public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug dynamic-link/24080] Definition of "haswell" platform is inconsistent with GCC [not found] <bug-24080-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> @ 2020-03-27 14:18 ` pmenzel+sourceware.org-bugzilla at molgen dot mpg.de 2020-05-11 15:08 ` fweimer at redhat dot com ` (3 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: pmenzel+sourceware.org-bugzilla at molgen dot mpg.de @ 2020-03-27 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24080 Paul Menzel <pmenzel+sourceware.org-bugzilla at molgen dot mpg.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pmenzel+sourceware.org-bugz | |illa at molgen dot mpg.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug dynamic-link/24080] Definition of "haswell" platform is inconsistent with GCC [not found] <bug-24080-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> 2020-03-27 14:18 ` [Bug dynamic-link/24080] Definition of "haswell" platform is inconsistent with GCC pmenzel+sourceware.org-bugzilla at molgen dot mpg.de @ 2020-05-11 15:08 ` fweimer at redhat dot com 2020-09-30 7:21 ` fweimer at redhat dot com ` (2 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2020-05-11 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24080 Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fweimer at redhat dot com --- Comment #2 from Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> --- Somewhat relevant discussion: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-May/113757.html> Fixes to "haswell" (under whatever name) would probably come under that new umbrella, with the existing selection remaining unchanged (until it is deprecated and then removed). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug dynamic-link/24080] Definition of "haswell" platform is inconsistent with GCC [not found] <bug-24080-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> 2020-03-27 14:18 ` [Bug dynamic-link/24080] Definition of "haswell" platform is inconsistent with GCC pmenzel+sourceware.org-bugzilla at molgen dot mpg.de 2020-05-11 15:08 ` fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2020-09-30 7:21 ` fweimer at redhat dot com 2020-09-30 7:26 ` fweimer at redhat dot com 2020-12-04 8:49 ` fweimer at redhat dot com 4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2020-09-30 7:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24080 Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill | |a/show_bug.cgi?id=97250 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug dynamic-link/24080] Definition of "haswell" platform is inconsistent with GCC [not found] <bug-24080-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2020-09-30 7:21 ` fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2020-09-30 7:26 ` fweimer at redhat dot com 2020-12-04 8:49 ` fweimer at redhat dot com 4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2020-09-30 7:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24080 Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.llvm.org/show_ | |bug.cgi?id=47686 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug dynamic-link/24080] Definition of "haswell" platform is inconsistent with GCC [not found] <bug-24080-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2020-09-30 7:26 ` fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2020-12-04 8:49 ` fweimer at redhat dot com 4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2020-12-04 8:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24080 Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |fweimer at redhat dot com Target Milestone|--- |2.33 Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> --- I consider this fixed by: commit f267e1c9dd7fb8852cc32d6eafd96bbcfd5cbb2b Author: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> Date: Fri Dec 4 09:13:43 2020 +0100 x86_64: Add glibc-hwcaps support The subdirectories match those in the x86-64 psABI: https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/x86-64-ABI/-/commit/77566eb03bc6a326811cb7e9a6b9396884b67c7c Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> “x86-64-v3” is more or less a replacement for the “haswell” AT_PLATFORM subdirectory. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-12-04 8:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-24080-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2020-03-27 14:18 ` [Bug dynamic-link/24080] Definition of "haswell" platform is inconsistent with GCC pmenzel+sourceware.org-bugzilla at molgen dot mpg.de
2020-05-11 15:08 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2020-09-30 7:21 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2020-09-30 7:26 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2020-12-04 8:49 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).