public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org>
To: Sergey Bugaev <bugaevc@gmail.com>
Cc: bug-hurd@gnu.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
	"Flávio Cruz" <flaviocruz@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH mig 7/12] Drop -undef -ansi from cpp flags
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 19:44:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230212184439.y3lpv2fy7korek3l@begin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230212111044.610942-8-bugaevc@gmail.com>

Applied, thanks!

Sergey Bugaev, le dim. 12 févr. 2023 14:10:38 +0300, a ecrit:
> Since GNU Mach commit d30481122a5d24ad6b921062f93b9172ef922fc3,
> i386/machine_types.defs defines types based on defined(__x86_64__).
> Supressing the built-in macro definitions will now result in the wrong
> type being silently selected.
> 
> -undef was initially introduced in commit
> 78b6a7665db7b2eae367e17102821cbdca231d19 without much of an explanation.
> -ansi was introduced in commit 6940fb91859e46b2e96a331a029f2dc2a0ee51c9
> "to avoid -Di386=1 and the like".
> 
> Since glibc has been using MIG with CPP set to a custom GCC invocation
> which did *not* use either flag, it appears that everything works well
> enough even without them. On the other hand, not having __x86_64__
> defined most definetely causes issues for anything that does not set a
> custom CPP when invoking MIG (i.e., most users). Other built-in
> definitions could be used in the future in a similar way (e.g. on other
> architectures); it's really more of a coincidence that they have not
> been used until now, and things kept working with -undef.
> ---
>  mig.in | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mig.in b/mig.in
> index 63e0269..94fd500 100644
> --- a/mig.in
> +++ b/mig.in
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ migcom=${MIGDIR-$libexecdir}/${MIGCOM-@MIGCOM@}
>  # The expansion of TARGET_CC might refer to ${CC}, so make sure it is defined.
>  default_cc="@CC@"
>  CC="${CC-${default_cc}}"
> -default_cpp="@TARGET_CC@ -E -x c -undef -ansi"
> +default_cpp="@TARGET_CC@ -E -x c"
>  cpp="${CPP-${default_cpp}}"
>  
>  cppflags=
> -- 
> 2.39.1
> 
> 

-- 
Samuel
---
Pour une évaluation indépendante, transparente et rigoureuse !
Je soutiens la Commission d'Évaluation de l'Inria.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-12 18:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-12 11:10 [RFC PATCH 0/12] Towards glibc on x86_64-gnu Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 1/12] hurd: Refactor readlinkat() Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 14:49   ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 2/12] hurd: Use mach_msg_type_number_t where appropriate Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 14:52   ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 3/12] mach, hurd: Cast through uintptr_t Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 14:55   ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 4/12] hurd: Fix xattr error value Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 14:56   ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 5/12] htl: Fix semaphore reference Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 14:57   ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH hurd 6/12] hurd: Fix modes_t and speeds_t types on 64-bit Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 15:00   ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 15:15     ` Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 15:22       ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 16:13         ` Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 16:30           ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 19:03           ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH mig 7/12] Drop -undef -ansi from cpp flags Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 15:01   ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 18:43     ` Flávio Cruz
2023-02-12 18:44   ` Samuel Thibault [this message]
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH mig 8/12] Set max type alignment to sizeof(long) Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 9/12] mach: Look for mach_i386.defs on x86_64 too Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 15:07   ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 15:38     ` Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 15:46       ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 16:01         ` Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-16 20:22   ` Joseph Myers
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 10/12] hurd: Set up the basic tree for x86_64-gnu Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 15:15   ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 11/12] hurd, htl: Add some x86_64-specific code Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 16:11   ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 16:25     ` Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 16:36       ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 16:40         ` Florian Weimer
2023-02-12 16:46           ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 19:29             ` Florian Weimer
2023-02-12 19:37               ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 16:51         ` Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 17:02           ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 17:06             ` Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 12/12] C11 thrd: Downgrade the default alignment of mtx_t Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 15:18   ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 15:52     ` Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 16:29       ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 0/12] Towards glibc on x86_64-gnu Samuel Thibault

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230212184439.y3lpv2fy7korek3l@begin \
    --to=samuel.thibault@gnu.org \
    --cc=bug-hurd@gnu.org \
    --cc=bugaevc@gmail.com \
    --cc=flaviocruz@gmail.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).