public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, John Mellor-Crummey <johnmc@rice.edu>,
	Ben Woodard <woodard@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 18/20] elf: Issue la_symbind() for bind-now (BZ #23734)
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 17:43:28 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16d66938-9a41-1982-58f8-72c0259cc891@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a6gvf5kg.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>



On 20/12/2021 16:18, Florian Weimer wrote:
> I believe this change needs to update elf/sotruss-lib.c:
> 
> uintptr_t
> la_symbind (Elf_Sym *sym, unsigned int ndx, uintptr_t *refcook,
> 	    uintptr_t *defcook, unsigned int *flags, const char *symname)
> {
>   if (!do_exit)
>     *flags = LA_SYMB_NOPLTEXIT;
> 
>   return sym->st_value;
> }



> 
> * Adhemerval Zanella:
> 
>> diff --git a/elf/Makefile b/elf/Makefile
>> index ee4daae0fc..acce163078 100644
>> --- a/elf/Makefile
>> +++ b/elf/Makefile
> 
>> +# The test check if a library without .gnu.version correctly calls the
>> +# audit callbacks.  So it uses an explicit link rule to avoid linking
>> +# against libc.so.
>> +$(objpfx)tst-audit24bmod1.so: $(objpfx)tst-audit24bmod1.os
>> +	$(CC) -nostdlib -nostartfiles -shared -o $@.new $(objpfx)tst-audit24bmod1.os \
>> +	  -Wl,-z,now
>> +	$(call after-link,$@.new)
>> +	mv -f $@.new $@
> 
> I think you may have to update modules-names-nobuild as well.

Ack.

> 
>>  # tst-sonamemove links against an older implementation of the library.
>>  LDFLAGS-tst-sonamemove-linkmod1.so = \
>>    -Wl,--version-script=tst-sonamemove-linkmod1.map \
>> diff --git a/elf/dl-audit.c b/elf/dl-audit.c
>> index c3569cb357..f080591596 100644
>> --- a/elf/dl-audit.c
>> +++ b/elf/dl-audit.c
>> @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ rtld_hidden_def (_dl_audit_symbind_alt)
>>  void
>>  _dl_audit_symbind (struct link_map *l, struct reloc_result *reloc_result,
>>  		   const ElfW(Sym) *defsym, DL_FIXUP_VALUE_TYPE *value,
>> -		   lookup_t result)
>> +		   lookup_t result, bool bindnow)
>>  {
> 
> Should “bindow“ be called “for_jmp_slot”?

Ok, it does make sense if the idea would be extend not only for functions
calls.

> 
>> @@ -229,16 +230,16 @@ _dl_audit_symbind (struct link_map *l, struct reloc_result *reloc_result,
>>  	{
>>  	  if (afct->symbind != NULL)
>>  	    {
>> -	      uintptr_t new_value = afct->symbind (&sym,
>> -						   reloc_result->boundndx,
>> -						   &l_state->cookie,
>> -						   &result_state->cookie,
>> -						   &flags,
>> -						   strtab2 + defsym->st_name);
>> +	      flags |= bindnow ? LA_SYMB_NOPLTENTER | LA_SYMB_NOPLTEXIT : 0;
>> +	      new_value = afct->symbind (&sym, reloc_result->boundndx,
>> +					 &l_state->cookie,
>> +					 &result_state->cookie, &flags,
>> +					 strtab2 + defsym->st_name);
>>  	      if (new_value != (uintptr_t) sym.st_value)
>>  		{
>>  		  flags |= LA_SYMB_ALTVALUE;
>> -		  sym.st_value = new_value;
>> +		  sym.st_value = bindnow
>> +		    ? DL_FIXUP_BINDNOW_ADDR_VALUE (new_value) : new_value;
>>  		}
>>  	    }
> 
> We could error out if the audit callback clears the LA_SYMB_NOPLT* flags
> we've set (after fixing sotruss).

I don't oppose bumping LAV_CURRENT, it is large change than I envisioned
in this change but it makes sense.  

> 
> And then we'll have to make this change conditional on the la_version
> return value, I think.

My understanding from previous discussion is we don't want to support mixed
lav versions, so bumping the minimal version should be suffice.  It would
required older modules to be rebuild against a newer glibc, but I think
it should be ok.

