From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: oza Pawandeep <oza.pawandeep@gmail.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [design change] record-replay linux ABI level
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 20:39:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sjf9qecr.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK1A=4xtgYd8hQEwHxjLQiv4eqhCu0cSRDmmbFJvBDJwDxUM+Q__46748.0269181125$1336555010$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com> (oza Pawandeep's message of "Wed, 9 May 2012 14:46:21 +0530")
>>>>> "oza" == oza Pawandeep <oza.pawandeep@gmail.com> writes:
oza> currently linux-record.h is having defination of
oza> enum gdb_syscall {...} which seems generic one, but infact it only
oza> addresses i386 arch.
Based on reading the header, it seems to me that the idea is that this
enum is intended to be generic, and that each target must provide its
own mapping from the local syscalls to these.
oza> I am thinking of moving all the definition to i386 specific files
oza> (assuming there is no generic way to address all the systemcalls on
oza> all arch).
It seems to me that most syscalls could perhaps be shared, but maybe
some architectures will require additions to the enum.
I'm not sure, though.
Could you say in more detail what problem you ran into?
Tom
next parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-09 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAK1A=4xtgYd8hQEwHxjLQiv4eqhCu0cSRDmmbFJvBDJwDxUM+Q__46748.0269181125$1336555010$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com>
2012-05-09 20:39 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2012-05-10 8:49 ` oza Pawandeep
[not found] ` <CAK1A=4xbh0M=yfc2MQpZdDCJEPnL3_z8=TA0VSE7qVCoO0Dn-Q__42617.423789534$1336639800$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com>
2012-05-10 13:39 ` Tom Tromey
2012-05-13 7:19 ` oza Pawandeep
2012-05-13 7:33 ` oza Pawandeep
2012-05-13 9:47 ` oza Pawandeep
2012-05-14 14:57 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-05-15 5:20 ` oza Pawandeep
2012-05-15 5:34 ` Joel Brobecker
[not found] ` <CAK1A=4yervLeVDQ-r49n95ftrB27u8K+R1hfstz1oFwTNX=t7Q__24807.0006179207$1337059251$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com>
2012-05-15 16:42 ` Tom Tromey
2012-05-16 10:48 ` oza Pawandeep
2012-05-16 14:57 ` Tom Tromey
2012-06-05 9:16 ` oza Pawandeep
2012-06-06 18:17 ` Tom Tromey
2012-06-05 9:19 ` oza Pawandeep
2012-05-09 9:16 oza Pawandeep
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sjf9qecr.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=oza.pawandeep@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).