[Bug libc/10990] Inconsistent definition of int64_t in sys/types and stdint.h

[Bug libc/10990] Inconsistent definition of int64_t in sys/types and stdint.h

[jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10990

Jackie Rosen <jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com

--- Comment #5 from Jackie Rosen <jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com> ---
*** Bug 260998 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Seen from the domain http://volichat.com
Page where seen: http://volichat.com/adult-chat-rooms
Marked for reference. Resolved as fixed @bugzilla.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/10990] Inconsistent definition of int64_t in sys/types and stdint.h

[schwab at sourceware dot org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10990

Andreas Schwab <schwab at sourceware dot org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com   |

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/10990] Inconsistent definition of int64_t in sys/types and stdint.h

[fweimer at redhat dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10990

Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |security-

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/10990] Inconsistent definition of int64_t in sys/types and stdint.h

[drepper at redhat dot com]

------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com  2009-11-22 17:42 -------
You cannot have __GLIBC_HAVE_LONG_LONG *not* be defined if you include stdint.h.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10990

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug libc/10990] Inconsistent definition of int64_t in sys/types and stdint.h

[john at johnmaddock dot co dot uk]

------- Additional Comments From john at johnmaddock dot co dot uk  2009-11-22 17:35 -------
The point here is that stdint.h behaves differently depending upon what has been
#included previously, for example:

#include <sys/types.h> // possibly included from some deep dependency
#include <stdint.h>

May *NOT* result in int64_t being defined if __GLIBC_HAVE_LONG_LONG
 is not set, where as had stdint.h been the first include then it *would* have
been defined.

In other words stdint.h may not follow the C99 std depending upon what has
happened to be included previously.

Still think it's not a bug?

IMO stdint.h should always define int64_t no matter what other headers may have
been included first.

John Maddock.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |john at johnmaddock dot co
                   |                            |dot uk
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10990

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug libc/10990] Inconsistent definition of int64_t in sys/types and stdint.h

[drepper at redhat dot com]

------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com  2009-11-20 23:57 -------
stdint.h is a C99 header and C99 demands the implementation of long long.  The
headers are correct.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10990

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug libc/10990] Inconsistent definition of int64_t in sys/types and stdint.h

[mateusz at loskot dot net]

------- Additional Comments From mateusz at loskot dot net  2009-11-20 01:10 -------
(In reply to comment #0)
> Environment:
> * OS: Linux / Ubuntu 9.10
> * GCC: gcc(Ubuntu 4.4.1-4ubuntu8) 4.4.1
> * glibc: 2.10.1-0ubuntu15 (http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/libc6-dev)

*** CORRECTION TO ENVIRONMENT *** 

I'm terribly sorry for my mistake. I've given details of my other
machine/system. Here are correct details of system on which the problem leaks
and on which I prepared the two test programs:

* Linux Ubuntu 9.04 32-bit
* GCC 4.3.3
* glibc 2.9-4ubuntu (http://packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/libc6-dev)
* Comeau C/C++ Compiler front-end 4.3.10.1

I've also changed the glibc version to which this report applies from 2.10 to 2.9. 

I'm sorry for confusion.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|2.10                        |2.9


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10990

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.