public inbox for gnu-gabi@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suprateeka R Hegde <hegdesmailbox@gmail.com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>
Cc: gnu-gabi@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: OSABI on Linux Distros
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a7ffb9cb-b876-4165-71ca-a76a13b3255f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160610212256.D5A772C39F7@topped-with-meat.com>



On 11-Jun-2016 02:52 AM, Roland McGrath wrote:
>> What is the reason why we emit OSABI value as "UNIX - System V"
>> (ELFOSABI_SYSV) even on GNU/Linux systems? Shouldn't it be just "GNU"
>> (ELFOSABI_GNU)?
>
> In GNU systems the use of this field is specifically to indicate that
> certain GNU extensions to ELF are used in the particular object.  In
> particular, if any .dynsym entries use STT_GNU_IFUNC o STB_GNU_UNIQUE,
> then e_ident[EI_OSABI] must be ELFOSABI_GNU.

OK. I understood this part. But then I did not know this set is partial. 
I thought use of *any* GNU specific extension should mark it as GNU OSABI.

For instance, GNU_RELRO, GNU_EH_FRAME, GNU_STACK, etc. Even with all 
these, it is still marked SYSV ABI.

So,

1. Do we have a documented list of GNU extensions that are necessary to 
mark an ELF as GNU ABI?
2. Why the list is partial? Why not all GNU extensions?

--
Supra

   Otherwise, it can be
> ELFOSABI_NONE (aka ELFOSABI_SYSV).  In fact, it should be, and the
> tools (linkers) implement that distinction.  This makes it possible
> for current tools (without special switches or whatnot) to produce
> binaries that are compatible with older dynamic linker implementations
> that did not support these GNU extensions to ELF.
>
> This is arguably a bad overloading of the original instead of
> EI_OSABI, but it's what's been done for GNU systems and so now it's an
> unchangeable part of the GNU ELF gABI.
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-11  6:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-01  0:00 Suprateeka R Hegde
2016-01-01  0:00 ` Roland McGrath
2016-01-01  0:00   ` Carlos O'Donell
2016-01-01  0:00     ` Suprateeka R Hegde
2016-01-01  0:00   ` Suprateeka R Hegde [this message]
2016-01-01  0:00     ` Carlos O'Donell
2016-01-01  0:00       ` Suprateeka R Hegde
2016-01-01  0:00         ` Carlos O'Donell
2016-01-01  0:00           ` Suprateeka R Hegde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a7ffb9cb-b876-4165-71ca-a76a13b3255f@gmail.com \
    --to=hegdesmailbox@gmail.com \
    --cc=gnu-gabi@sourceware.org \
    --cc=roland@hack.frob.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).