From: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
To: Bryce McKinlay <bmckinlay@gmail.com>
Cc: Dehao Chen <dehao@google.com>, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>,
Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>,
Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, David Li <davidxl@google.com>,
java@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Set correct source location for deallocator calls
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 17:21:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50463875.7000006@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALUNu-oP9dqG63EHyN18gYj4P3gwrrJcp4Zgrz-pABNxabmsCg@mail.gmail.com>
On 09/04/2012 06:17 PM, Bryce McKinlay wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>> He's also planning to use it for libgo, and other gcc runtime libs
>>> have indicated interest. It doesn't have to work on all platforms, and
>>> I can't see how it would be any less portable than addr2line!
>>
>> I certainly can. Maybe once it's shaken-down so it's at least as
>> robust as what we have now it'll be OK. I suspect it hasn't had much
>> testing with, for example, unwinding through signal handlers.
>
> libgcj wouldn't actually use it for unwinding, we already have all
> that. We'd just use it to read DWARF debug info and give us the source
> code line numbers.
OK, as long as that's all it does. I think I was perhaps a bit
misled by its description of "a stack backtrace library". It
certainly looks like a nicer approach than addr2line, but is
going to be much less well-ported. I guess we'll see how it goes.
Andrew.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-04 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAO2gOZXfnETUe4wqjT7p6fd61hXreu9PDfqKxNz+HxpE0E7K0g@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAO2gOZX_hZ1m0xKvxUg+6gWTOX4V5ok-vvCEg3Vhfpt=qXj8-g@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAFiYyc00wud5Oa3k51ntm8KeZHZnfm4rpnBsOJjURZMcoqFdTA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <50228C38.5080703@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <CAO2gOZUbkTsnJ2fwgeNhcRmxkzzJEifECeiF=_YRUjeKDeRMdA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <502294A1.3060800@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <50243480.7090803@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <CAO2gOZURCuWUk2MVwCwmwrijNzWxJt3q=HUpU7=Qv6zB9e-uqA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <50254A50.8070208@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <CAO2gOZXhHuFGJ0z=jvkYKZ84EoDaPSYVjxS7QzGore56SyhWyQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <50255B35.9020705@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <CAO2gOZWe+qMrVyvOoo7Ek-di0NKZxxU4Z=pqrDCqqCCAfctZOw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <50258712.4070002@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <CAO2gOZUQQjmKtooyXXAfgFoNVbeNwtT+P=E7pQ6jC=e07Nsr2g@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAO2gOZX-Gn+b6LEzps5zxhgmwQWcJ-zFqG=a7hesW6fbVyxZYQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <502E6774.8050609@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <CAO2gOZWhueDAShNLbNcJpkHA6QqXk1LNZhEMFvfT77aTZTCH9w@mail.gmail.com>
2012-08-30 14:28 ` Richard Henderson
2012-08-30 14:45 ` Bryce McKinlay
2012-08-30 15:20 ` Andrew Haley
2012-08-30 16:33 ` Richard Henderson
2012-09-04 16:07 ` Dehao Chen
2012-09-04 16:22 ` Andrew Haley
2012-09-04 20:40 ` Dehao Chen
2012-09-04 16:32 ` Bryce McKinlay
2012-09-04 16:40 ` Andrew Haley
2012-09-04 17:08 ` Bryce McKinlay
2012-09-04 17:12 ` Andrew Haley
2012-09-04 17:17 ` Bryce McKinlay
2012-09-04 17:21 ` Andrew Haley [this message]
2012-09-04 20:32 ` Dehao Chen
2012-09-05 7:29 ` Andrew Haley
2012-09-05 7:31 ` Andrew Pinski
2012-09-05 9:58 ` Mark Wielaard
2012-09-08 21:42 ` Dehao Chen
2012-09-14 15:14 ` Dehao Chen
2012-09-14 15:20 ` Andrew Haley
2012-09-15 4:25 ` H.J. Lu
2012-09-15 4:27 ` Andrew Pinski
2012-09-15 12:55 ` H.J. Lu
2012-09-15 16:09 ` Dehao Chen
2012-09-15 18:06 ` H.J. Lu
2012-09-15 22:03 ` Dehao Chen
2012-09-15 22:31 ` Mark Wielaard
2012-09-15 22:39 ` Mark Wielaard
2012-09-15 4:27 ` H.J. Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50463875.7000006@redhat.com \
--to=aph@redhat.com \
--cc=bmckinlay@gmail.com \
--cc=davidxl@google.com \
--cc=dehao@google.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=java@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=rth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).