* [Bug libgcj/20504] java.util.regex implementation doesn't support quoting constructs
2005-03-16 22:27 [Bug libgcj/20504] New: java.util.regex implementation doesn't support quoting constructs overholt at redhat dot com
@ 2005-03-17 0:01 ` overholt at redhat dot com
2005-03-17 0:33 ` overholt at redhat dot com
` (12 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: overholt at redhat dot com @ 2005-03-17 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat dot com 2005-03-16 21:50 -------
Created an attachment (id=8406)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8406&action=view)
Patch for quoting constructs (from Ziga's CP bug)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20504
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/20504] java.util.regex implementation doesn't support quoting constructs
2005-03-16 22:27 [Bug libgcj/20504] New: java.util.regex implementation doesn't support quoting constructs overholt at redhat dot com
2005-03-17 0:01 ` [Bug libgcj/20504] " overholt at redhat dot com
@ 2005-03-17 0:33 ` overholt at redhat dot com
2005-03-17 1:29 ` mckinlay at redhat dot com
` (11 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: overholt at redhat dot com @ 2005-03-17 0:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat dot com 2005-03-16 21:51 -------
Created an attachment (id=8407)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8407&action=view)
Mauve test cases for java.util.regex (from Ziga's CP bug)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20504
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/20504] java.util.regex implementation doesn't support quoting constructs
2005-03-16 22:27 [Bug libgcj/20504] New: java.util.regex implementation doesn't support quoting constructs overholt at redhat dot com
2005-03-17 0:01 ` [Bug libgcj/20504] " overholt at redhat dot com
2005-03-17 0:33 ` overholt at redhat dot com
@ 2005-03-17 1:29 ` mckinlay at redhat dot com
2005-03-17 2:17 ` ziga dot mahkovec at klika dot si
` (10 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: mckinlay at redhat dot com @ 2005-03-17 1:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2005-03-16 22:27 -------
The patch looks reasonable to me. Is the quoting feature something that should
be used in Perl style regular expressions as well, or is this a difference
between Perl-style and Java-style? If it is a difference, this feature should
only be enabled when RE_SYNTAX_JAVA_1_4 is enabled.
Ziga, do you have a copyright assignment for GNU Classpath? This patch will need
a changelog entry, too?
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ziga dot mahkovec at klika
| |dot si
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-03-16 22:27:24
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20504
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/20504] java.util.regex implementation doesn't support quoting constructs
2005-03-16 22:27 [Bug libgcj/20504] New: java.util.regex implementation doesn't support quoting constructs overholt at redhat dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-03-17 1:29 ` mckinlay at redhat dot com
@ 2005-03-17 2:17 ` ziga dot mahkovec at klika dot si
2005-03-17 2:22 ` mckinlay at redhat dot com
` (9 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: ziga dot mahkovec at klika dot si @ 2005-03-17 2:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From ziga dot mahkovec at klika dot si 2005-03-17 00:33 -------
The quoting constructs are used in Perl as well [1]:
"\Q quote (disable) pattern metacharacters till \E"
I'm attaching the ChangeLog entry. And my GNU Classpath copyright assignment is
in processing.
[1] http://www.perl.com/doc/manual/html/pod/perlre.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20504
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/20504] java.util.regex implementation doesn't support quoting constructs
2005-03-16 22:27 [Bug libgcj/20504] New: java.util.regex implementation doesn't support quoting constructs overholt at redhat dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-03-17 2:17 ` ziga dot mahkovec at klika dot si
@ 2005-03-17 2:22 ` mckinlay at redhat dot com
2005-04-20 15:56 ` mckinlay at redhat dot com
` (8 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: mckinlay at redhat dot com @ 2005-03-17 2:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2005-03-17 01:29 -------
Please make sure the ChangeLog is properly formatted. You're missing the name of
the changed method, and a "*" beside the filename. We're quite picky about this ;-)
Otherwise, the patch looks great. Please check it in once your assignment
paperwork is complete. Thanks!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20504
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/20504] java.util.regex implementation doesn't support quoting constructs
2005-03-16 22:27 [Bug libgcj/20504] New: java.util.regex implementation doesn't support quoting constructs overholt at redhat dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-03-17 2:22 ` mckinlay at redhat dot com
@ 2005-04-20 15:56 ` mckinlay at redhat dot com
2005-04-20 16:24 ` ziga dot mahkovec at klika dot si
` (7 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: mckinlay at redhat dot com @ 2005-04-20 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2005-04-20 15:56 -------
Ziga, please let us know as soon as your FSF paperwork clears. Thanks!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20504
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/20504] java.util.regex implementation doesn't support quoting constructs
2005-03-16 22:27 [Bug libgcj/20504] New: java.util.regex implementation doesn't support quoting constructs overholt at redhat dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-04-20 15:56 ` mckinlay at redhat dot com
@ 2005-04-20 16:24 ` ziga dot mahkovec at klika dot si
2005-05-04 14:29 ` overholt at redhat dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: ziga dot mahkovec at klika dot si @ 2005-04-20 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From ziga dot mahkovec at klika dot si 2005-04-20 16:24 -------
Bryce,
about a month ago, I was informed that my papers were to be sent shortly. I
forgot about it later, but I poked the copyright clerk now.
