From: Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
To: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
Cc: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTED PATCH] Fix procfs.c compilation
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 10:15:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yddbkaupiny.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231212094050.GD14917@gnu.wildebeest.org> (Mark Wielaard's message of "Tue, 12 Dec 2023 10:40:50 +0100")
Hi Mark,
>> > We do have workers for different architectures, but they are all
>> > GNU/Linux. If you have a Solaris worker that can be used then please
>> > contact https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/buildbot
>>
>> I do: both systems (Solaris 11.4/SPARC and Solaris 11.4/amd64) used to
>> run compile-only buildbots with the previous buildmaster.
>>
>> They are currently used for LLVM (sparcv9, amd64) and Golang (amd64)
>> buildbots, but have some free capacity.
>
> Lets discuss on the buildbot mailinglist how we can hook those up if
> you want to.
certainly. Being pretty busy right now, I'll most like have to postpone
this to early next year.
>> >> > If you can identify a few simple and stable tests, it's possible to run
>> >> > just those (I think that's what the buildbot does even for Linux/x86
>> >> > today). It would at least help ensure that GDB is not completely
>> >> > broken.
>> >>
>> >> Seems like a good compromise between a pure build-only config and one
>> >> that runs the full testsuite, but drowns us in noise from timeouts and
>> >> flakiness. I'll have a look.
>> >
>> > Currently the list of tests run for gdb is fairly small, but they are
>> > all must succeed tests (they are run under native, gdbserver and
>> > extended-gdbserver):
>> > https://sourceware.org/cgit/builder/tree/builder/master.cfg#n2883
>>
>> I'll check if those work reliably. In the worst case, the Solaris bots
>> would have to become compile-only, so at least guarding against build
>> failures. However, I'm uncertain about gdbserver: I don't even know if
>> it compiles on Solaris, let alone does anything useful.
>
> We can be very flexible in what we build/test. It doesn't need to be
> the same set of tests, we can remove gdbserver build/tests for
> Solaris, etc. We can do builds on every commit, collapse builds for
> the last set of commit or just once a day.
Excellent: so we can easily tune the worker to the machine's capacity.
I've meanwhile checked that set of gdb tests: most of them seem to PASS
reliably on Solaris, while a few FAIL while they should really be
UNSUPPORTED. As I suspected, gdbserver never has been ported to
Solaris, so that set of tests will have to be omitted.
Thanks.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-13 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-30 9:54 Rainer Orth
2023-11-30 16:29 ` Simon Marchi
2023-12-01 10:09 ` Rainer Orth
2023-12-10 23:07 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-12-11 14:40 ` Rainer Orth
2023-12-12 9:40 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-12-13 9:15 ` Rainer Orth [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-03-31 8:40 Rainer Orth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yddbkaupiny.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE \
--to=ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=mark@klomp.org \
--cc=simark@simark.ca \
--cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).