public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug breakpoints/10120] New: Should catchpoints be shown with type 'catchpoint' in 'info breakpoints' ?
@ 2009-04-30 22:34 pedro at codesourcery dot com
2009-04-30 22:39 ` [Bug breakpoints/10120] Does the user care that some catchpoints happen to be implemented with breakpoints? pedro at codesourcery dot com
2009-04-30 22:44 ` [Bug breakpoints/10120] Should catchpoints be shown with type 'catchpoint' in 'info breakpoints' ? pedro at codesourcery dot com
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pedro at codesourcery dot com @ 2009-04-30 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
Currently:
(gdb) catch catch
Function "__cxa_begin_catch" not defined.
Catchpoint 2 (catch)
(gdb) info breakpoints
Num Type Disp Enb Address What
2 breakpoint keep y <PENDING> exception catch
^^^^^^^^^^
(gdb)
Should that be:
(gdb) info breakpoints
Num Type Disp Enb Address What
2 catchpoint keep y <PENDING> exception catch
^^^^^^^^^^
?
--
Summary: Should catchpoints be shown with type 'catchpoint' in
'info breakpoints' ?
Product: gdb
Version: 6.50
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: breakpoints
AssignedTo: unassigned at sourceware dot org
ReportedBy: pedro at codesourcery dot com
CC: gdb-prs at sourceware dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10120
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug breakpoints/10120] Does the user care that some catchpoints happen to be implemented with breakpoints?
2009-04-30 22:34 [Bug breakpoints/10120] New: Should catchpoints be shown with type 'catchpoint' in 'info breakpoints' ? pedro at codesourcery dot com
@ 2009-04-30 22:39 ` pedro at codesourcery dot com
2009-04-30 22:44 ` [Bug breakpoints/10120] Should catchpoints be shown with type 'catchpoint' in 'info breakpoints' ? pedro at codesourcery dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pedro at codesourcery dot com @ 2009-04-30 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
------- Additional Comments From pedro at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-30 22:39 -------
Is the 'Address' column as is shown today meaningful to a user at all?
>./gdb ./testsuite/gdb.cp/gdb1355
GNU gdb (GDB) 6.8.50.20090430-cvs
(gdb) catch catch
Function "__cxa_begin_catch" not defined.
Catchpoint 1 (catch)
(gdb) info breakpoints
Num Type Disp Enb Address What
1 breakpoint keep y <PENDING> exception catch
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
(gdb) start
Temporary breakpoint 2 at 0x40053c: file
../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/gdb1355.cc, line 34.
Starting program: /home/pedro/gdb/mainline/build/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/gdb1355
Temporary breakpoint 2, main () at ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/gdb1355.cc:34
34 return 0;
(gdb) info breakpoints
Num Type Disp Enb Address What
1 breakpoint keep y 0x00007ffff7b983c0 exception catch
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
(gdb)
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Should catchpoints be shown |Does the user care that some
|with type 'catchpoint' in |catchpoints happen to be
|'info breakpoints' ? |implemented with
| |breakpoints?
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10120
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug breakpoints/10120] Should catchpoints be shown with type 'catchpoint' in 'info breakpoints' ?
2009-04-30 22:34 [Bug breakpoints/10120] New: Should catchpoints be shown with type 'catchpoint' in 'info breakpoints' ? pedro at codesourcery dot com
2009-04-30 22:39 ` [Bug breakpoints/10120] Does the user care that some catchpoints happen to be implemented with breakpoints? pedro at codesourcery dot com
@ 2009-04-30 22:44 ` pedro at codesourcery dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pedro at codesourcery dot com @ 2009-04-30 22:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
------- Additional Comments From pedro at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-30 22:44 -------
The second comment was meant to be a new PR... It is now PR10121.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Does the user care that some|Should catchpoints be shown
|catchpoints happen to be |with type 'catchpoint' in
|implemented with |'info breakpoints' ?
|breakpoints? |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10120
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug breakpoints/10120] Should catchpoints be shown with type 'catchpoint' in 'info breakpoints' ?
[not found] <bug-10120-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2022-01-03 13:33 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org
@ 2024-01-07 13:23 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: ssbssa at sourceware dot org @ 2024-01-07 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10120
Hannes Domani <ssbssa at sourceware dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|6.8 |9.1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Hannes Domani <ssbssa at sourceware dot org> ---
Was fixed by this commit:
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=cb1e4e32c2d9588e1d77ea49bafb5dcdc1cff764
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug breakpoints/10120] Should catchpoints be shown with type 'catchpoint' in 'info breakpoints' ?
[not found] <bug-10120-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2022-01-03 13:33 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org
2024-01-07 13:23 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: ssbssa at sourceware dot org @ 2022-01-03 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10120
Hannes Domani <ssbssa at sourceware dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ssbssa at sourceware dot org
--- Comment #3 from Hannes Domani <ssbssa at sourceware dot org> ---
I think this was fixed with:
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=ce78b96d4f550fd3e28d31ffa74208f609bfa344
But I'm not completely sure, because that commit was before the creation of
this ticket.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-07 13:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-04-30 22:34 [Bug breakpoints/10120] New: Should catchpoints be shown with type 'catchpoint' in 'info breakpoints' ? pedro at codesourcery dot com
2009-04-30 22:39 ` [Bug breakpoints/10120] Does the user care that some catchpoints happen to be implemented with breakpoints? pedro at codesourcery dot com
2009-04-30 22:44 ` [Bug breakpoints/10120] Should catchpoints be shown with type 'catchpoint' in 'info breakpoints' ? pedro at codesourcery dot com
[not found] <bug-10120-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2022-01-03 13:33 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org
2024-01-07 13:23 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).