public inbox for jit@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@majumdar.org.uk>
To: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
Cc: jit@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Filed PR jit/66812 for the code generation issue
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:00:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACXZuxcs0Zex=jsRubnNZ+HXPORULn8_j4vH4aw1tNnmJrErhQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436385256.24803.107.camel@surprise>

> BTW, are Lua/Ravi constants truly constant?  If so, then I'd believe
> you'd get a performance win by implementing LOADK by emitting code to
> write the specific tt and value_ directly, rather than code that copies
> a value from the table.

Yes - I do specialize to constants in certain cases - such as loops
and numeric operations. But more can be done.

>
> This would enable the optimizer to "know" the tt and value_, and
> optimize accordingly.  For example, in this case, I believe it would
> allow the function to be optimized away down to the equivalent of just a
> "return false;".  Obviously won't help much for a function without a
> loop, but if it saves instructions inside a loop, that's probably a win.
>
> (...though maybe not before we track down this issue)
>

Regards

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-08 20:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-01  0:00 A possible " Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00   ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00     ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00       ` Filed PR jit/66812 for the " David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00         ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00           ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00             ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00               ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                   ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                     ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                       ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                         ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                           ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00                             ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00                               ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                             ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00               ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                 ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00                   ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                     ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00                       ` Dibyendu Majumdar [this message]
2015-01-01  0:00                         ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                           ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00                             ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                               ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00                                 ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00                                   ` [PATCH] PR jit/66812: Candidate fix for for the code generation issue, v1 David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00                                     ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                                       ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00                                         ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                                           ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                                             ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00                                               ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                                                 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                                 ` Filed PR jit/66812 for the code generation issue Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00               ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00             ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00       ` A possible " David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00         ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00           ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00             ` Filed PR jit/66811: jit jumps aren't compilable as C (Re: A possible code generation issue) David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00               ` Filed PR jit/66811: jit dumps " David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00             ` A possible code generation issue Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00               ` PR jit/66783 (Re: A possible code generation issue) David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00                 ` [PATCH, committed] PR jit/66783: prevent use of opaque structs David Malcolm

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACXZuxcs0Zex=jsRubnNZ+HXPORULn8_j4vH4aw1tNnmJrErhQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=mobile@majumdar.org.uk \
    --cc=dmalcolm@redhat.com \
    --cc=jit@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).