From: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
To: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>
Cc: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>,
Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>,
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>,
libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dl: Use "adr" assembler command to get proper load address on ARM
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 15:59:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211015155919.20392561@ktm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211015120915.GD1982710@arm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7521 bytes --]
Hi Szabolcs,
> The 10/15/2021 09:54, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > This change is a partial revert of commit
> > bca0f5cbc9257c13322b99e55235c4f21ba0bd82
> > "arm: Simplify elf_machine_{load_address,dynamic}" which imposed
> > usage of __ehdr_start linker variable to get the address of loaded
> > program.
> >
> > The elf_machine_load_address() function is declared in the
> > sysdeps/arm/dl-machine.h header. It is called from (very early)
> > _dl_start() entry point for the program. It shall return the load
> > address of the dynamic linker program.
> >
> > With this revert the 'adr' assembler instruction is used instead of
> > a place holder:
> >
> > arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-objdump -t ld-linux-armhf.so.3 | grep ehdr
> > 00000000 l .note.gnu.build-id 00000000 __ehdr_start
> >
> > which is pre-set by binutils.
> >
> > The problem starts when one runs 'prelink' on the rootfs created
> > with for example OE/Yocto.
> > Then the _ehdr_start stays as 0x0, but the ELF header's sections
> > have different addresses - for example 0x41000000 instead of the
> > originally set 0x0.
> >
> > This is crucial when /sbin/init is executed. Value set in
> > __ehdr_start symbol is not updated. This causes the program to
> > crash very early when ld-linux-armhf.so.3's _dl_start is executed,
> > as calculated offset for loader relocation is going to hit the
> > kernel space (0xf7xxyyyy).
> >
> > It looks like the correct way to obtain the _dl_start offset on ARM
> > is to use assembler instruction 'adr' at execution time (so the
> > prelink assigned offset is taken into consideration) instead of
> > __ehdr_start.
> >
> > With this patch we only modify the elf_machine_load_address()
> > function, as it is called very early, before the
> > ld-linux-armhf.so.3 is performing relocation (also its own one).
>
> i'd use an explanation like:
>
> __ehdr_start is a linker created symbol that points to the elf header.
> The elf header is at the beginning of the elf file and normally its
> virtual address is 0 in a shared library. This means the runtime
> address of __ehdr_start is the load address of the module. However if
> prelinking is applied to ld.so then all virtual addresses are moved by
> an offset so the runtime address of the elf header becomes the load
> address + prelink offset. The kernel does not treat prelinked ld.so
> specially so the load address is not 0, it still has to be computed,
> but simply using __ehdr_start no longer gives a correct value for
> that.
>
> This issue affects all targets with prelinking support, but so far we
> only got reports from OE/Yocto builds for arm that has prelinked
> ld.so.
>
Thanks for a very detailed description.
> but i think a better fix is possible than revert:
>
> ElfW(Addr)
> elf_machine_load_address ()
> {
> extern ElfW(Dyn) _DYNAMIC[] attribute_hidden;
> extern ElfW(Dyn) extern_DYNAMIC[] asm ("_DYNAMIC");
>
So the _DYNAMIC = GOT[0] (and it points into the .dynamic section)
objdump -d -j .got ld-linux-armhf.so.3
Disassembly of section .got:
41036fbc <.got+0x41000000>:
41036fbc: 41036ef4 .word 0x41036ef4
So it indeed points into the
[16] .dynamic DYNAMIC 41036ef4
> /* Uses pc-relative address computation. */
> ElfW(Addr) runtime_addr = (ElfW(Addr)) &_DYNAMIC;
I guess that the &_DYNAMIC gives the address around which $pc runs
(e.g. 0xb6fc9504) - this is the actual address of run program.
(A side question - is there any way to read the _DYNAMIC symbol value
directly - via e.g. readelf or objdump?)
>
> /* Loads an unrelocated GOT entry. */
> ElfW(Addr) linktime_addr = (ElfW(Addr)) &extern_DYNAMIC;
>
This is the prelink'ed address -> 0x41036ef4 in our case?
> return runtime_addr - linktime_addr;
And the address to which we shall relocated would be:
0xb6fc9504 - 0x41036ef4 = 0x75f92610 - which is the address to which
the ld.so (ld-linux-armhf.so.3) will re-relocate itself?
> }
>
> I expect this to work on most targets and very similar to the code
> that was originally used on other targets: only a new GOT entry is
> introduced instead of using GOT[0].
In fact we only rely on _DYNAMIC symbol -> which points into .dynamic
section.
> (that new got entry will have a
> relative relocation which means there must be a dynamic section even
> in a static PIE, so i expect _DYNAMIC to be defined.
Ok.
> this also means
> that it's slightly more expensive than &__ehdr_start, so it is for
> targets that want to support prelinked ld.so)
>
> The original arm code used _dl_start symbol, likely because that's
> within range for the adr instruction for more efficient pc-relative
> computation. But that's a function symbol that requires fixups due
> to thumb interworking issues and is not available in static PIE, so
> using _DYNAMIC sounds better even on arm.
