public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug dynamic-link/24080] Definition of "haswell" platform is inconsistent with GCC
[not found] <bug-24080-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2020-03-27 14:18 ` pmenzel+sourceware.org-bugzilla at molgen dot mpg.de
2020-05-11 15:08 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pmenzel+sourceware.org-bugzilla at molgen dot mpg.de @ 2020-03-27 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24080
Paul Menzel <pmenzel+sourceware.org-bugzilla at molgen dot mpg.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pmenzel+sourceware.org-bugz
| |illa at molgen dot mpg.de
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug dynamic-link/24080] Definition of "haswell" platform is inconsistent with GCC
[not found] <bug-24080-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2020-03-27 14:18 ` [Bug dynamic-link/24080] Definition of "haswell" platform is inconsistent with GCC pmenzel+sourceware.org-bugzilla at molgen dot mpg.de
@ 2020-05-11 15:08 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2020-09-30 7:21 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2020-05-11 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24080
Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fweimer at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 from Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> ---
Somewhat relevant discussion:
<https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-May/113757.html>
Fixes to "haswell" (under whatever name) would probably come under that new
umbrella, with the existing selection remaining unchanged (until it is
deprecated and then removed).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug dynamic-link/24080] Definition of "haswell" platform is inconsistent with GCC
[not found] <bug-24080-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2020-03-27 14:18 ` [Bug dynamic-link/24080] Definition of "haswell" platform is inconsistent with GCC pmenzel+sourceware.org-bugzilla at molgen dot mpg.de
2020-05-11 15:08 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
@ 2020-09-30 7:21 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2020-09-30 7:26 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2020-12-04 8:49 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2020-09-30 7:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24080
Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=97250
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug dynamic-link/24080] Definition of "haswell" platform is inconsistent with GCC
[not found] <bug-24080-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-09-30 7:21 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
@ 2020-09-30 7:26 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2020-12-04 8:49 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2020-09-30 7:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24080
Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://bugs.llvm.org/show_
| |bug.cgi?id=47686
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug dynamic-link/24080] Definition of "haswell" platform is inconsistent with GCC
[not found] <bug-24080-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-09-30 7:26 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
@ 2020-12-04 8:49 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2020-12-04 8:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24080
Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |fweimer at redhat dot com
Target Milestone|--- |2.33
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #3 from Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> ---
I consider this fixed by:
commit f267e1c9dd7fb8852cc32d6eafd96bbcfd5cbb2b
Author: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Dec 4 09:13:43 2020 +0100
x86_64: Add glibc-hwcaps support
The subdirectories match those in the x86-64 psABI:
https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/x86-64-ABI/-/commit/77566eb03bc6a326811cb7e9a6b9396884b67c7c
Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
“x86-64-v3” is more or less a replacement for the “haswell” AT_PLATFORM
subdirectory.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-12-04 8:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-24080-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2020-03-27 14:18 ` [Bug dynamic-link/24080] Definition of "haswell" platform is inconsistent with GCC pmenzel+sourceware.org-bugzilla at molgen dot mpg.de
2020-05-11 15:08 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2020-09-30 7:21 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2020-09-30 7:26 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2020-12-04 8:49 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).