From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@majumdar.org.uk>
To: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
Cc: jit@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR jit/66812: Candidate fix for for the code generation issue, v1
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:00:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACXZuxdWi-ZfHwK4Pa-mdbuBiX9zpzpvVbPeFVH9qqF5+8eFGg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436489129.24803.174.camel@surprise>
On 10 July 2015 at 01:45, David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com> wrote:
>> however performance degraded similar to when
>> -fno-strict-aliasing is used.
>
> Bother. What kind of numbers are we talking about?
>
I will post some numbers tonight.
I am beginning to think that using unions was not a good idea - I
should do it the way I implement the LLVM version - i.e. use a struct
and emulate the union functionality. I think unions are just hard for
the optimizer to reason about.
Unfortunately this means a bit of rework - so I won't know if the
struct approach is better until after I have done the changes and
compared results.
Regards
Dibyendu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-10 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-01 0:00 A possible code generation issue Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01 0:00 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01 0:00 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01 0:00 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01 0:00 ` Filed PR jit/66812 for the " David Malcolm
2015-01-01 0:00 ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01 0:00 ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01 0:00 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01 0:00 ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01 0:00 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01 0:00 ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01 0:00 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01 0:00 ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01 0:00 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01 0:00 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01 0:00 ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01 0:00 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01 0:00 ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01 0:00 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01 0:00 ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01 0:00 ` [PATCH] PR jit/66812: Candidate fix for for the code generation issue, v1 David Malcolm
2015-01-01 0:00 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01 0:00 ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01 0:00 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01 0:00 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01 0:00 ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01 0:00 ` Dibyendu Majumdar [this message]
2015-01-01 0:00 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01 0:00 ` Filed PR jit/66812 for the code generation issue Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01 0:00 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01 0:00 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01 0:00 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01 0:00 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01 0:00 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01 0:00 ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01 0:00 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01 0:00 ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01 0:00 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01 0:00 ` David Malcolm
2015-01-01 0:00 ` A possible " David Malcolm
2015-01-01 0:00 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01 0:00 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01 0:00 ` Filed PR jit/66811: jit jumps aren't compilable as C (Re: A possible code generation issue) David Malcolm
2015-01-01 0:00 ` Filed PR jit/66811: jit dumps " David Malcolm
2015-01-01 0:00 ` A possible code generation issue Dibyendu Majumdar
2015-01-01 0:00 ` PR jit/66783 (Re: A possible code generation issue) David Malcolm
2015-01-01 0:00 ` [PATCH, committed] PR jit/66783: prevent use of opaque structs David Malcolm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACXZuxdWi-ZfHwK4Pa-mdbuBiX9zpzpvVbPeFVH9qqF5+8eFGg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mobile@majumdar.org.uk \
--cc=dmalcolm@redhat.com \
--cc=jit@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).