> 
>> --- a/elf/dl-reloc.c
>> +++ b/elf/dl-reloc.c
>> @@ -234,9 +234,7 @@ _dl_relocate_object (struct link_map *l, struct r_scope_elem *scope[],
>>  
>>    /* If DT_BIND_NOW is set relocate all references in this object.  We
>>       do not do this if we are profiling, of course.  */
>> -  // XXX Correct for auditing?
>> -  if (!consider_profiling
>> -      && __builtin_expect (l->l_info[DT_BIND_NOW] != NULL, 0))
>> +  if (!consider_profiling && l->l_info[DT_BIND_NOW] != NULL)
>>      lazy = 0;
>>  
>>    if (__glibc_unlikely (GLRO(dl_debug_mask) & DL_DEBUG_RELOC))
>> @@ -285,8 +283,6 @@ _dl_relocate_object (struct link_map *l, struct r_scope_elem *scope[],
>>    {
>>      /* Do the actual relocation of the object's GOT and other data.  */
>>  
>> -    ELF_DYNAMIC_RELOCATE (l, scope, lazy, consider_profiling, skip_ifunc);
>> -
>>  #ifndef PROF
>>      if (consider_profiling | consider_symbind
>>  	&& l->l_info[DT_PLTRELSZ] != NULL)
>> @@ -309,6 +305,8 @@ _dl_relocate_object (struct link_map *l, struct r_scope_elem *scope[],
>>  	  }
>>        }
>>  #endif
>> +
>> +    ELF_DYNAMIC_RELOCATE (l, scope, lazy, consider_profiling, skip_ifunc);
>>    }
> 
> I don't understand why this is needed.  Can we indeed use the profiling
> trampoline with a BIND_NOW binding?  If not, then we shouldn't need the
> allocation of l_reloc_result, either.  We should patch in the changed
> symbol variable directly, not going through l_reloc_result.

I does not indeed, I just did it to avoid adjusting _dl_audit_symbind. But
I agree that not requiring allocate l_reloc_results for bind-now is a better
strategy. I will fix it.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-20 20:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-15 18:37 [PATCH v6 00/20] Multiple rtld-audit fixes Adhemerval Zanella
2021-11-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 01/20] elf: Suppress audit calls when a (new) namespace is empty (BZ #28062) Adhemerval Zanella
2021-11-15 19:01   ` Florian Weimer
2021-11-16 13:14     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-11-16 13:15       ` Florian Weimer
2021-11-16 13:45       ` Andreas Schwab
2021-11-16 13:48         ` Florian Weimer
2021-11-16 14:16           ` Andreas Schwab
2021-11-18 19:58             ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-11-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 02/20] elf: Add _dl_audit_objopen Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-10 12:40   ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-10 12:48     ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-10 13:45       ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-10 14:11         ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-10 14:15           ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-10 14:41             ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-11-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 03/20] elf: Add _dl_audit_activity_map and _dl_audit_activity_nsid Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-10 13:54   ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-10 14:58     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-11-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 04/20] elf: Add _dl_audit_objsearch Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-17 12:21   ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-17 16:09     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-17 16:12       ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-17 16:33         ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-11-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 05/20] elf: Add _dl_audit_objclose Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-17 16:29   ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-17 16:39     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-11-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 06/20] elf: Add _dl_audit_symbind_alt and _dl_audit_symbind Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-17 16:50   ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-17 18:46     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-11-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 07/20] elf: Add _dl_audit_preinit Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-17 17:13   ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-17 18:54     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-11-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 08/20] elf: Add _dl_audit_pltenter Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-17 17:21   ` Florian Weimer
2021-11-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 09/20] elf: Add _dl_audit_pltexit Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-17 17:43   ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-17 19:02     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-11-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 10/20] elf: Avoid unnecessary slowdown from profiling with audit (BZ#15533) Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-18 18:45   ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-20 12:10     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-11-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 11/20] elf: Add audit tests for modules with TLSDESC Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-18 18:53   ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-20 12:23     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-11-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 12/20] elf: Do not fail for failed dlmopen on audit modules (BZ #28061) Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-18 18:59   ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-20 12:24     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-11-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 13/20] elf: Fix initial-exec TLS access on audit modules (BZ #28096) Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-18 18:01   ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-20 13:25     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-11-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 14/20] elf: Issue audit la_objopen() for vDSO Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-18 20:00   ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-20 12:50     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-20 13:18       ` Florian Weimer
2021-11-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 15/20] elf: Run constructors if executable has a soname of a dependency Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-18 20:08   ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-20 16:49     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-20 16:52       ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-20 16:55         ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-11-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 16/20] elf: Add main application on main_map l_name Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-20 13:32   ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-20 18:04     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-11-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 17/20] elf: Add la_activity during application exit Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-20 13:34   ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-20 19:46     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-11-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 18/20] elf: Issue la_symbind() for bind-now (BZ #23734) Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-20 19:18   ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-20 20:43     ` Adhemerval Zanella [this message]
2021-12-20 21:04       ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-20 21:09         ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-11-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 19/20] elf: Fix runtime linker auditing on aarch64 (BZ #26643) Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-20 21:32   ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-21 14:33     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-21 14:44       ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-21 14:48         ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-21 14:54           ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-21 17:03             ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-21 17:22               ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-21 17:38                 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-21 18:11                   ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-21 18:19                     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-20 21:34   ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-21 17:47   ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-12-21 17:49     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-11-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 20/20] elf: Add SVE support for aarch64 rtld-audit Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-21 14:27   ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-21 14:37     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-12-21 16:45     ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-12-21 17:08       ` Adhemerval Zanella

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16d66938-9a41-1982-58f8-72c0259cc891@linaro.org \
    --to=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=johnmc@rice.edu \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=woodard@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).