public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@gmail.com>
To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Cc: "Alejandro Colomar" <alx@kernel.org>,
	"Theo de Raadt" <deraadt@theos.com>,
	"Todd C . Miller" <Todd.Miller@sudo.ws>,
	"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	"Cristian Rodríguez" <crrodriguez@opensuse.org>,
	"Adhemerval Zanella" <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>,
	"Yann Droneaud" <ydroneaud@opteya.com>,
	"Joseph Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Give a useful meaning to arc4random_uniform(0);
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2022 03:36:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221231023653.41877-1-alx@kernel.org> (raw)

Special-casing it in the implementation to return 0 was useless.
Instead, considering 0 as the value after UINT32_MAX has the property
that it allows implementing the following function without any
special cases:

uint32_t
arc4random_range(uint32_t min, uint32_t max)
{
	return arc4random_uniform(max - min + 1) + min;
}

This works for any values of min and max (as long as min <= max, of
course), even for (0, UINT32_MAX).

Oh, and the implementation of arc4random_uniform(3) is now 2 lines
simpler. :)

This will work with the current implementation because powerof2(3) will
also consider 0 as a power of 2.  See powerof2(3):

 SYNOPSIS
       #include <sys/param.h>

       int powerof2(x);

 DESCRIPTION
       This  macro  returns true if x is a power of 2, and false
       otherwise.

       0 is considered a power of 2.  This can make  sense  con‐
       sidering wrapping of unsigned integers, and has interest‐
       ing properties.

Cc: Theo de Raadt <deraadt@theos.com>
Cc: Todd C. Miller <Todd.Miller@sudo.ws>
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: Cristian Rodríguez <crrodriguez@opensuse.org>
Cc: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
Cc: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@opteya.com>
Cc: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
---

Hi,

I CCd Theo and Todd, because theirs is the original implementation, and
while this is a useful feature (IMO), it wouldn't make sense to do it
without consensus with other implementations, and especially with the
original implementation.

I found this useful for shadow, where the existing code had a function
that produced a "random" value within a range, but due to the bogus
implementation, it had bias for higher values.  Implementing a *_range()
variant in terms of *_uniform() made it really simple, but the
*_uniform() function needed to do something useful for 0 for that to
work.

Cheers,

Alex

 stdlib/arc4random_uniform.c | 10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/stdlib/arc4random_uniform.c b/stdlib/arc4random_uniform.c
index 5aa98d1c13..1cd52c0d1c 100644
--- a/stdlib/arc4random_uniform.c
+++ b/stdlib/arc4random_uniform.c
@@ -29,15 +29,13 @@
    the asked range after range adjustment.
 
    The algorithm avoids modulo and divide operations, which might be costly
-   depending on the architecture.  */
+   depending on the architecture.
+
+   0 is treated as if it were UINT32_MAX + 1, and so arc4random_uniform(0)
+   is equivalent to arc4random().  */
 uint32_t
 __arc4random_uniform (uint32_t n)
 {
-  if (n <= 1)
-    /* There is no valid return value for a zero limit, and 0 is the
-       only possible result for limit 1.  */
-    return 0;
-
   /* Powers of two are easy.  */
   if (powerof2 (n))
     return __arc4random () & (n - 1);
-- 
2.39.0


             reply	other threads:[~2022-12-31  2:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-31  2:36 Alejandro Colomar [this message]
2022-12-31  2:48 ` Alejandro Colomar
2022-12-31  2:57 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-12-31 13:39   ` Alejandro Colomar
2022-12-31  8:50 ` Theo de Raadt
2022-12-31  8:51   ` Theo de Raadt
2022-12-31 14:56     ` Alejandro Colomar
2022-12-31 15:13       ` Alejandro Colomar
2022-12-31 15:17         ` Alejandro Colomar
2022-12-31 15:59         ` Alejandro Colomar
2022-12-31 16:03           ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-01-01  8:41           ` Theo de Raadt
2022-12-31 23:07   ` Damien Miller
2022-12-31 23:58     ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-01-01  7:48       ` Ariadne Conill
2023-01-01  9:21         ` Otto Moerbeek
2023-01-01 14:05         ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-01-01  8:34       ` Theo de Raadt
2023-01-01 21:37 ` Arsen Arsenović
2023-01-01 23:50   ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-01-02  0:02     ` Arsen Arsenović
2023-01-02 11:24       ` Alejandro Colomar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221231023653.41877-1-alx@kernel.org \
    --to=alx.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=Todd.Miller@sudo.ws \
    --cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=alx@kernel.org \
    --cc=crrodriguez@opensuse.org \
    --cc=deraadt@theos.com \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=ydroneaud@opteya.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).