public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug gdb/26761] thread.c:95: internal-error: thread_info* inferior_thread(): Assertion `current_thread_ != nullptr' failed Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 23:21:59 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-26761-4717-S9O3zkbuZk@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-26761-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26761 --- Comment #22 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Kevin Buettner <kevinb@sourceware.org>: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=96e3f4e3c32865fecdb266c2a41532337c75e316 commit 96e3f4e3c32865fecdb266c2a41532337c75e316 Author: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> Date: Mon Feb 27 16:11:37 2023 -0700 Forced quit cases handled by resetting sync_quit_force_run During my audit of the use of gdb_exception with regard to QUIT processing, I found a try/catch in the scoped_switch_fork_info destructor. Static analysis found this call path from the destructor to maybe_quit(): scoped_switch_fork_info::~scoped_switch_fork_info() -> remove_breakpoints() -> remove_breakpoint(bp_location*) -> remove_breakpoint_1(bp_location*, remove_bp_reason) -> memory_validate_breakpoint(gdbarch*, bp_target_info*) -> target_read_memory(unsigned long, unsigned char*, long) -> target_read(target_ops*, target_object, char const*, unsigned char*, unsigned long, long) -> maybe_quit() Since it's not safe to do a 'throw' from a destructor, we simply call set_quit_flag and, for gdb_exception_forced_quit, also set sync_quit_force_run. This will cause the appropriate exception to be rethrown at the next QUIT check. Another case is the try / catch in tui_getc() in tui-io.c. The existing catch swallows the exception. I've added a catch for 'gdb_exception_forced_quit', which also swallows the exception, but also sets sync_quit_force_run and calls set_quit_flag in order to restart forced quit processing at the next QUIT check. This is required because it isn't safe to throw into/through readline. Thanks to Pedro Alves for suggesting this idea. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26761 Tested-by: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> Approved-By: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-27 23:21 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-10-20 16:07 [Bug gdb/26761] New: " vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-10-20 16:07 ` [Bug gdb/26761] " vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-25 21:05 ` marcdufresne at laposte dot net 2020-12-13 13:12 ` ddresser at bmc dot com 2020-12-14 19:04 ` simark at simark dot ca 2020-12-14 19:06 ` simark at simark dot ca 2021-02-17 22:34 ` Minima2014 at iCloud dot com 2021-09-16 1:17 ` parke.nexus at gmail dot com 2021-09-19 2:10 ` simark at simark dot ca 2021-09-19 3:43 ` parke.nexus at gmail dot com 2022-09-29 10:02 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-29 12:07 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-29 14:24 ` simark at simark dot ca 2022-09-29 14:42 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-29 14:43 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-29 15:22 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-12-15 14:56 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2023-02-27 23:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-27 23:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-27 23:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-27 23:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-27 23:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-27 23:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-27 23:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-27 23:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2023-03-09 22:44 ` kevinb at redhat dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-26761-4717-S9O3zkbuZk@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).