* [Bug libgcj/10353] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] Java testsuite failures Array_3, TLtest, Thread_Join, Thread_Wait_Interrupt & Throw_2
[not found] <20030408184601.10353.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
@ 2004-10-30 19:31 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-17 11:22 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-30 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-30 19:31 -------
Still no movement from Java folks; postponed until GCC 3.4.4.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to fail|3.3.3 3.4.0 4.0 |3.3.3 3.4.0 4.0.0
Target Milestone|3.4.3 |3.4.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10353
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/10353] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] Java testsuite failures Array_3, TLtest, Thread_Join, Thread_Wait_Interrupt & Throw_2
[not found] <20030408184601.10353.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
2004-10-30 19:31 ` [Bug libgcj/10353] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] Java testsuite failures Array_3, TLtest, Thread_Join, Thread_Wait_Interrupt & Throw_2 mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-12-17 11:22 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-03 19:04 ` [Bug libgcj/10353] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] Java testsuite failures ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-17 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-17 11:22 -------
On Solaris 7, 8 and 9 with 3.4.4pre, we are down to:
32-bit:
=== libjava tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: Array_3 execution - gij test
FAIL: Array_3 execution - gij test
=== libjava Summary ===
# of expected passes 3262
# of unexpected failures 2
# of expected failures 10
# of untested testcases 10
64-bit:
FAIL: Array_3 execution - gij test
FAIL: Array_3 execution - gij test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - source compiled test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - gij test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - bytecode->native test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest -O3 execution - source compiled test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - gij test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest -O3 execution - bytecode->native test
=== libjava Summary ===
# of expected passes 3249
# of unexpected failures 8
# of expected failures 10
# of untested testcases 17
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10353
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/10353] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] Java testsuite failures
[not found] <20030408184601.10353.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
2004-10-30 19:31 ` [Bug libgcj/10353] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] Java testsuite failures Array_3, TLtest, Thread_Join, Thread_Wait_Interrupt & Throw_2 mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-17 11:22 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-03 19:04 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-17 23:49 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-03 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-03 19:04 -------
I'm finally taking over this one and turning it into the generic PR for Java
failures on SPARC/Solaris. We're in better shape on the 3.4 branch than on the
3.3 branch (2 vs 16 in 32-bit mode, 8 vs 8 in 64-bit mode) and mainline is
converging towards the 3.4 results.
Retargeting to 4.0.0 as the remaining failures are not fixable without switching
to proper unwinding from signal handlers (i.e. can_unwind_signal=yes).
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot|
|org |
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
GCC build triplet|sparc-sun-solaris2.7 |sparc-sun-solaris2.*
GCC host triplet|sparc-sun-solaris2.7 |sparc-sun-solaris2.*
GCC target triplet|sparc-sun-solaris2.7 |sparc-sun-solaris2.*
Summary|[3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] |[3.3/3.4/4.0 regression]
|Java testsuite failures |Java testsuite failures
|Array_3, TLtest, |
|Thread_Join, |
|Thread_Wait_Interrupt & |
|Throw_2 |
Target Milestone|3.4.4 |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10353
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/10353] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] Java testsuite failures
[not found] <20030408184601.10353.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-03 19:04 ` [Bug libgcj/10353] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] Java testsuite failures ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-17 23:49 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-28 21:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-17 23:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-17 23:49 -------
Mainline as of 01/15:
32-bit:
=== libjava tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: Array_3 execution - gij test
FAIL: Array_3 execution - gij test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - source compiled test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - bytecode->native test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest -O3 execution - source compiled test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest -O3 execution - bytecode->native test
=== libjava Summary ===
# of expected passes 3708
# of unexpected failures 6
# of expected failures 14
# of untested testcases 22
64-bit:
=== libjava tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: Array_3 execution - gij test
FAIL: Array_3 execution - gij test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - source compiled test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - gij test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - bytecode->native test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest -O3 execution - source compiled test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - gij test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest -O3 execution - bytecode->native test
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: Process_3 execution - source compiled test
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: Process_3 execution - bytecode->native test
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: Process_3 -O3 execution - source compiled test
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: Process_3 execution - gij test
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: Process_3 -O3 execution - bytecode->native test
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: Process_5 execution - source compiled test
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: Process_5 execution - gij test
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: Process_5 execution - bytecode->native test
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: Process_5 -O3 execution - source compiled test
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: Process_5 execution - gij test
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: Process_5 -O3 execution - bytecode->native test
FAIL: Throw_2 execution - gij test
FAIL: Throw_2 execution - gij test
=== libjava Summary ===
# of expected passes 3678
# of unexpected failures 21
# of expected failures 14
# of untested testcases 37
FileHandleGcTest failures are ramdomly present on all branches, depending on the
phase of the moon, and they don't really count. So the 32-bit testsuite is
regression-free.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10353
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/10353] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] Java testsuite failures
[not found] <20030408184601.10353.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-17 23:49 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-28 21:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-16 18:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-28 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-28 21:04 -------
Removing target milestone as this is a java related problem and per: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/
2005-01/msg01255.html>.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.0.0 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10353
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/10353] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] Java testsuite failures
[not found] <20030408184601.10353.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-28 21:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-16 18:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-16 18:47 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-16 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16 04:55 -------
The Process_* failure should be fixed by:
2005-02-15 David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com>
Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay@redhat.com>
* prims.cc (_Jv_CreateJavaVM): Add comment about initialization order.
