public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug gdb/26761] thread.c:95: internal-error: thread_info* inferior_thread(): Assertion `current_thread_ != nullptr' failed Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 23:21:49 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-26761-4717-vAlYytlRgf@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-26761-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26761 --- Comment #20 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Kevin Buettner <kevinb@sourceware.org>: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=363429d593eb1eb17f3f2cf6c247f60fadf660d9 commit 363429d593eb1eb17f3f2cf6c247f60fadf660d9 Author: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> Date: Mon Feb 27 16:11:37 2023 -0700 QUIT processing w/ explicit throw for gdb_exception_forced_quit This commit contains changes which have an explicit throw for gdb_exception_forced_quit, or, in a couple of cases for gdb_exception, but with a throw following a check to see if 'reason' is RETURN_FORCED_QUIT. Most of these are straightforward - it made sense to continue to allow an existing catch of gdb_exception to also catch gdb_exception_quit; in these cases, a catch/throw for gdb_exception_forced_quit was added. There are two cases, however, which deserve a more detailed explanation. 1) remote_fileio_request in gdb/remote-fileio.c: The try block calls do_remote_fileio_request which can (in turn) call one of the functions in remote_fio_func_map[]. Taking the first one, remote_fileio_func_open(), we have the following call path to maybe_quit(): remote_fileio_func_open(remote_target*, char*) -> target_read_memory(unsigned long, unsigned char*, long) -> target_read(target_ops*, target_object, char const*, unsigned char*, unsigned long, long) -> maybe_quit() Since there is a path to maybe_quit(), we must ensure that the catch block is not permitted to swallow a QUIT representing a SIGTERM. However, for this case, we must take care not to change the way that Ctrl-C / SIGINT is handled; we want to send a suitable EINTR reply to the remote target should that happen. That being the case, I added a catch/throw for gdb_exception_forced_quit. I also did a bit of rewriting here, adding a catch for gdb_exception_quit in favor of checking the 'reason' code in the catch block for gdb_exception. 2) mi_execute_command in gdb/mi/mi-main.c: The try block calls captured_mi_execute_command(); there exists a call path to maybe_quit(): captured_mi_execute_command(ui_out*, mi_parse*) -> mi_cmd_execute(mi_parse*) -> get_current_frame() -> get_prev_frame_always_1(frame_info*) -> frame_register_unwind_location(frame_info*, int, int*, lval_type*, unsigned long*, int*) -> frame_register_unwind(frame_info*, int, int*, int*, lval_type*, unsigned long*, int*, unsigned char*) -> value_entirely_available(value*) -> value_fetch_lazy(value*) -> value_fetch_lazy_memory(value*) -> read_value_memory(value*, long, int, unsigned long, unsigned char*, unsigned long) -> maybe_quit() That being the case, we can't allow the exception handler (catch block) to swallow a gdb_exception_quit for SIGTERM. However, it does seem reasonable to output the exception via the mi interface so that some suitable message regarding SIGTERM might be printed; therefore, I check the exception's 'reason' field for RETURN_FORCED_QUIT and do a throw for this case. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26761 Tested-by: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> Approved-By: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-27 23:21 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-10-20 16:07 [Bug gdb/26761] New: " vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-10-20 16:07 ` [Bug gdb/26761] " vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-25 21:05 ` marcdufresne at laposte dot net 2020-12-13 13:12 ` ddresser at bmc dot com 2020-12-14 19:04 ` simark at simark dot ca 2020-12-14 19:06 ` simark at simark dot ca 2021-02-17 22:34 ` Minima2014 at iCloud dot com 2021-09-16 1:17 ` parke.nexus at gmail dot com 2021-09-19 2:10 ` simark at simark dot ca 2021-09-19 3:43 ` parke.nexus at gmail dot com 2022-09-29 10:02 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-29 12:07 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-29 14:24 ` simark at simark dot ca 2022-09-29 14:42 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-29 14:43 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-29 15:22 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-12-15 14:56 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2023-02-27 23:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-27 23:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-27 23:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-27 23:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-27 23:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-27 23:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2023-02-27 23:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-27 23:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-03-09 22:44 ` kevinb at redhat dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-26761-4717-vAlYytlRgf@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).