public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug remote/18965] New: new vforkdone stop reply should indicate parent process ID
@ 2015-09-15 16:10 palves at redhat dot com
  2015-09-15 16:10 ` [Bug remote/18965] " palves at redhat dot com
                   ` (7 more replies)
  0 siblings, 8 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: palves at redhat dot com @ 2015-09-15 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18965

            Bug ID: 18965
           Summary: new vforkdone stop reply should indicate parent
                    process ID
           Product: gdb
           Version: HEAD
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: remote
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: palves at redhat dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

The new vforkdone stop reply misses indicating the thread ID of the vfork
parent which the event relates to:

Note:

 @cindex vforkdone events, remote reply
 @item vforkdone
 The packet indicates that a child process created by a vfork
 has either called @code{exec} or terminated, so that the
 address spaces of the parent and child process are no longer
 shared. The @var{r} part is ignored.  This packet is only
 applicable to targets that support vforkdone events.

vs:

 @cindex vfork events, remote reply
 @item vfork
 The packet indicates that @code{vfork} was called, and @var{r}
 is the thread ID of the new child process. Refer to
 @ref{thread-id syntax} for the format of the @var{thread-id}
 field.  This packet is only applicable to targets that support
 vfork events.

Unfortunately, this is not just a documentation issue.  GDBserver
is really not specifying the thread ID.  In non-stop mode, gdb complains:

 [Thread 6089.6089] #1 stopped.
 #0  0x0000003615a011f0 in ?? ()
 0x0000003615a011f0 in ?? ()
 (gdb) set debug remote 1
 (gdb) c
 Continuing.
 Sending packet: $QPassSignals:e;10;14;17;1a;1b;1c;21;24;25;2c;4c;#5f...Packet
received: OK
 Sending packet: $vCont;c:p17c9.17c9#88...Packet received: OK
   Notification received:
Stop:T05vfork:p17ce.17ce;06:40d7ffffff7f0000;07:30d7ffffff7f0000;10:e4c9eb1536000000;thread:p17c9.17c9;core:2;
 Sending packet: $vStopped#55...Packet received: OK
 Sending packet: $D;17ce#af...Packet received: OK
 Sending packet: $vCont;c:p17c9.17c9#88...Packet received: OK
   Notification received: Stop:T05vforkdone:;
 No process or thread specified in stop reply: T05vforkdone:;
 (gdb)

This is not non-stop-mode-specific, however.  Consider e.g., that
in all-stop, you may be debugging more than one process at the
same time.  You continue, and both processes vfork.  So if you next
a T05vforkdone, there's no way to tell which of the parent processes
is done with the vfork.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug remote/18965] new vforkdone stop reply should indicate parent process ID
  2015-09-15 16:10 [Bug remote/18965] New: new vforkdone stop reply should indicate parent process ID palves at redhat dot com
@ 2015-09-15 16:10 ` palves at redhat dot com
  2015-09-15 16:33 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: palves at redhat dot com @ 2015-09-15 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18965

Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|HEAD                        |7.10

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug remote/18965] new vforkdone stop reply should indicate parent process ID
  2015-09-15 16:10 [Bug remote/18965] New: new vforkdone stop reply should indicate parent process ID palves at redhat dot com
  2015-09-15 16:10 ` [Bug remote/18965] " palves at redhat dot com
@ 2015-09-15 16:33 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-09-15 16:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-09-15 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18965

--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Pedro Alves <palves@sourceware.org>:

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8228463cbca8d629572dbad99286c4e05886350b

commit 8228463cbca8d629572dbad99286c4e05886350b
Author: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Sep 15 17:32:45 2015 +0100

    PR remote/18965: vforkdone stop reply should indicate parent PID

    The vforkdone stop reply misses indicating the thread ID of the vfork
    parent which the event relates to:

     @cindex vfork events, remote reply
     @item vfork
     The packet indicates that @code{vfork} was called, and @var{r}
     is the thread ID of the new child process. Refer to
     @ref{thread-id syntax} for the format of the @var{thread-id}
     field.  This packet is only applicable to targets that support
     vfork events.

     @cindex vforkdone events, remote reply
     @item vforkdone
     The packet indicates that a child process created by a vfork
     has either called @code{exec} or terminated, so that the
     address spaces of the parent and child process are no longer
     shared. The @var{r} part is ignored.  This packet is only
     applicable to targets that support vforkdone events.

