public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug symtab/29105] new DWARF reader still slow Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 16:12:14 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-29105-4717-QcqhyfRZL2@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-29105-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29105 Simon Marchi <simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca --- Comment #4 from Simon Marchi <simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca> --- Hi Tom, I'm not sure why I am starting to see this only today, but I see a lot of tests timing out. gdb.base/sizeof.exp is one of them. It looks like it's due to a slowdown that started with the new DWARF reader patches. My build uses -O0 and all the sanitizer and glibcxx debug stuff, so it doesn't help, but I see the same relative slowdown without that. I copied the test program of gdb.base/sizeof.exp to /tmp/sizeof so it could be reused easily across builds. The command I use is: time ./gdb -q --data-directory=data-directory -nx /tmp/sizeof -ex "start" -iex "set debug dwarf-read 0" -ex "p/d sizeof(short)" -batch This replicates the first steps of the test. Using 3d20b8d99a5: ./gdb -q --data-directory=data-directory -nx /tmp/sizeof -ex "start" -ex -e 1.18s user 0.17s system 116% cpu 1.157 total Using 3d20b8d99a5^: ./gdb -q --data-directory=data-directory -nx /tmp/sizeof -ex "start" -ex -e 0.40s user 0.07s system 109% cpu 0.427 total By toggling "set debug dwarf-read" to 1, I noticed that we are now expanding a lot of CUs from libc's debug info when doing the "print sizeof": [dwarf-read] process_queue: Expanding one or more symtabs of objfile /usr/lib/debug/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.31.so ... [dwarf-read] process_queue: Expanding symtab of CU at offset 0xd3cbe [dwarf-read] process_queue: Done expanding CU at offset 0xd3cbe [dwarf-read] process_queue: Done expanding symtabs of /usr/lib/debug/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.31.so. [dwarf-read] process_queue: Expanding one or more symtabs of objfile /usr/lib/debug/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.31.so ... [dwarf-read] process_queue: Expanding symtab of CU at offset 0x22bf6f [dwarf-read] process_queue: Done expanding CU at offset 0x22bf6f [dwarf-read] process_queue: Done expanding symtabs of /usr/lib/debug/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.31.so. [dwarf-read] process_queue: Expanding one or more symtabs of objfile /usr/lib/debug/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.31.so ... [dwarf-read] process_queue: Expanding symtab of CU at offset 0x7ef56e [dwarf-read] process_queue: Done expanding CU at offset 0x7ef56e [dwarf-read] process_queue: Done expanding symtabs of /usr/lib/debug/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.31.so. ... We expand ~1500 CUs. Before, we didn't do that. So having debug info for libc is important for reproducing this, and a GDB configured with --prefix/usr or some other switch that makes it find separate debug info in /usr/lib/debug (by default a local build would look in /usr/local/lib/debug). I am reproducing this on Ubuntu 20.04. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-18 16:12 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-04-29 19:51 [Bug symtab/29105] New: " tromey at sourceware dot org 2022-04-29 20:09 ` [Bug symtab/29105] " tromey at sourceware dot org 2022-05-13 20:56 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2022-05-13 21:01 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2022-05-16 18:51 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2022-05-18 16:12 ` simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca [this message] 2022-05-20 1:54 ` simark at simark dot ca 2022-05-20 15:13 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2022-05-20 15:36 ` simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca 2022-05-20 15:48 ` simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca 2022-05-26 13:49 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-26 13:50 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2022-07-13 16:49 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2022-09-23 20:23 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2022-09-23 20:44 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2022-10-02 0:19 ` brobecker at gnat dot com 2022-10-06 20:44 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2022-10-24 19:27 ` simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca 2022-11-01 20:42 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2022-11-04 20:05 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2022-11-04 20:10 ` simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca 2022-11-04 21:27 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2022-11-04 21:28 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2022-11-04 21:28 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2022-11-05 1:28 ` simark at simark dot ca 2022-11-07 16:28 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2022-11-16 0:09 ` tkacvins at gmail dot com 2022-11-16 0:56 ` simark at simark dot ca 2022-11-16 15:07 ` tkacvins at gmail dot com 2022-12-01 16:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-12-01 18:18 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-12-01 18:22 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2022-12-14 10:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-29105-4717-QcqhyfRZL2@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).