public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libc/10990] Inconsistent definition of int64_t in sys/types and stdint.h
[not found] <bug-10990-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2014-02-16 17:02 ` jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
2014-05-28 19:43 ` schwab at sourceware dot org
2014-07-01 5:12 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com @ 2014-02-16 17:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10990
Jackie Rosen <jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from Jackie Rosen <jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com> ---
*** Bug 260998 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Seen from the domain http://volichat.com
Page where seen: http://volichat.com/adult-chat-rooms
Marked for reference. Resolved as fixed @bugzilla.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/10990] Inconsistent definition of int64_t in sys/types and stdint.h
[not found] <bug-10990-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2014-02-16 17:02 ` [Bug libc/10990] Inconsistent definition of int64_t in sys/types and stdint.h jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
@ 2014-05-28 19:43 ` schwab at sourceware dot org
2014-07-01 5:12 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: schwab at sourceware dot org @ 2014-05-28 19:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10990
Andreas Schwab <schwab at sourceware dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/10990] Inconsistent definition of int64_t in sys/types and stdint.h
[not found] <bug-10990-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2014-02-16 17:02 ` [Bug libc/10990] Inconsistent definition of int64_t in sys/types and stdint.h jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
2014-05-28 19:43 ` schwab at sourceware dot org
@ 2014-07-01 5:12 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2014-07-01 5:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10990
Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |security-
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/10990] Inconsistent definition of int64_t in sys/types and stdint.h
2009-11-20 0:58 [Bug libc/10990] New: " mateusz at loskot dot net
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-22 17:36 ` john at johnmaddock dot co dot uk
@ 2009-11-22 17:42 ` drepper at redhat dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: drepper at redhat dot com @ 2009-11-22 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2009-11-22 17:42 -------
You cannot have __GLIBC_HAVE_LONG_LONG *not* be defined if you include stdint.h.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10990
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/10990] Inconsistent definition of int64_t in sys/types and stdint.h
2009-11-20 0:58 [Bug libc/10990] New: " mateusz at loskot dot net
2009-11-20 1:10 ` [Bug libc/10990] " mateusz at loskot dot net
2009-11-20 23:57 ` drepper at redhat dot com
@ 2009-11-22 17:36 ` john at johnmaddock dot co dot uk
2009-11-22 17:42 ` drepper at redhat dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: john at johnmaddock dot co dot uk @ 2009-11-22 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From john at johnmaddock dot co dot uk 2009-11-22 17:35 -------
The point here is that stdint.h behaves differently depending upon what has been
#included previously, for example:
#include <sys/types.h> // possibly included from some deep dependency
#include <stdint.h>
May *NOT* result in int64_t being defined if __GLIBC_HAVE_LONG_LONG
is not set, where as had stdint.h been the first include then it *would* have
been defined.
In other words stdint.h may not follow the C99 std depending upon what has
happened to be included previously.
Still think it's not a bug?
IMO stdint.h should always define int64_t no matter what other headers may have
been included first.
John Maddock.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |john at johnmaddock dot co
| |dot uk
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10990
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/10990] Inconsistent definition of int64_t in sys/types and stdint.h
2009-11-20 0:58 [Bug libc/10990] New: " mateusz at loskot dot net
2009-11-20 1:10 ` [Bug libc/10990] " mateusz at loskot dot net
@ 2009-11-20 23:57 ` drepper at redhat dot com
2009-11-22 17:36 ` john at johnmaddock dot co dot uk
2009-11-22 17:42 ` drepper at redhat dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: drepper at redhat dot com @ 2009-11-20 23:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2009-11-20 23:57 -------
stdint.h is a C99 header and C99 demands the implementation of long long. The
headers are correct.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10990
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/10990] Inconsistent definition of int64_t in sys/types and stdint.h
2009-11-20 0:58 [Bug libc/10990] New: " mateusz at loskot dot net
@ 2009-11-20 1:10 ` mateusz at loskot dot net
2009-11-20 23:57 ` drepper at redhat dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: mateusz at loskot dot net @ 2009-11-20 1:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From mateusz at loskot dot net 2009-11-20 01:10 -------
(In reply to comment #0)
> Environment:
> * OS: Linux / Ubuntu 9.10
> * GCC: gcc(Ubuntu 4.4.1-4ubuntu8) 4.4.1
> * glibc: 2.10.1-0ubuntu15 (http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/libc6-dev)
*** CORRECTION TO ENVIRONMENT ***
I'm terribly sorry for my mistake. I've given details of my other
machine/system. Here are correct details of system on which the problem leaks
and on which I prepared the two test programs:
* Linux Ubuntu 9.04 32-bit
* GCC 4.3.3
* glibc 2.9-4ubuntu (http://packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/libc6-dev)
* Comeau C/C++ Compiler front-end 4.3.10.1
I've also changed the glibc version to which this report applies from 2.10 to 2.9.
I'm sorry for confusion.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|2.10 |2.9
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10990
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-07-01 5:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-10990-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2014-02-16 17:02 ` [Bug libc/10990] Inconsistent definition of int64_t in sys/types and stdint.h jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
2014-05-28 19:43 ` schwab at sourceware dot org
2014-07-01 5:12 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2009-11-20 0:58 [Bug libc/10990] New: " mateusz at loskot dot net
2009-11-20 1:10 ` [Bug libc/10990] " mateusz at loskot dot net
2009-11-20 23:57 ` drepper at redhat dot com
2009-11-22 17:36 ` john at johnmaddock dot co dot uk
2009-11-22 17:42 ` drepper at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).