    Unfortunately, this is not just a documentation issue.  GDBserver
    is really not specifying the thread ID.  I noticed because
    in non-stop mode, gdb complains:

     [Thread 6089.6089] #1 stopped.
     #0  0x0000003615a011f0 in ?? ()
     0x0000003615a011f0 in ?? ()
     (gdb) set debug remote 1
     (gdb) c
     Continuing.
     Sending packet:
$QPassSignals:e;10;14;17;1a;1b;1c;21;24;25;2c;4c;#5f...Packet received: OK
     Sending packet: $vCont;c:p17c9.17c9#88...Packet received: OK
       Notification received:
Stop:T05vfork:p17ce.17ce;06:40d7ffffff7f0000;07:30d7ffffff7f0000;10:e4c9eb1536000000;thread:p17c9.17c9;core:2;
     Sending packet: $vStopped#55...Packet received: OK
     Sending packet: $D;17ce#af...Packet received: OK
     Sending packet: $vCont;c:p17c9.17c9#88...Packet received: OK
       Notification received: Stop:T05vforkdone:;
     No process or thread specified in stop reply: T05vforkdone:;
     (gdb)

    This is not non-stop-mode-specific, however.  Consider e.g., that in
    all-stop, you may be debugging more than one process at the same time.
    You continue, and both processes vfork.  So when you next get a
    T05vforkdone, there's no way to tell which of the parent processes is
    done with the vfork.

    Tests will be added later.

    Tested on x86_64 Fedora 20.

    gdb/ChangeLog:
    2015-09-15  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

        PR remote/18965
        * remote-utils.c (prepare_resume_reply): Merge
        TARGET_WAITKIND_VFORK_DONE switch case with the
        TARGET_WAITKIND_FORKED case.

    gdb/doc/ChangeLog:
    2015-09-15  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

        PR remote/18965
        * gdb.texinfo (Stop Reply Packets): Explain that vforkdone's 'r'
        part indicates the thread ID of the parent process.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug remote/18965] new vforkdone stop reply should indicate parent process ID
  2015-09-15 16:10 [Bug remote/18965] New: new vforkdone stop reply should indicate parent process ID palves at redhat dot com
  2015-09-15 16:10 ` [Bug remote/18965] " palves at redhat dot com
  2015-09-15 16:33 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-09-15 16:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-09-15 17:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-09-15 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18965

--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Pedro Alves <palves@sourceware.org>:

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=5a676acc4bba751c7746c4a200a054d6c557f3ee

commit 5a676acc4bba751c7746c4a200a054d6c557f3ee
Author: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Sep 15 17:35:21 2015 +0100

    Move ChangeLog entry to proper place

    gdb/ChangeLog -> gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog

    2015-09-15  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

        PR remote/18965
        * remote-utils.c (prepare_resume_reply): Merge
        TARGET_WAITKIND_VFORK_DONE switch case with the
        TARGET_WAITKIND_FORKED case.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug remote/18965] new vforkdone stop reply should indicate parent process ID
  2015-09-15 16:10 [Bug remote/18965] New: new vforkdone stop reply should indicate parent process ID palves at redhat dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-09-15 16:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-09-15 17:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-09-15 17:06 ` palves at redhat dot com
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-09-15 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18965

--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The gdb-7.10-branch branch has been updated by Pedro Alves
<palves@sourceware.org>:

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=487bf2f7066948fffd3447a3c6dd83389a037e2d

commit 487bf2f7066948fffd3447a3c6dd83389a037e2d
Author: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Sep 15 17:45:26 2015 +0100

    PR remote/18965: vforkdone stop reply should indicate parent PID

    The vforkdone stop reply misses indicating the thread ID of the vfork
    parent which the event relates to:

     @cindex vfork events, remote reply
     @item vfork
     The packet indicates that @code{vfork} was called, and @var{r}
     is the thread ID of the new child process. Refer to
     @ref{thread-id syntax} for the format of the @var{thread-id}
     field.  This packet is only applicable to targets that support
     vfork events.

     @cindex vforkdone events, remote reply
     @item vforkdone
     The packet indicates that a child process created by a vfork
     has either called @code{exec} or terminated, so that the
     address spaces of the parent and child process are no longer
     shared. The @var{r} part is ignored.  This packet is only
     applicable to targets that support vforkdone events.

    Unfortunately, this is not just a documentation issue.  GDBserver
    is really not specifying the thread ID.  I noticed because
    in non-stop mode, gdb complains:

     [Thread 6089.6089] #1 stopped.
     #0  0x0000003615a011f0 in ?? ()
     0x0000003615a011f0 in ?? ()
     (gdb) set debug remote 1
     (gdb) c
     Continuing.
     Sending packet:
$QPassSignals:e;10;14;17;1a;1b;1c;21;24;25;2c;4c;#5f...Packet received: OK
     Sending packet: $vCont;c:p17c9.17c9#88...Packet received: OK
       Notification received:
Stop:T05vfork:p17ce.17ce;06:40d7ffffff7f0000;07:30d7ffffff7f0000;10:e4c9eb1536000000;thread:p17c9.17c9;core:2;
     Sending packet: $vStopped#55...Packet received: OK
     Sending packet: $D;17ce#af...Packet received: OK
     Sending packet: $vCont;c:p17c9.17c9#88...Packet received: OK
       Notification received: Stop:T05vforkdone:;
     No process or thread specified in stop reply: T05vforkdone:;
     (gdb)

    This is not non-stop-mode-specific, however.  Consider e.g., that in
    all-stop, you may be debugging more than one process at the same time.
    You continue, and both processes vfork.  So when you next get a
    T05vforkdone, there's no way to tell which of the parent processes is
    done with the vfork.