Let me know if there's anything I can do to speed things up (like putting the
patch in public domain for you to commit?).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20504
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/20504] java.util.regex implementation doesn't support quoting constructs
2005-03-16 22:27 [Bug libgcj/20504] New: java.util.regex implementation doesn't support quoting constructs overholt at redhat dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-04-20 16:24 ` ziga dot mahkovec at klika dot si
@ 2005-05-04 14:29 ` overholt at redhat dot com
2005-05-04 15:01 ` ziga dot mahkovec at klika dot si
` (5 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: overholt at redhat dot com @ 2005-05-04 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat dot com 2005-05-04 14:28 -------
Any news here?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20504
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/20504] java.util.regex implementation doesn't support quoting constructs
2005-03-16 22:27 [Bug libgcj/20504] New: java.util.regex implementation doesn't support quoting constructs overholt at redhat dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-04 14:29 ` overholt at redhat dot com
@ 2005-05-04 15:01 ` ziga dot mahkovec at klika dot si
2005-05-16 16:03 ` mark at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: ziga dot mahkovec at klika dot si @ 2005-05-04 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From ziga dot mahkovec at klika dot si 2005-05-04 15:01 -------
My copyright papers were resent and arrived successfully this time. This was
about a week ago (and I returned them immediately) so I expect the confirmation
Real Soon Now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20504
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/20504] java.util.regex implementation doesn't support quoting constructs
2005-03-16 22:27 [Bug libgcj/20504] New: java.util.regex implementation doesn't support quoting constructs overholt at redhat dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-04 15:01 ` ziga dot mahkovec at klika dot si
@ 2005-05-16 16:03 ` mark at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-16 19:02 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: mark at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-16 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From mark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-16 16:03 -------
The paperwork cleared with the FSF.
There was a glitch in the new "fully-automatic" system.
Apologies.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20504
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/20504] java.util.regex implementation doesn't support quoting constructs
2005-03-16 22:27 [Bug libgcj/20504] New: java.util.regex implementation doesn't support quoting constructs overholt at redhat dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-16 16:03 ` mark at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-16 19:02 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-16 19:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-16 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-16 19:02 -------
Subject: Bug 20504
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: tromey@gcc.gnu.org 2005-05-16 19:01:52
Modified files:
libjava : ChangeLog
libjava/gnu/regexp: RE.java
Log message:
2005-05-16 Ziga Mahkovec <ziga.mahkovec@klika.si>
PR libgcj/20504
gnu/regexp/RE.java: Add support for quoting constructs.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libjava/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3614&r2=1.3615
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libjava/gnu/regexp/RE.java.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3&r2=1.4
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20504
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/20504] java.util.regex implementation doesn't support quoting constructs
2005-03-16 22:27 [Bug libgcj/20504] New: java.util.regex implementation doesn't support quoting constructs overholt at redhat dot com
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-16 19:02 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-16 19:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-16 19:06 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-16 19:18 ` ziga dot mahkovec at klika dot si
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-16 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-16 19:03 -------
Subject: Bug 20504
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: tromey@gcc.gnu.org 2005-05-16 19:03:02
Modified files:
libjava : ChangeLog
libjava/gnu/regexp: RE.java
Log message:
2005-05-16 Ziga Mahkovec <ziga.mahkovec@klika.si>
PR libgcj/20504
gnu/regexp/RE.java: Add support for quoting constructs.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libjava/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.3391.2.66&r2=1.3391.2.67
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libjava/gnu/regexp/RE.java.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.3&r2=1.3.2.1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20504
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/20504] java.util.regex implementation doesn't support quoting constructs
2005-03-16 22:27 [Bug libgcj/20504] New: java.util.regex implementation doesn't support quoting constructs overholt at redhat dot com
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-16 19:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-16 19:06 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-16 19:18 ` ziga dot mahkovec at klika dot si
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-16 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-16 19:06 -------
I checked this in everywhere.
Thanks for taking the time to write the test cases, that is excellent.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20504
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/20504] java.util.regex implementation doesn't support quoting constructs
2005-03-16 22:27 [Bug libgcj/20504] New: java.util.regex implementation doesn't support quoting constructs overholt at redhat dot com
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-16 19:06 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-16 19:18 ` ziga dot mahkovec at klika dot si
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: ziga dot mahkovec at klika dot si @ 2005-05-16 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Additional Comments From ziga dot mahkovec at klika dot si 2005-05-16 19:18 -------
> I checked this in everywhere.
I was about to go through the procedure myself, but thanks anyway.
There was a typo in my initial ChangeLog entry though:
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
2005-03-17 Ziga Mahkovec <ziga.mahkovec@klika.si>
PR libgcj/20504
- gnu/regexp/RE.java: Add support for quoting constructs.
+ * gnu/regexp/RE.java: Add support for quoting constructs.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20504
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread