* chebyshev and specfunc: naive question
@ 2008-04-07 18:41 Jerome BENOIT
2008-04-08 21:08 ` Brian Gough
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jerome BENOIT @ 2008-04-07 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gsl-discuss
Hello List,
I have gone through the specfunc sources:
why an ad hoc chebyshev package is used rather than
the one provided by GSL itself ?
Thanks in advance,
Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT
jgmbenoit_at_mailsnare_dot_net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: chebyshev and specfunc: naive question
2008-04-07 18:41 chebyshev and specfunc: naive question Jerome BENOIT
@ 2008-04-08 21:08 ` Brian Gough
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Brian Gough @ 2008-04-08 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jgmbenoit; +Cc: gsl-discuss
At Mon, 07 Apr 2008 19:51:27 +0800,
Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> I have gone through the specfunc sources:
> why an ad hoc chebyshev package is used rather than
> the one provided by GSL itself ?
So that it can be static-inlined, and to use gsl_sf_result.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-04-08 21:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-04-07 18:41 chebyshev and specfunc: naive question Jerome BENOIT
2008-04-08 21:08 ` Brian Gough
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).