public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug breakpoints/10120] New: Should catchpoints be shown with type 'catchpoint' in 'info breakpoints' ? @ 2009-04-30 22:34 pedro at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-30 22:39 ` [Bug breakpoints/10120] Does the user care that some catchpoints happen to be implemented with breakpoints? pedro at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-30 22:44 ` [Bug breakpoints/10120] Should catchpoints be shown with type 'catchpoint' in 'info breakpoints' ? pedro at codesourcery dot com 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: pedro at codesourcery dot com @ 2009-04-30 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb-prs Currently: (gdb) catch catch Function "__cxa_begin_catch" not defined. Catchpoint 2 (catch) (gdb) info breakpoints Num Type Disp Enb Address What 2 breakpoint keep y <PENDING> exception catch ^^^^^^^^^^ (gdb) Should that be: (gdb) info breakpoints Num Type Disp Enb Address What 2 catchpoint keep y <PENDING> exception catch ^^^^^^^^^^ ? -- Summary: Should catchpoints be shown with type 'catchpoint' in 'info breakpoints' ? Product: gdb Version: 6.50 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: breakpoints AssignedTo: unassigned at sourceware dot org ReportedBy: pedro at codesourcery dot com CC: gdb-prs at sourceware dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10120 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug breakpoints/10120] Does the user care that some catchpoints happen to be implemented with breakpoints? 2009-04-30 22:34 [Bug breakpoints/10120] New: Should catchpoints be shown with type 'catchpoint' in 'info breakpoints' ? pedro at codesourcery dot com @ 2009-04-30 22:39 ` pedro at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-30 22:44 ` [Bug breakpoints/10120] Should catchpoints be shown with type 'catchpoint' in 'info breakpoints' ? pedro at codesourcery dot com 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: pedro at codesourcery dot com @ 2009-04-30 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb-prs ------- Additional Comments From pedro at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-30 22:39 ------- Is the 'Address' column as is shown today meaningful to a user at all? >./gdb ./testsuite/gdb.cp/gdb1355 GNU gdb (GDB) 6.8.50.20090430-cvs (gdb) catch catch Function "__cxa_begin_catch" not defined. Catchpoint 1 (catch) (gdb) info breakpoints Num Type Disp Enb Address What 1 breakpoint keep y <PENDING> exception catch ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ (gdb) start Temporary breakpoint 2 at 0x40053c: file ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/gdb1355.cc, line 34. Starting program: /home/pedro/gdb/mainline/build/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/gdb1355 Temporary breakpoint 2, main () at ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/gdb1355.cc:34 34 return 0; (gdb) info breakpoints Num Type Disp Enb Address What 1 breakpoint keep y 0x00007ffff7b983c0 exception catch ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ (gdb) -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Should catchpoints be shown |Does the user care that some |with type 'catchpoint' in |catchpoints happen to be |'info breakpoints' ? |implemented with | |breakpoints? http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10120 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug breakpoints/10120] Should catchpoints be shown with type 'catchpoint' in 'info breakpoints' ? 2009-04-30 22:34 [Bug breakpoints/10120] New: Should catchpoints be shown with type 'catchpoint' in 'info breakpoints' ? pedro at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-30 22:39 ` [Bug breakpoints/10120] Does the user care that some catchpoints happen to be implemented with breakpoints? pedro at codesourcery dot com @ 2009-04-30 22:44 ` pedro at codesourcery dot com 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: pedro at codesourcery dot com @ 2009-04-30 22:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb-prs ------- Additional Comments From pedro at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-30 22:44 ------- The second comment was meant to be a new PR... It is now PR10121. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Does the user care that some|Should catchpoints be shown |catchpoints happen to be |with type 'catchpoint' in |implemented with |'info breakpoints' ? |breakpoints? | http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10120 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <bug-10120-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>]
* [Bug breakpoints/10120] Should catchpoints be shown with type 'catchpoint' in 'info breakpoints' ? [not found] <bug-10120-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> @ 2022-01-03 13:33 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org 2024-01-07 13:23 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: ssbssa at sourceware dot org @ 2022-01-03 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb-prs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10120 Hannes Domani <ssbssa at sourceware dot org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ssbssa at sourceware dot org --- Comment #3 from Hannes Domani <ssbssa at sourceware dot org> --- I think this was fixed with: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=ce78b96d4f550fd3e28d31ffa74208f609bfa344 But I'm not completely sure, because that commit was before the creation of this ticket. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug breakpoints/10120] Should catchpoints be shown with type 'catchpoint' in 'info breakpoints' ? [not found] <bug-10120-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> 2022-01-03 13:33 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org @ 2024-01-07 13:23 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: ssbssa at sourceware dot org @ 2024-01-07 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb-prs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10120 Hannes Domani <ssbssa at sourceware dot org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.8 |9.1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Hannes Domani <ssbssa at sourceware dot org> --- Was fixed by this commit: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=cb1e4e32c2d9588e1d77ea49bafb5dcdc1cff764 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-07 13:23 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2009-04-30 22:34 [Bug breakpoints/10120] New: Should catchpoints be shown with type 'catchpoint' in 'info breakpoints' ? pedro at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-30 22:39 ` [Bug breakpoints/10120] Does the user care that some catchpoints happen to be implemented with breakpoints? pedro at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-30 22:44 ` [Bug breakpoints/10120] Should catchpoints be shown with type 'catchpoint' in 'info breakpoints' ? pedro at codesourcery dot com [not found] <bug-10120-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> 2022-01-03 13:33 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org 2024-01-07 13:23 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).