    Tests will be added later.

    Tested on x86_64 Fedora 20.

    gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog:
    2015-09-15  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

        PR remote/18965
        * remote-utils.c (prepare_resume_reply): Merge
        TARGET_WAITKIND_VFORK_DONE switch case with the
        TARGET_WAITKIND_FORKED case.

    gdb/doc/ChangeLog:
    2015-09-15  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

        PR remote/18965
        * gdb.texinfo (Stop Reply Packets): Explain that vforkdone's 'r'
        part indicates the thread ID of the parent process.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug remote/18965] new vforkdone stop reply should indicate parent process ID
  2015-09-15 16:10 [Bug remote/18965] New: new vforkdone stop reply should indicate parent process ID palves at redhat dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-09-15 17:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-09-15 17:06 ` palves at redhat dot com
  2015-09-15 18:34 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: palves at redhat dot com @ 2015-09-15 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18965

Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |7.10

--- Comment #4 from Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com> ---
Fixed in (the future) 7.10.1 and master.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug remote/18965] new vforkdone stop reply should indicate parent process ID
  2015-09-15 16:10 [Bug remote/18965] New: new vforkdone stop reply should indicate parent process ID palves at redhat dot com
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-09-15 17:06 ` palves at redhat dot com
@ 2015-09-15 18:34 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-09-15 18:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-10-21  6:50 ` bap.fayol at gmail dot com
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-09-15 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18965

--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Pedro Alves <palves@sourceware.org>:

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e68fa6f07666ec4726cfef59f641a81244cc2e00

commit e68fa6f07666ec4726cfef59f641a81244cc2e00
Author: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Sep 15 19:29:37 2015 +0100

    gdb/doc: revert previous vforkdone change

    The previous manual change was wrong.  The vfork parent thread ID
    should be reported with the usual "thread" magic register:

       Sending packet: $vCont;c:p7260.7260#1e...Packet received: OK
     -   Notification received: Stop:T05vforkdone:;
     +   Notification received: Stop:T05vforkdone:;thread:p7260.7260
                                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    This is already how the parent is reported in the vfork/fork events,
    and is actually what the fix made gdbserver do.  Following the
    documentation change, the event would have been reported like this
    instead:

        Notification received: Stop:T05vforkdone:p7260.7260

    gdb/doc/ChangeLog:
    2015-09-15  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

        PR remote/18965
        * gdb.texinfo (Stop Reply Packets): Revert previous change to
        the vforkdone description.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug remote/18965] new vforkdone stop reply should indicate parent process ID
  2015-09-15 16:10 [Bug remote/18965] New: new vforkdone stop reply should indicate parent process ID palves at redhat dot com
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-09-15 18:34 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-09-15 18:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-10-21  6:50 ` bap.fayol at gmail dot com
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-09-15 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18965

--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The gdb-7.10-branch branch has been updated by Pedro Alves
<palves@sourceware.org>:

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9c53c9a4a221addc05c0cd3a8f44974d8c8b2444

commit 9c53c9a4a221addc05c0cd3a8f44974d8c8b2444
Author: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Sep 15 19:35:56 2015 +0100

    gdb/doc: revert previous vforkdone change

    The previous manual change was wrong.  The vfork parent thread ID
    should be reported with the usual "thread" magic register:

       Sending packet: $vCont;c:p7260.7260#1e...Packet received: OK
     -   Notification received: Stop:T05vforkdone:;
     +   Notification received: Stop:T05vforkdone:;thread:p7260.7260
                                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    This is already how the parent is reported in the vfork/fork events,
    and is actually what the fix made gdbserver do.  Following the
    documentation change, the event would have been reported like this
    instead:

        Notification received: Stop:T05vforkdone:p7260.7260

    gdb/doc/ChangeLog:
    2015-09-15  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

        PR remote/18965
        * gdb.texinfo (Stop Reply Packets): Revert previous change to
        the vforkdone description.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug remote/18965] new vforkdone stop reply should indicate parent process ID
  2015-09-15 16:10 [Bug remote/18965] New: new vforkdone stop reply should indicate parent process ID palves at redhat dot com
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-09-15 18:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-10-21  6:50 ` bap.fayol at gmail dot com
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: bap.fayol at gmail dot com @ 2021-10-21  6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18965

yaoltreza <bap.fayol at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bap.fayol at gmail dot com

--- Comment #7 from yaoltreza <bap.fayol at gmail dot com> ---
thank you for all the tips. https://www.eaukangen.net/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-21  6:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-09-15 16:10 [Bug remote/18965] New: new vforkdone stop reply should indicate parent process ID palves at redhat dot com
2015-09-15 16:10 ` [Bug remote/18965] " palves at redhat dot com
2015-09-15 16:33 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-09-15 16:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-09-15 17:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-09-15 17:06 ` palves at redhat dot com
2015-09-15 18:34 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-09-15 18:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-21  6:50 ` bap.fayol at gmail dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).