public inbox for libabigail@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dodji at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: libabigail@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug default/26646] unexpected declaration-only types
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 15:54:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-26646-9487-CyJy348O0H@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-26646-9487@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26646

--- Comment #25 from dodji at redhat dot com ---
(In reply to gprocida from comment #24)
> Hi.
> 
> I ran some quick tests - the libabigail test suite and on the two kernels.

Thanks!

> Good
> 
> * vmlinux3 and vmlinux4 get ABIs which are the same, including
> declaration-only / fully-defined status
> * both have more fully-defined types than the previous iteration (around 9)
> * a Linux test case looks better (some declaration-only duplicates vanish)

Good to know.

> 
> Not so good
> 
> * struct can_dev_rcv_lists is now declaration-only (w.r.t. to the original
> baseline ABIs)
> * struct prefix_info too (w.r.t. an intermediate code version)

OK, I haven't analyzed this, is it sure that it was supposed to be fully
declared?

> * there is a test case regression (nmap)

OK, I think I have the reason for this. It seems to have been an unfortunate
patch that snuck into the tree.  I have removed it and re-push the branch.  You
can fetch it again and test.  This one should disappear.

If the regression disappears, I guess we can say that the current state is an
improvement.  If so, I'll clean-up and post the patches on the list, if you
agree.  Further investigation will continue after that.

Thanks.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-24 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-22 11:35 [Bug default/26646] New: unexpectedly " gprocida+abigail at google dot com
2020-09-22 12:15 ` [Bug default/26646] " dodji at redhat dot com
2020-10-06 21:02 ` gprocida+abigail at google dot com
2020-10-07  9:33 ` gprocida+abigail at google dot com
2020-11-23 17:06 ` gprocida+abigail at google dot com
2022-01-17 17:46 ` gprocida at google dot com
2022-01-18  9:37 ` gprocida at google dot com
2022-01-18 11:20 ` gprocida at google dot com
2022-01-18 11:20 ` gprocida at google dot com
2022-01-18 11:32 ` gprocida at google dot com
2022-01-24 15:07 ` dodji at redhat dot com
2022-01-24 17:29 ` gprocida at google dot com
2022-02-07 10:40 ` gprocida at google dot com
2022-02-07 11:19 ` dodji at redhat dot com
2022-02-07 17:10 ` [Bug default/26646] unexpected " dodji at redhat dot com
2022-02-07 17:47 ` gprocida at google dot com
2022-02-07 21:15 ` gprocida at google dot com
2022-02-10 16:45 ` dodji at redhat dot com
2022-02-10 16:46 ` gprocida at google dot com
2022-02-10 17:21 ` gprocida at google dot com
2022-02-10 17:33 ` dodji at redhat dot com
2022-02-10 17:36 ` dodji at redhat dot com
2022-02-10 18:53 ` gprocida at google dot com
2022-02-11 12:51 ` gprocida at google dot com
2022-02-11 13:00 ` gprocida at google dot com
2022-02-24 11:09 ` dodji at redhat dot com
2022-02-24 12:16 ` gprocida at google dot com
2022-02-24 15:54 ` dodji at redhat dot com [this message]
2022-02-24 16:05 ` gprocida at google dot com
2022-02-28  9:59 ` dodji at redhat dot com
2022-02-28 10:01 ` dodji at redhat dot com
2022-03-01 14:34 ` gprocida at google dot com
2022-03-01 14:40 ` gprocida at google dot com
2022-03-02 13:34   ` Dodji Seketeli
2022-03-02 13:34 ` dodji at seketeli dot org
2022-03-02 22:36 ` gprocida at google dot com
2022-03-03 11:43 ` dodji at seketeli dot org
2022-03-03 13:32 ` gprocida at google dot com
2022-06-08 15:43 ` gprocida at google dot com
     [not found] <bug-26646-12616@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
     [not found] ` <bug-26646-12616-6R4shWHsRy@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2022-03-02 22:35   ` Giuliano Procida
2022-03-03 11:43     ` Dodji Seketeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-26646-9487-CyJy348O0H@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=libabigail@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).