public inbox for libabigail@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
To: John Moon <quic_johmoo@quicinc.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>,
	Matthias Maennich <maennich@google.com>,
	Giuliano Procida <gprocida@google.com>,
	 kernel-team@android.com, libabigail@sourceware.org,
	Jordan Crouse <jorcrous@amazon.com>,
	Trilok Soni <quic_tsoni@quicinc.com>,
	Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala <quic_satyap@quicinc.com>,
	Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@quicinc.com>,
	Guru Das Srinagesh <quic_gurus@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] check-uapi: Introduce check-uapi.sh
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 16:37:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <718c102205750a00b86e8d33748e9bfb3c485ee1.camel@klomp.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d34a6b09-8244-49e2-2d7a-eee5fd5ca5b7@quicinc.com>

Hi,

On Wed, 2023-04-12 at 09:37 -0700, John Moon via Libabigail wrote:
> On 4/11/2023 11:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > Would you find the tool more useful if it simply filtered out all instances
> > > where the size of the type did not change? This would filter out the
> > > following which the tool currently flags:
> > > 
> > > - enum expansions
> > > - reserved field expansions
> > > - expansions of a struct with a flex array at the end
> > > - type changes
> > > - re-ordering of existing members
> > > - ...others?
> > 
> > Obviously not, as some of those are real breakages, and some are not at
> > all.
> > 
> > Please understand what is an abi breakage.  Adding new enums is not.
> > Using a reserved field is not.  Reording existing members IS.
> > 
> 
> Yes, understood that method would miss certain classes of breakages. I 
> was suggesting it as a way to improve the signal-to-noise ratio of the 
> tool since we don't currently have an algorithm for determining 
> breakages with 100% accuracy.

Note that you can check the exit code of libabigail's abidiff to see
whether something is an incompatible abi change or not, see:
https://sourceware.org/libabigail/manual/abidiff.html#return-values

You can also of course use suppressions to instruct abidiff to avoid
reporting changes involving certain ABI artifacts:
https://sourceware.org/libabigail/manual/libabigail-concepts.html#suppr-spec-label

Cheers,

Mark

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-13 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-07 20:34 [PATCH v5 0/2] Validating UAPI backwards compatibility John Moon
2023-04-07 20:34 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] check-uapi: Introduce check-uapi.sh John Moon
2023-04-10 10:03   ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-04-10 18:45     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-04-10 23:32       ` John Moon
2023-04-11  6:34         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-04-11 18:36           ` John Moon
2023-04-12  6:14             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-04-12 16:37               ` John Moon
2023-04-12 16:43                 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-04-13 17:07                   ` John Moon
2023-04-13 18:22                     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-04-13 14:37                 ` Mark Wielaard [this message]
2023-04-13 17:12                   ` Giuliano Procida
2023-04-13 17:15                   ` John Moon
2023-04-13 17:03     ` Nicolas Schier
2023-04-13 17:33       ` John Moon
2023-07-20 16:10   ` [PATCH] scripts/check-uapi.sh: add stgdiff support Giuliano Procida
2023-07-22 19:40     ` Trilok Soni
2023-04-07 20:34 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] docs: dev-tools: Add UAPI checker documentation John Moon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=718c102205750a00b86e8d33748e9bfb3c485ee1.camel@klomp.org \
    --to=mark@klomp.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=gprocida@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jorcrous@amazon.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=libabigail@sourceware.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maennich@google.com \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=nicolas@fjasle.eu \
    --cc=quic_eberman@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_gurus@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_johmoo@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_satyap@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_tsoni@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=tkjos@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).