+1.
>
> >
> > HW:
> > Hardware name:
> > - ARM-Versatile Express (Run with QEMU)
> > - Beagle Bone Black
> >
> > Build Environment: OE/Yocto -> poky
> > SHA1: 1e2e9a84d6dd81d7f6dd69c0d119d0149d10ade1
> >
> > Fixes: BZ #28293
> > ---
> > sysdeps/arm/dl-machine.h | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/sysdeps/arm/dl-machine.h b/sysdeps/arm/dl-machine.h
> > index dfa05eee44..d6e5f1d5ec 100644
> > --- a/sysdeps/arm/dl-machine.h
> > +++ b/sysdeps/arm/dl-machine.h
> > @@ -39,11 +39,33 @@ elf_machine_matches_host (const Elf32_Ehdr
> > *ehdr) }
> >
> > /* Return the run-time load address of the shared object. */
> > -static inline ElfW(Addr) __attribute__ ((unused))
> > +static inline Elf32_Addr __attribute__ ((unused))
> > elf_machine_load_address (void)
> > {
> > - extern const ElfW(Ehdr) __ehdr_start attribute_hidden;
> > - return (ElfW(Addr)) &__ehdr_start;
> > + Elf32_Addr pcrel_addr;
> > +#ifdef SHARED
> > + extern Elf32_Addr __dl_start (void *) asm ("_dl_start");
> > + Elf32_Addr got_addr = (Elf32_Addr) &__dl_start;
> > + asm ("adr %0, _dl_start" : "=r" (pcrel_addr));
> > +#else
> > + extern Elf32_Addr __dl_relocate_static_pie (void *)
> > + asm ("_dl_relocate_static_pie") attribute_hidden;
> > + Elf32_Addr got_addr = (Elf32_Addr) &__dl_relocate_static_pie;
> > + asm ("adr %0, _dl_relocate_static_pie" : "=r" (pcrel_addr));
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef __thumb__
> > + /* Clear the low bit of the function address.
> > +
> > + NOTE: got_addr is from GOT table whose lsb is always set by
> > linker if it's
> > + Thumb function address. PCREL_ADDR comes from PC-relative
> > calculation
> > + which will finish during assembling. GAS assembler before
> > the fix for
> > + PR gas/21458 was not setting the lsb but does after that.
> > Always do the
> > + strip for both, so the code works with various combinations
> > of glibc and
> > + Binutils. */
> > + got_addr &= ~(Elf32_Addr) 1;
> > + pcrel_addr &= ~(Elf32_Addr) 1;
> > +#endif
> > + return pcrel_addr - got_addr;
> > }
> >
> > /* Return the link-time address of _DYNAMIC. */
> > --
> > 2.20.1
> >
Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma@denx.de
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-15 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-07 13:16 [PATCH] dl: Use "adr" assembler command to get proper load address Lukasz Majewski
2021-09-07 16:49 ` Fangrui Song
2021-09-07 17:32 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-09-07 17:44 ` Fangrui Song
2021-09-08 15:05 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-09-08 17:41 ` Fāng-ruì Sòng
2021-09-08 19:19 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-09-08 20:34 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-09-09 7:18 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-09-09 9:49 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-09-10 10:10 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-09-17 8:29 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-09-17 13:27 ` Joseph Myers
2021-09-17 16:17 ` Andreas Schwab
2021-09-26 19:58 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-09-27 16:00 ` Joseph Myers
2021-10-05 7:45 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-06 7:57 ` Fangrui Song
2021-10-06 9:03 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-06 11:43 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-06 12:55 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-07 9:19 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-07 10:00 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-07 14:15 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-07 14:58 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-07 14:16 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-10-07 14:29 ` H.J. Lu
2021-10-07 15:57 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-07 16:22 ` H.J. Lu
2021-10-07 16:53 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-10-07 17:05 ` H.J. Lu
2021-10-07 17:24 ` Fāng-ruì Sòng
2021-10-08 9:15 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-11 8:56 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-11 10:18 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-11 11:47 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-11 12:01 ` H.J. Lu
2021-10-11 13:10 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-11 13:22 ` H.J. Lu
2021-10-11 14:31 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-11 13:34 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-10-11 12:48 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-15 7:54 ` [PATCH v2] dl: Use "adr" assembler command to get proper load address on ARM Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-15 12:09 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-15 12:21 ` H.J. Lu
2021-10-15 12:59 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-15 23:53 ` Fāng-ruì Sòng
2021-10-18 11:08 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-18 11:35 ` Florian Weimer
2021-10-19 12:03 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-25 10:18 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-25 10:25 ` Florian Weimer
2021-10-25 10:53 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-25 13:34 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-25 14:04 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-25 15:09 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-25 17:26 ` Joseph Myers
2021-10-26 13:52 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-26 20:55 ` Joseph Myers
2021-10-27 9:38 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-25 18:25 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-15 13:59 ` Lukasz Majewski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211015155919.20392561@ktm \
--to=lukma@denx.de \
--cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
--cc=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=maskray@google.com \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).