public inbox for jit@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@majumdar.org.uk>
To: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
Cc: jit@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Filed PR jit/66812 for the code generation issue
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:00:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACXZuxe+vvvcBH50rzKKzY63cYOJOmbV8vUhv84=J1VOWwrv2Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACXZuxcXRryS_w_kA0y=V8sNzy6=JGMON-ciO6Ys21axwJFmMw@mail.gmail.com>

On 8 July 2015 at 21:22, Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@majumdar.org.uk> wrote:
> Here is what I think the flow is.
>
> part 1
> --------
>
> 1 [2] LOADNIL   0 0
>
> entry:
>   cl = (struct ravi_LClosure *)L->ci->func->value_.gc;
>   (void)raviV_op_loadnil (L->ci, (int)0, (int)0);
>
>
> This sets register 0 (local variable IX) to NIL
>
> 2 [3] LOADK     1 -1 ; 10
>
>   (&L->ci->u.l.base[(int)1])->value_.i = (&cl->p->k[(int)0])->value_.i;
>   (&L->ci->u.l.base[(int)1])->tt_ = (&cl->p->k[(int)0])->tt_;
>
> This sets the register at 1 (temporary) to 10.
>
> 3 [3] TEST     1 1
> 4 [3] JMP       0 0 ; to 5
>
> The above two bytecodes go together. This says that if register 1 is
> true then skip the JMP else JMP.
> So we get:
>
>   comparison_0_5 = (&L->ci->u.l.base[(int)1])->tt_ == (int)0;
>   comparison_0_6 = (&L->ci->u.l.base[(int)1])->tt_ == (int)1;
>   comparison_0_7 = (&L->ci->u.l.base[(int)1])->value_.b == (int)0;
>   isfalse_0_4 = comparison_0_5 || comparison_0_6 && comparison_0_7;
>   if (!(isfalse_0_4)) goto OP_TEST_do_jmp_2_8; else goto OP_TEST_do_skip_2_9;
>
> The test is checking that register 1 is true (which it is as it has
> the constant 10) - then goto skip_2_9.

Since we skipped the jump the next instruction is

5 [3] LOADBOOL 1 0 0

This is setting register 1 to false so we get:

OP_TEST_do_skip_2_9:
  goto jmp_5_1;

jmp_5_1:
  (&L->ci->u.l.base[(int)1])->value_.b = (int)0;
  (&L->ci->u.l.base[(int)1])->tt_ = (int)1;

Next instruction is:

6 [3] TEST     1 0
7 [3] JMP       0 1 ; to 9

Now this is saying that if register is _false_ then skip JMP else JMP.
Since we know that register 1 is false as above then the code should
skip the jump.

  comparison_0_11 = (&L->ci->u.l.base[(int)1])->tt_ == (int)0;
  comparison_0_12 = (&L->ci->u.l.base[(int)1])->tt_ == (int)1;
  comparison_0_13 = (&L->ci->u.l.base[(int)1])->value_.b == (int)0;
  isfalse_0_10 = comparison_0_11 || comparison_0_12 && comparison_0_13;
  if (!(!(isfalse_0_10))) goto OP_TEST_do_jmp_5_14; else goto
OP_TEST_do_skip_5_15;

So we go to skip_5_15:

8 [3] LOADBOOL 0 1 0

OP_TEST_do_skip_5_15:
  (&L->ci->u.l.base[(int)0])->value_.b = (int)1;
  (&L->ci->u.l.base[(int)0])->tt_ = (int)1;
  goto jmp_9_2;

So you see that the local IX is set to false above which is what we
want. Next we jump to 9_2 which is the start of the return statement.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-08 20:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-01  0:00 A possible " Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00   ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00     ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00       ` Filed PR jit/66812 for the " David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00         ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00           ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00             ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00             ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00               ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                   ` Dibyendu Majumdar [this message]
2015-01-01  0:00                     ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                       ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                         ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                           ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00                             ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00                               ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                             ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00               ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                 ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00                   ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                     ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00                       ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                         ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                           ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00                             ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                               ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00                                 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                                 ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00                                   ` [PATCH] PR jit/66812: Candidate fix for for the code generation issue, v1 David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00                                     ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                                       ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00                                         ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                                           ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                                             ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00                                               ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00                                                 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00               ` Filed PR jit/66812 for the code generation issue David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00       ` A possible " David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00         ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00           ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00             ` Filed PR jit/66811: jit jumps aren't compilable as C (Re: A possible code generation issue) David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00               ` Filed PR jit/66811: jit dumps " David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00             ` A possible code generation issue Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01  0:00               ` PR jit/66783 (Re: A possible code generation issue) David Malcolm
2015-01-01  0:00                 ` [PATCH, committed] PR jit/66783: prevent use of opaque structs David Malcolm

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACXZuxe+vvvcBH50rzKKzY63cYOJOmbV8vUhv84=J1VOWwrv2Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=mobile@majumdar.org.uk \
    --cc=dmalcolm@redhat.com \
    --cc=jit@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).