public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug symtab/29105] new DWARF reader still slow
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 13:49:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-29105-4717-3MYZzI6vAT@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-29105-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29105

--- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Tom Tromey <tromey@sourceware.org>:

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=20a26f4e018cd0cb40a3b81568be0d4f164eed0f

commit 20a26f4e018cd0cb40a3b81568be0d4f164eed0f
Author: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
Date:   Fri May 13 13:46:52 2022 -0600

    Finalize each cooked index separately

    After DWARF has been scanned, the cooked index code does a
    "finalization" step in a worker thread.  This step combines all the
    index entries into a single master list, canonicalizes C++ names, and
    splits Ada names to synthesize package names.

    While this step is run in the background, gdb will wait for the
    results in some situations, and it turns out that this step can be
    slow.  This is PR symtab/29105.

    This can be sped up by parallelizing, at a small memory cost.  Now
    each index is finalized on its own, in a worker thread.  The cost
    comes from name canonicalization: if a given non-canonical name is
    referred to by multiple indices, there will be N canonical copies (one
    per index) rather than just one.

    This requires changing the users of the index to iterate over multiple
    results.  However, this is easily done by introducing a new "chained
    range" class.

    When run on gdb itself, the memory cost seems rather low -- on my
    current machine, "maint space 1" reports no change due to the patch.

    For performance testing, using "maint time 1" and "file" will not show
    correct results.  That approach measures "time to next prompt", but
    because the patch only affects background work, this shouldn't (and
    doesn't) change.  Instead, a simple way to make gdb wait for the
    results is to set a breakpoint.

    Before:

        $ /bin/time -f%e ~/gdb/install/bin/gdb -nx -q -batch \
            -ex 'break main' /tmp/gdb
        Breakpoint 1 at 0x43ec30: file ../../binutils-gdb/gdb/gdb.c, line 28.
        2.00

    After:

        $ /bin/time -f%e ./gdb/gdb -nx -q -batch \
            -ex 'break main' /tmp/gdb
        Breakpoint 1 at 0x43ec30: file ../../binutils-gdb/gdb/gdb.c, line 28.
        0.65

    Regression tested on x86-64 Fedora 34.

    Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29105

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-26 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-29 19:51 [Bug symtab/29105] New: " tromey at sourceware dot org
2022-04-29 20:09 ` [Bug symtab/29105] " tromey at sourceware dot org
2022-05-13 20:56 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2022-05-13 21:01 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2022-05-16 18:51 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2022-05-18 16:12 ` simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca
2022-05-20  1:54 ` simark at simark dot ca
2022-05-20 15:13 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2022-05-20 15:36 ` simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca
2022-05-20 15:48 ` simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca
2022-05-26 13:49 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-05-26 13:50 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2022-07-13 16:49 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2022-09-23 20:23 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2022-09-23 20:44 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2022-10-02  0:19 ` brobecker at gnat dot com
2022-10-06 20:44 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2022-10-24 19:27 ` simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca
2022-11-01 20:42 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2022-11-04 20:05 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2022-11-04 20:10 ` simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca
2022-11-04 21:27 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2022-11-04 21:28 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2022-11-04 21:28 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2022-11-05  1:28 ` simark at simark dot ca
2022-11-07 16:28 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2022-11-16  0:09 ` tkacvins at gmail dot com
2022-11-16  0:56 ` simark at simark dot ca
2022-11-16 15:07 ` tkacvins at gmail dot com
2022-12-01 16:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-01 18:18 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-01 18:22 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2022-12-14 10:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-29105-4717-3MYZzI6vAT@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).