From: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
To: Bryce McKinlay <bmckinlay@gmail.com>
Cc: Dehao Chen <dehao@google.com>, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>,
Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>,
Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, David Li <davidxl@google.com>,
java@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Set correct source location for deallocator calls
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 16:40:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50462ED2.30007@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALUNu-qXtr3pSTa8j60nD4Y4QK6VNAEOaPh34RRd4qt671gzkA@mail.gmail.com>
On 09/04/2012 05:32 PM, Bryce McKinlay wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Dehao Chen <dehao@google.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On 08/30/2012 08:20 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>>> Is the problem simply that the logic to
>>>> scan the assembly code isn't present in the libgcj testsuite?
>>>
>>> Yes, exactly.
>>
>> For this case, I don't think that we want a testcase to rely on
>> addr2line in the system. So how about that that we add a test when
>> assembly scan is available in libgcj testsuit?
>
> Once Ian Lance Taylor's libbacktrace patch is integrated (see:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-08/msg00317.html), we'll be able to get
> rid of the code that calls addr2line from libgcj.
As I understand it, Ian Taylor's backtrace patch is intended for use in
gcc development, and as he puts it "Since its use in GCC would
be purely for GCC developers, it's not essential that it be fully
portable." Not for gcj runtime.
Andrew.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-04 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAO2gOZXfnETUe4wqjT7p6fd61hXreu9PDfqKxNz+HxpE0E7K0g@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAO2gOZX_hZ1m0xKvxUg+6gWTOX4V5ok-vvCEg3Vhfpt=qXj8-g@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAFiYyc00wud5Oa3k51ntm8KeZHZnfm4rpnBsOJjURZMcoqFdTA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <50228C38.5080703@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <CAO2gOZUbkTsnJ2fwgeNhcRmxkzzJEifECeiF=_YRUjeKDeRMdA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <502294A1.3060800@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <50243480.7090803@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <CAO2gOZURCuWUk2MVwCwmwrijNzWxJt3q=HUpU7=Qv6zB9e-uqA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <50254A50.8070208@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <CAO2gOZXhHuFGJ0z=jvkYKZ84EoDaPSYVjxS7QzGore56SyhWyQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <50255B35.9020705@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <CAO2gOZWe+qMrVyvOoo7Ek-di0NKZxxU4Z=pqrDCqqCCAfctZOw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <50258712.4070002@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <CAO2gOZUQQjmKtooyXXAfgFoNVbeNwtT+P=E7pQ6jC=e07Nsr2g@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAO2gOZX-Gn+b6LEzps5zxhgmwQWcJ-zFqG=a7hesW6fbVyxZYQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <502E6774.8050609@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <CAO2gOZWhueDAShNLbNcJpkHA6QqXk1LNZhEMFvfT77aTZTCH9w@mail.gmail.com>
2012-08-30 14:28 ` Richard Henderson
2012-08-30 14:45 ` Bryce McKinlay
2012-08-30 15:20 ` Andrew Haley
2012-08-30 16:33 ` Richard Henderson
2012-09-04 16:07 ` Dehao Chen
2012-09-04 16:22 ` Andrew Haley
2012-09-04 20:40 ` Dehao Chen
2012-09-04 16:32 ` Bryce McKinlay
2012-09-04 16:40 ` Andrew Haley [this message]
2012-09-04 17:08 ` Bryce McKinlay
2012-09-04 17:12 ` Andrew Haley
2012-09-04 17:17 ` Bryce McKinlay
2012-09-04 17:21 ` Andrew Haley
2012-09-04 20:32 ` Dehao Chen
2012-09-05 7:29 ` Andrew Haley
2012-09-05 7:31 ` Andrew Pinski
2012-09-05 9:58 ` Mark Wielaard
2012-09-08 21:42 ` Dehao Chen
2012-09-14 15:14 ` Dehao Chen
2012-09-14 15:20 ` Andrew Haley
2012-09-15 4:25 ` H.J. Lu
2012-09-15 4:27 ` H.J. Lu
2012-09-15 4:27 ` Andrew Pinski
2012-09-15 12:55 ` H.J. Lu
2012-09-15 16:09 ` Dehao Chen
2012-09-15 18:06 ` H.J. Lu
2012-09-15 22:03 ` Dehao Chen
2012-09-15 22:31 ` Mark Wielaard
2012-09-15 22:39 ` Mark Wielaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50462ED2.30007@redhat.com \
--to=aph@redhat.com \
--cc=bmckinlay@gmail.com \
--cc=davidxl@google.com \
--cc=dehao@google.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=java@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=rth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).