruno Larsen wrote:
> ping
> 
> On 9/30/21 16:26, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>> This started with what was thought of as an incorrect inheritance
>> location expression, but turned out to be a correct, but unusual
>> expression, and uncovered an incorrect assumption when calculating
>> offsets of baseclasses.
>>
>> This patchset is the new iteration of that solution, that changed
>> gnuv3_baseclass_offset calculation to allow for non-virtual inheritance
>> that has a non-trivial location expression and also moved the basic
>> validation to this function. The check in value_contents_copy_raw was
>> changed to an assert.
>> Finally, the test was expanded to have one incorrect trivial location,
>> and two non-trivial location expressions, one correct and one incorrect.
>>
>> Bruno Larsen (2):
>>    [gdb] Untied inheritance virtuality and loc kind
>>    [gdb] Add Simple offset validation when calculating baseclass_offset
>>
>>   gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c                              |  23 +-
>>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp  | 233 +++++++++++++++++
>>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp  | 235 ++++++++++++++++++
>>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c      |  69 +++++
>>   gdb/value.c                                   |   8 +-
>>   5 files changed, 561 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp
>>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp
>>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Cheers!
Bruno Larsen


  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-01 13:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-30 19:26 [PATCH " Bruno Larsen
2021-09-30 19:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] [gdb] Untied inheritance virtuality and loc kind Bruno Larsen
2021-09-30 19:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] [gdb] Add Simple offset validation when calculating baseclass_offset Bruno Larsen
2021-09-30 19:36   ` [PATCH v3 2/2 RESEND] " Bruno Larsen
2021-10-19 19:15 ` [PING][PATCH v3 0/2] [gdb] untie and validate inheritance location Bruno Larsen
2021-11-01 13:17   ` Bruno Larsen [this message]
2021-11-08 18:33     ` [PING*3][PATCH " Bruno Larsen
2021-11-08 21:16       ` Simon Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f6743e93-d85e-c31d-54b0-e46c2a526aff@redhat.com \
    --to=blarsen@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).