public inbox for java-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libgcj/25016]  New: Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait
@ 2005-11-24 11:47 aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-24 11:48 ` [Bug libgcj/25016] " aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (7 more replies)
  0 siblings, 8 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-24 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: java-prs

_Jv_CondWait makes no allowances for the possibility of an integer
overflow, and this means we can return too early.

This causes very hard to track down bugs.  See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=161483


-- 
           Summary: Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libgcj
        AssignedTo: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25016


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug libgcj/25016] Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait
  2005-11-24 11:47 [Bug libgcj/25016] New: Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-24 11:48 ` [Bug libgcj/25016] " aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-24 11:48 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-24 11:54 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-24 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: java-prs



------- Comment #1 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-24 11:48 -------
Consider this program:


public class TimedWait
{
  public static void main (String[] argv)
    throws InterruptedException
  {
    Object o = new Object();

    synchronized (o)
      {
        o.wait(Long.MAX_VALUE);
      }
  }
}


It's obvious that we never expect this program to terminate, because
the delay is some 292 million years.  However, try this on gcj and it
returns immediately -- because _Jv_CondWait is broken.


-- 

aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2005-11-24 11:48:04
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25016


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug libgcj/25016] Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait
  2005-11-24 11:47 [Bug libgcj/25016] New: Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-24 11:48 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-24 11:48 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-24 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: java-prs



------- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-24 11:48 -------
Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q4/msg00222.html


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25016


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug libgcj/25016] Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait
  2005-11-24 11:47 [Bug libgcj/25016] New: Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-24 11:48 ` [Bug libgcj/25016] " aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-24 11:48 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-24 11:54 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-24 15:21 ` overholt at redhat dot com
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-24 11:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: java-prs



-- 

aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |critical
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2005-11-24 11:48:04         |2005-11-24 11:54:14
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25016


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug libgcj/25016] Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait
  2005-11-24 11:47 [Bug libgcj/25016] New: Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-11-24 11:54 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-24 15:21 ` overholt at redhat dot com
  2005-11-25 16:18 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: overholt at redhat dot com @ 2005-11-24 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: java-prs



------- Comment #3 from overholt at redhat dot com  2005-11-24 15:21 -------
This test case does not work for me when I have not applied the patch.  After
application and building, it does appear to run "forever" :)

Also, the Eclipse issue that spurred this on (referenced in comment #1) is
fixed when I run with a patched gcc RPM set.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25016


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug libgcj/25016] Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait
  2005-11-24 11:47 [Bug libgcj/25016] New: Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-11-24 15:21 ` overholt at redhat dot com
@ 2005-11-25 16:18 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-25 16:31 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-25 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: java-prs



------- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-25 16:18 -------
Subject: Bug 25016

Author: aph
Date: Fri Nov 25 16:18:17 2005
New Revision: 107509

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107509
Log:
2005-11-25  Andrew Haley  <aph@redhat.com>

        PR libgcj/25016
        * posix-threads.cc (_Jv_CondWait): Rewrite calculation of the
        struct timespec we pass to pthread_cond_timedwait.


Modified:
    trunk/libjava/ChangeLog
    trunk/libjava/posix-threads.cc


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25016


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug libgcj/25016] Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait
  2005-11-24 11:47 [Bug libgcj/25016] New: Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-11-25 16:18 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-25 16:31 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-25 17:20 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-29 17:13 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-25 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: java-prs



------- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-25 16:31 -------
Subject: Bug 25016

Author: aph
Date: Fri Nov 25 16:31:09 2005
New Revision: 107510

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107510
Log:
2005-11-25  Andrew Haley  <aph@redhat.com>

        PR libgcj/25016
        * posix-threads.cc (_Jv_CondWait): Rewrite calculation of the
        struct timespec we pass to pthread_cond_timedwait.


Modified:
    branches/gcc-4_0-branch/libjava/ChangeLog
    branches/gcc-4_0-branch/libjava/posix-threads.cc


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25016


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug libgcj/25016] Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait
  2005-11-24 11:47 [Bug libgcj/25016] New: Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-11-25 16:31 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-25 17:20 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-29 17:13 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-25 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: java-prs



------- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-25 17:20 -------
Subject: Bug 25016

Author: aph
Date: Fri Nov 25 17:20:09 2005
New Revision: 107511

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107511
Log:
2005-11-25  Andrew Haley  <aph@redhat.com>

        PR libgcj/25016
        * posix-threads.cc (_Jv_CondWait): Rewrite calculation of the
        struct timespec we pass to pthread_cond_timedwait.


Modified:
    branches/gcc-4_1-branch/libjava/ChangeLog
    branches/gcc-4_1-branch/libjava/posix-threads.cc


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25016


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug libgcj/25016] Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait
  2005-11-24 11:47 [Bug libgcj/25016] New: Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-11-25 17:20 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-29 17:13 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-29 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: java-prs



------- Comment #7 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-29 17:13 -------
Fix checked in everywhere.


-- 

tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.0.3


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25016


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-29 17:13 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-11-24 11:47 [Bug libgcj/25016] New: Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-24 11:48 ` [Bug libgcj/25016] " aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-24 11:48 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-24 11:54 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-24 15:21 ` overholt at redhat dot com
2005-11-25 16:18 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-25 16:31 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-25 17:20 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-29 17:13 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).