public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "siddhesh at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [Bug libc/11787] Program with large TLS segments fail.
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 07:05:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-11787-131-1iBIINaeC7@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-11787-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11787
Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |siddhesh at redhat dot com
--- Comment #32 from Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com> 2012-05-22 07:05:05 UTC ---
Paul pointed me to this bz when I submitted a patch to fix bug 6973 and bug
6976 today:
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-05/msg01544.html
If we're looking to fix all stack size and guard related issues in this bz,
does it make sense to mark the other two bzs as duplicates of this one? I
understand Carlos is coming up with a much more comprehensive fix for this.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-22 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-11787-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2012-02-24 4:35 ` [Bug libc/11787] Program with large TLS segment fails aio_write ppluzhnikov at google dot com
2012-02-24 19:36 ` asharif.tools at gmail dot com
2012-03-22 21:48 ` asharif.tools at gmail dot com
2012-03-23 20:35 ` vapier at gentoo dot org
2012-03-23 20:37 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
2012-03-23 20:39 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
2012-03-23 21:33 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
2012-03-23 22:07 ` ppluzhnikov at google dot com
2012-03-23 22:47 ` asharif.tools at gmail dot com
2012-03-23 22:51 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
2012-03-23 23:02 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
2012-03-23 23:03 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
2012-03-24 2:22 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
2012-03-24 10:30 ` ppluzhnikov at google dot com
2012-03-24 16:10 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
2012-03-24 17:08 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
2012-03-24 17:39 ` vapier at gentoo dot org
2012-03-24 18:30 ` ppluzhnikov at google dot com
2012-03-24 20:13 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
2012-03-24 20:46 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
2012-03-24 20:57 ` ppluzhnikov at google dot com
2012-03-25 2:01 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
2012-03-25 23:16 ` vapier at gentoo dot org
2012-03-26 14:29 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2012-03-26 17:44 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
2012-03-27 21:21 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
2012-03-30 16:21 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
2012-03-30 16:46 ` law at redhat dot com
2012-03-30 21:28 ` ppluzhnikov at google dot com
2012-04-01 19:47 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
2012-04-24 22:03 ` asharif.tools at gmail dot com
2012-04-24 22:36 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
2012-04-25 2:55 ` vapier at gentoo dot org
2012-04-25 18:25 ` asharif.tools at gmail dot com
2012-04-25 20:11 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
2012-05-07 21:22 ` [Bug libc/11787] Program with large TLS segments fail carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
2012-05-17 14:11 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
2012-05-22 7:05 ` siddhesh at redhat dot com [this message]
2012-05-23 16:41 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
2012-05-23 17:09 ` siddhesh at redhat dot com
2012-05-23 17:09 ` siddhesh at redhat dot com
2012-06-05 15:15 ` ian at airs dot com
2012-11-19 6:18 ` carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
2012-12-03 23:52 ` carlos at systemhalted dot org
2012-12-03 23:53 ` carlos at systemhalted dot org
2013-04-26 18:06 ` ppluzhnikov at google dot com
2013-04-27 2:02 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2013-05-22 18:40 ` carlos at redhat dot com
2013-09-13 21:45 ` bas at bmail dot ru
2013-11-23 9:05 ` david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com
2013-11-23 9:20 ` david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com
2013-11-24 15:58 ` carlos at redhat dot com
2014-02-16 19:42 ` jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
2014-05-28 19:41 ` schwab at sourceware dot org
2014-06-30 17:33 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2014-07-02 6:06 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2015-03-23 2:50 ` andersk at mit dot edu
2015-08-22 21:36 ` [Bug dynamic-link/11787] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-15 16:23 ` john.wellesz at hiventy dot com
2021-06-19 8:05 ` a3at.mail at gmail dot com
2022-01-26 6:44 ` sam at gentoo dot org
2022-06-07 8:09 ` i at maskray dot me
2022-11-06 20:12 ` i at maskray dot me
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-11787-131-1iBIINaeC7@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
--cc=glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).