public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
To: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
	 Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>,
	Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTED PATCH] Fix procfs.c compilation
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 11:09:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ydd7clyutcv.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bb78712b-a4f5-4721-b9c2-735695f2258b@simark.ca> (Simon Marchi's message of "Thu, 30 Nov 2023 11:29:22 -0500")

Hi Simon,

>> Btw., I'd considered reviving the Solaris buildbots to guard against
>> this kind of issues.  However, they'd both (sparcv9 and amd64) would
>> need to be build-only: the make check phase takes 3-5 times as long as
>> the build, there are about 2500 failures and quite a number of those are
>> flakey.  I have no idea if the new buildmaster allows for such a
>> compile-only configuration, though (the previous one did).

> Having build-only builders would already be really great, I'm pretty
> sure it's possible (CCing Mark Wielaard).

I think I checked when the new buildmaster went first online, but
couldn't find anything at the time.  I've now rechecked the new config
and indeed there are quite a number of build-only configs in use.

> If you can identify a few simple and stable tests, it's possible to run
> just those (I think that's what the buildbot does even for Linux/x86
> today).  It would at least help ensure that GDB is not completely
> broken.

Seems like a good compromise between a pure build-only config and one
that runs the full testsuite, but drowns us in noise from timeouts and
flakiness.   I'll have a look.

Thanks.
	Rainer

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University

  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-01 10:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-30  9:54 Rainer Orth
2023-11-30 16:29 ` Simon Marchi
2023-12-01 10:09   ` Rainer Orth [this message]
2023-12-10 23:07     ` Mark Wielaard
2023-12-11 14:40       ` Rainer Orth
2023-12-12  9:40         ` Mark Wielaard
2023-12-13  9:15           ` Rainer Orth
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-03-31  8:40 Rainer Orth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ydd7clyutcv.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE \
    --to=ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=mark@klomp.org \
    --cc=simark@simark.ca \
    --cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).