From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com>,
Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>,
Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>,
gcc@gcc.gnu.org, java@gcc.gnu.org,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 15:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3lj5b7n7c.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CCF8804.6020203@redhat.com> (Jeff Law's message of "Mon, 01 Nov 2010 21:39:48 -0600")
>>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> writes:
Jeff> Building libjava (at least for me) is primarily painful due to 2 files
Jeff> (the names escape me) and the rather poor coarse level parallelism
Jeff> (can't build the 32bit and 64bit multilibs in parallel for example).
Jeff> Has anyone looked at fixing the build machinery for libjava to make it
Jeff> more sensible?
Nope. AFAIK it is already as parallelized as possible, but it has been
a while since I looked at it.
I thought the really bad file (HTML_401F.java, IIRC) had some functions
split up so that it wasn't so evil any more.
The multilib thing sounds like a top-level problem of some kind.
At least, I don't recall that libjava does anything special here.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-02 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-31 19:09 Ian Lance Taylor
2010-11-01 8:59 ` Andrew Haley
2010-11-02 10:14 ` Laurent GUERBY
2010-11-02 15:32 ` Tom Tromey
2010-11-01 10:31 ` Dave Korn
2010-11-01 17:36 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2010-11-01 18:16 ` Diego Novillo
2010-11-01 18:58 ` Andrew Haley
2010-11-01 19:35 ` H.J. Lu
2010-11-02 3:39 ` Jeff Law
2010-11-02 3:58 ` H.J. Lu
2010-11-02 8:22 ` Eric Botcazou
2010-11-02 15:31 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2010-11-02 16:25 ` Jeff Law
2010-11-02 5:12 ` Matthias Klose
2010-11-11 23:20 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2010-11-18 9:23 ` Mark Mitchell
2010-11-18 10:47 ` Andrew Haley
2010-11-18 13:42 ` H.J. Lu
2010-11-18 15:37 ` Mark Mitchell
2010-11-18 16:02 ` Diego Novillo
2010-11-18 15:23 ` Jeff Law
2010-11-18 17:19 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2010-11-18 17:58 ` Dave Korn
2010-11-18 20:53 ` Mark Wielaard
2010-10-31 19:33 Steven Bosscher
2010-10-31 19:47 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2010-11-01 3:48 ` Andrew Pinski
2010-11-01 10:11 ` Dave Korn
2010-11-01 4:06 ` Geert Bosch
2010-11-01 4:30 ` Joern Rennecke
2010-11-01 10:35 ` Geert Bosch
2010-11-01 10:46 ` Joern Rennecke
2010-11-02 10:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-11-02 16:43 ` David Daney
2010-11-01 17:46 ` Tom Tromey
2010-11-01 17:50 ` Andrew Haley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3lj5b7n7c.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=aph@redhat.com \
--cc=dnovillo@google.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=iant@google.com \
--cc=java-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=java@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=law@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).