public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Bugaev <bugaevc@gmail.com>
To: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org>
Cc: bug-hurd@gnu.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
	"Flávio Cruz" <flaviocruz@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH glibc 9/12] mach: Look for mach_i386.defs on x86_64 too
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 18:38:03 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAN9u=HeCOHKP8M4foPCPYFtwCKH1kkBgx9+4DCOP1pgFORQmpg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230212150710.zuzw5nqdtwvflkrj@begin>

> >  # Translate GNU names for CPUs into the names used in Mach header files.
> > -mach-machine = $(patsubst powerpc,ppc,$(base-machine))
> > +mach-machine := $(patsubst powerpc,ppc,$(base-machine))
> > +mach-machine := $(patsubst x86_64,i386,$(mach-machine))
>
> Mmm, no, it's not actually a translation. What exactly does this fix?

The only thing the mach-machine variable is used for (as the comment
above it kind of explains) is for guessing the include guard name in
the machine-specific Mach header. They need this because, uh,

For generating mach-syscalls.mk, the build system passes '#include
<mach/syscall_sw.h>' to the compiler to be macro-expanded.
<mach/syscall_sw.h> contains lines like
kernel_trap(mach_msg_trap,-25,7), and at the very top, this:

/*
 *      The machine-dependent "syscall_sw.h" file should
 *      define a macro for
 *              kernel_trap(trap_name, trap_number, arg_count)
 *      which will expand into assembly code for the
 *      trap.
 *
 *      N.B.: When adding calls, do not put spaces in the macros.
 */
#include <mach/machine/syscall_sw.h>

So when using <mach/syscall_sw.h> normally, those kernel_trap() macros
get expanded into arch-specific assembly definitions, such as on i386:

#define kernel_trap(trap_name,trap_number,number_args) \
ENTRY(trap_name) \
        movl    $ trap_number,%eax; \
        SVC; \
        ret; \
END(trap_name)

Now back to the glibc buildsystem and the generation of
mach-syscalls.mk: the glibc buildsystem preprocesses
<mach/syscall_sw.h> (the one that contains all those kernel_trap ()
"calls") with the -D_MACH_`echo $(mach-machine) | tr a-z
A-Z`_SYSCALL_SW_H_=1 incantation. This expands to something like
-D_MACH_I386_SYSCALL_SW_H_, which "fakes" the include guard of the
<mach/machine/syscall_sw.h>! So those kernel_trap () "calls" do not
get expanded, and the glibc buildsystem then postprocesses them with a
sed invocation to strip those kernel_trap () calls:

sed -n -e 's/^kernel_trap(\(.*\),\([-0-9]*\),\([0-9]*\))$$/\1 \2 \3/p'

And *that* (faking the include guard) is what the mach-machine
variable is used for. As another comment there says, "Go kludges!!!"

Since mach/machine/syscall_sw.h is the i386 version on x86_64 (or --
is it not supposed to be?), the _MACH_I386_SYSCALL_SW_H_ guard is the
one to fake, hence setting mach-machine to i386.

P.S. As you can see, even when the patch is a simple one-line change,
there can be quite a story (and some pulled hairs) behind it :)

> To build a 64bit glibc, we'll use headers installed by a 64bit gnumach,
> i.e. into /usr/include/x86_64-gnu/

Yes, sure, I'm building with the headers from the 64-bit Mach (gnumach
master configured with --host=x86_64-gnu).

Sergey

> I have applied the rest, thanks!
>
> Samuel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-12 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-12 11:10 [RFC PATCH 0/12] Towards glibc on x86_64-gnu Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 1/12] hurd: Refactor readlinkat() Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 14:49   ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 2/12] hurd: Use mach_msg_type_number_t where appropriate Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 14:52   ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 3/12] mach, hurd: Cast through uintptr_t Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 14:55   ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 4/12] hurd: Fix xattr error value Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 14:56   ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 5/12] htl: Fix semaphore reference Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 14:57   ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH hurd 6/12] hurd: Fix modes_t and speeds_t types on 64-bit Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 15:00   ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 15:15     ` Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 15:22       ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 16:13         ` Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 16:30           ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 19:03           ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH mig 7/12] Drop -undef -ansi from cpp flags Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 15:01   ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 18:43     ` Flávio Cruz
2023-02-12 18:44   ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH mig 8/12] Set max type alignment to sizeof(long) Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 9/12] mach: Look for mach_i386.defs on x86_64 too Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 15:07   ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 15:38     ` Sergey Bugaev [this message]
2023-02-12 15:46       ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 16:01         ` Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-16 20:22   ` Joseph Myers
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 10/12] hurd: Set up the basic tree for x86_64-gnu Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 15:15   ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 11/12] hurd, htl: Add some x86_64-specific code Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 16:11   ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 16:25     ` Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 16:36       ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 16:40         ` Florian Weimer
2023-02-12 16:46           ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 19:29             ` Florian Weimer
2023-02-12 19:37               ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 16:51         ` Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 17:02           ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 17:06             ` Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 12/12] C11 thrd: Downgrade the default alignment of mtx_t Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 15:18   ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 15:52     ` Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 16:29       ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 0/12] Towards glibc on x86_64-gnu Samuel Thibault

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAN9u=HeCOHKP8M4foPCPYFtwCKH1kkBgx9+4DCOP1pgFORQmpg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=bugaevc@gmail.com \
    --cc=bug-hurd@gnu.org \
    --cc=flaviocruz@gmail.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=samuel.thibault@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).