* [Bug default/27599] New: abidiff's notion of harmless union diff may need refinement
@ 2021-03-17 22:46 gprocida+abigail at google dot com
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gprocida+abigail at google dot com @ 2021-03-17 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libabigail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27599
Bug ID: 27599
Summary: abidiff's notion of harmless union diff may need
refinement
Product: libabigail
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: default
Assignee: dodji at redhat dot com
Reporter: gprocida+abigail at google dot com
CC: libabigail at sourceware dot org
Target Milestone: ---
The fix to PR24731 introduced the notion of harmless union diffs.
Occasionally we check what is being reported as filtered out by abidiff and
peek in more detail with abidiff --harmless. Alas, for kernel code, this
usually generates massive diffs and it's quite hard to spot the real causes.
This bug report is about a frequent red herring in such diffs.
The file tests/data/test-diff-dwarf/PR25058-liblttng-ctl-report-1.txt
illustrates the issue on a smaller scale.
There are two diff stanzas of interest.
type of 'union {char* string; uint64_t constant; double float_constant; char*
identifier; filter_node* child;} u' changed
and
underlying type 'union YYSTYPE' changed
Both have members of type filter_node* (which has changed... somewhere).
Emitting the "harmless union diff" text here is unhelpful as union definition
is unchanged. The current test for a harmless union change is effectively
(sizes are equal and) has_changes() which amounts to an equality comparison of
the two union types.
abidiff --leaf-changes-only doesn't report these changes at all.
[As an aside and to give an idea of what I mean by "massive". I compared two
ABIs I expected to be equal.
abidiff --leaf-changes-only: 0 changes, no diff
abidiff --leaf-changes-only --harmless: 0 changes, 0 no diff
abidiff: 1861 filtered out function and variable changes, no diff
abidiff --harmless: 23848 lines of output
A second trigger appears to be some definition/declaration issues in the XML
which don't get picked up in leaf mode here either.]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-03-17 22:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-03-17 22:46 [Bug default/27599] New: abidiff's notion of harmless union diff may need refinement gprocida+abigail at google dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).