public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug build/19477] sparc64 build fails for default v9 targets: sparc64/soft-fp/qp_itoq.c requires v9a+ [not found] <bug-19477-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> @ 2024-01-17 12:43 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org 2024-01-17 13:22 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de ` (4 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org @ 2024-01-17 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19477 Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot o | |rg Target Milestone|--- |2.25 Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org> --- Since 9c8addbc1cd414711310c5a47693f5b0f0b9be3a (2.25) when building for sparc64 the build assumes VIS support (v9a). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/19477] sparc64 build fails for default v9 targets: sparc64/soft-fp/qp_itoq.c requires v9a+ [not found] <bug-19477-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> 2024-01-17 12:43 ` [Bug build/19477] sparc64 build fails for default v9 targets: sparc64/soft-fp/qp_itoq.c requires v9a+ adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org @ 2024-01-17 13:22 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de 2024-01-17 13:32 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org ` (3 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de @ 2024-01-17 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19477 --- Comment #5 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de> --- (In reply to Adhemerval Zanella from comment #4) > Since 9c8addbc1cd414711310c5a47693f5b0f0b9be3a (2.25) when building for > sparc64 the build assumes VIS support (v9a). What does that mean? Support for SPARC V9 was silently dropped? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/19477] sparc64 build fails for default v9 targets: sparc64/soft-fp/qp_itoq.c requires v9a+ [not found] <bug-19477-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> 2024-01-17 12:43 ` [Bug build/19477] sparc64 build fails for default v9 targets: sparc64/soft-fp/qp_itoq.c requires v9a+ adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org 2024-01-17 13:22 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de @ 2024-01-17 13:32 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org 2024-01-17 13:36 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org @ 2024-01-17 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19477 --- Comment #6 from Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org> --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #5) > (In reply to Adhemerval Zanella from comment #4) > > Since 9c8addbc1cd414711310c5a47693f5b0f0b9be3a (2.25) when building for > > sparc64 the build assumes VIS support (v9a). > > What does that mean? Support for SPARC V9 was silently dropped? I don't think it was even supported [1], we have VIS code forever: $ git grep "fzero" sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/ sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/fpu/multiarch/s_lrint-vis3.S: fzero ZERO sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/fpu/multiarch/s_lrintf-vis3.S: fzeros ZERO sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/fpu/multiarch/s_nearbyint-vis3.S: fzero ZERO sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/fpu/multiarch/s_nearbyintf-vis3.S: fzeros ZERO sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/fpu/multiarch/s_rint-vis3.S: fzero ZERO sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/fpu/multiarch/s_rintf-vis3.S: fzeros ZERO sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/fpu/s_lrint.S: fzero ZERO sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/fpu/s_lrintf.S: fzeros ZERO sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/fpu/s_nearbyint.S: fzero ZERO sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/fpu/s_nearbyintf.S: fzeros ZERO sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/fpu/s_rint.S: fzero ZERO sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/fpu/s_rintf.S: fzeros ZERO sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/memset.S: fzero %f0 sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/memset.S: fzero %f2 sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/sfp-machine.h: __asm__ __volatile__("fzero %%f62\n\t" \ sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/sfp-machine.h: __asm ("fzero %%f62\n\t" \ (So all the work I did for the vis3 ifunc support is pretty much useless) [1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2016-August/073651.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/19477] sparc64 build fails for default v9 targets: sparc64/soft-fp/qp_itoq.c requires v9a+ [not found] <bug-19477-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2024-01-17 13:32 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org @ 2024-01-17 13:36 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org 2024-01-17 13:40 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de 2024-01-18 4:59 ` sam at gentoo dot org 5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org @ 2024-01-17 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19477 --- Comment #7 from Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org> --- (In reply to Adhemerval Zanella from comment #6) > > (So all the work I did for the vis3 ifunc support is pretty much useless) I just recalled that the ifunc support was done for vis3, so it was not useless. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/19477] sparc64 build fails for default v9 targets: sparc64/soft-fp/qp_itoq.c requires v9a+ [not found] <bug-19477-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2024-01-17 13:36 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org @ 2024-01-17 13:40 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de 2024-01-18 4:59 ` sam at gentoo dot org 5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de @ 2024-01-17 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19477 --- Comment #8 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de> --- Hmm, I'll have to check what's the oldest UltraSPARC CPU that supports v9a and VIS. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/19477] sparc64 build fails for default v9 targets: sparc64/soft-fp/qp_itoq.c requires v9a+ [not found] <bug-19477-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2024-01-17 13:40 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de @ 2024-01-18 4:59 ` sam at gentoo dot org 5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: sam at gentoo dot org @ 2024-01-18 4:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19477 Sam James <sam at gentoo dot org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-18 4:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-19477-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2024-01-17 12:43 ` [Bug build/19477] sparc64 build fails for default v9 targets: sparc64/soft-fp/qp_itoq.c requires v9a+ adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
2024-01-17 13:22 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2024-01-17 13:32 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
2024-01-17 13:36 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
2024-01-17 13:40 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2024-01-18 4:59 ` sam at gentoo dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).