Re: [design change] record-replay linux ABI level

[oza Pawandeep <oza.pawandeep@gmail.com>]

I have gone through some of the xml stuffs already done.
under gdb/syscalls/arch_linux.xml files exist. which is currently not
used for record-purpose.

there are 2 ways we could go ahead now:

1) use the above file for recording purpose too and define new
arm-linux.xml for arm specific syscalls.

2) or we decide to keep only one combined xml files for record-replay
future for all arch.

PS: syscall code is almost done now, it supports 242 syscalls
[till gdb_sys_sched_getaffinity = 242]

(xml stuff is pending, for which either approach 1) or 2) could be taken.)

Regards,
Oza.

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "oza" == oza Pawandeep <oza.pawandeep@gmail.com> writes:
>
> oza> b) I am not much familiar with xml generated C files, and where to
> oza> change in gdb, but with that, will the record_linux_system_call be
> oza> able to incorporate all conflicting syscall numbers in that case ?
>
> The idea is to extend the current approach.  That is, have a single
> generic enum; then map the system-specific numbers to this enum.  The
> difference is that the mappings would be generated from the XML files.
>
> oza> define as follows
> oza> enum gdb_syscall
> oza> {
> oza>            /* i386 related syscalls */
> oza>            /* ARM related syscalls */
> oza>            /* MIPS related syscalls */
> oza>            so on..
> oza> }
>
> Yeah, I don't like this much.
>
> Tom