* posix-threads.cc (_Jv_InitThreads): Call block_sigchld() here to
ensure that GC threads inherit the new signal mask.
(block_sigchld): Call JvFail rather than throwing exception if
pthread_sigmask() fails.
But since none of us have solaris we could not test it.
The following thread is where this patch comes from:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q1/msg00415.html
So which testcases are regressions now (well just to make sure that I don't make a mistake when the
next one gets fixed)?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10353
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/10353] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] Java testsuite failures
[not found] <20030408184601.10353.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-16 18:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-16 18:47 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-22 4:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-16 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16 07:31 -------
> But since none of us have solaris we could not test it.
Not sure what you meant with "us", we are all GCC hackers here.
> So which testcases are regressions now (well just to make sure that I don't
> make a mistake when the next one gets fixed)?
The nominal mainline status as of today on Solaris 7, 8 and 9 is
32-bit:
=== libjava tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: Array_3 execution - gij test
FAIL: Array_3 execution - gij test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - source compiled test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - gij test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - bytecode->native test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest -O3 execution - source compiled test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - gij test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest -O3 execution - bytecode->native test
=== libjava Summary ===
# of expected passes 3710
# of unexpected failures 8
# of expected failures 14
# of untested testcases 22
64-bit:
=== libjava tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: Array_3 execution - gij test
FAIL: Array_3 execution - gij test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - source compiled test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - gij test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - bytecode->native test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest -O3 execution - source compiled test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - gij test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest -O3 execution - bytecode->native test
FAIL: Throw_2 execution - gij test
FAIL: Throw_2 execution - gij test
=== libjava Summary ===
# of expected passes 3708
# of unexpected failures 10
# of expected failures 14
# of untested testcases 37
that is, we are on par with the GCC 3.3.x and GCC 3.4.x results there. We still
have new regressions on Solaris 2.5.1 and 2.6 that I'm going to investigate.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10353
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/10353] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] Java testsuite failures
[not found] <20030408184601.10353.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-16 18:47 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-22 4:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-05 19:52 ` [Bug libgcj/10353] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-22 4:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-21 08:13 -------
Subject: Bug 10353
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org 2005-02-21 08:12:39
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog configure.in configure
Log message:
PR libgcj/10353
* configure.in (noconfigdirs) <sparc-*-solaris2.[0-6]>: Add libgcj.
* configure: Regenerate.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1054&r2=1.1055
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/configure.in.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.339&r2=1.340
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/configure.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.202&r2=1.203
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10353
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/10353] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Java testsuite failures
[not found] <20030408184601.10353.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-22 4:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-05 19:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-15 22:25 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-05 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10353
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/10353] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Java testsuite failures
[not found] <20030408184601.10353.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2005-03-05 19:52 ` [Bug libgcj/10353] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-04-15 22:25 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-17 12:59 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-18 14:55 ` mckinlay at redhat dot com
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-04-15 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-15 22:25 -------
PR libgcj/6461 was opened for the
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - source compiled test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - gij test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - bytecode->native test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest -O3 execution - source compiled test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - gij test
FAIL: FileHandleGcTest -O3 execution - bytecode->native test
failures and subsequently suspended.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |6461
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10353
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/10353] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Java testsuite failures
[not found] <20030408184601.10353.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2005-04-15 22:25 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-04-17 12:59 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-18 14:55 ` mckinlay at redhat dot com
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-04-17 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17 12:59 -------
According to Andrew, the
FAIL: Array_3 execution - gij test
FAIL: Array_3 execution - gij test
failures are expected: "optimization is allowed to delete load insns whose
result is unused, even if those load insns might trap."
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10353
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/10353] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Java testsuite failures
[not found] <20030408184601.10353.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2005-04-17 12:59 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-04-18 14:55 ` mckinlay at redhat dot com
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: mckinlay at redhat dot com @ 2005-04-18 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2005-04-18 14:55 -------
I don't think a gij test failure is expected. Array_3 is known to fail when
native compiled, however.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10353
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread