From: Sergey Bugaev <bugaevc@gmail.com>
To: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org>
Cc: bug-hurd@gnu.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
"Flávio Cruz" <flaviocruz@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH glibc 9/12] mach: Look for mach_i386.defs on x86_64 too
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 19:01:13 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAN9u=He=iVYW8GiAjpXPKfpdd-CJn9mNVOHD5hYDy2hOuq-xAQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230212154623.3f7qppulbp33fth7@begin>
On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 6:46 PM Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Sergey Bugaev, le dim. 12 févr. 2023 18:38:03 +0300, a ecrit:
> > Since mach/machine/syscall_sw.h is the i386 version on x86_64 (or --
> > is it not supposed to be?)
>
> Nobody yet decided that the system call interface would be the same on
> i386 and on x86_64 :)
>
> Most probably we'll need a different header, to put the trap number of
> rax instead of eax, notably. And the systemcall instruction will most
> probably not be an lcall.
>
> > the _MACH_I386_SYSCALL_SW_H_ guard is the one to fake, hence setting
> > mach-machine to i386.
>
> This can be already fixed by shipping a different file in mach, as we'll
> most probably want in the end anyway.
I've kind of assumed that the x86_64 Mach using / installing the i386
headers is intentional, and if some things (like the actual syscall
ABI) are to be different, they'd both be defined in the same file,
predicated on an ifdef. This is what XNU does for sure, see
osfmk/mach/i386/syscall_sw.h
Sergey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-12 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-12 11:10 [RFC PATCH 0/12] Towards glibc on x86_64-gnu Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 1/12] hurd: Refactor readlinkat() Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 14:49 ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 2/12] hurd: Use mach_msg_type_number_t where appropriate Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 14:52 ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 3/12] mach, hurd: Cast through uintptr_t Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 14:55 ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 4/12] hurd: Fix xattr error value Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 14:56 ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 5/12] htl: Fix semaphore reference Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 14:57 ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH hurd 6/12] hurd: Fix modes_t and speeds_t types on 64-bit Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 15:00 ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 15:15 ` Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 15:22 ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 16:13 ` Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 16:30 ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 19:03 ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH mig 7/12] Drop -undef -ansi from cpp flags Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 15:01 ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 18:43 ` Flávio Cruz
2023-02-12 18:44 ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH mig 8/12] Set max type alignment to sizeof(long) Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 9/12] mach: Look for mach_i386.defs on x86_64 too Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 15:07 ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 15:38 ` Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 15:46 ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 16:01 ` Sergey Bugaev [this message]
2023-02-16 20:22 ` Joseph Myers
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 10/12] hurd: Set up the basic tree for x86_64-gnu Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 15:15 ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 11/12] hurd, htl: Add some x86_64-specific code Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 16:11 ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 16:25 ` Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 16:36 ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 16:40 ` Florian Weimer
2023-02-12 16:46 ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 19:29 ` Florian Weimer
2023-02-12 19:37 ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 16:51 ` Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 17:02 ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 17:06 ` Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 12/12] C11 thrd: Downgrade the default alignment of mtx_t Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 15:18 ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 15:52 ` Sergey Bugaev
2023-02-12 16:29 ` Samuel Thibault
2023-02-12 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 0/12] Towards glibc on x86_64-gnu Samuel Thibault
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAN9u=He=iVYW8GiAjpXPKfpdd-CJn9mNVOHD5hYDy2hOuq-xAQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=bugaevc@gmail.com \
--cc=bug-hurd@gnu.org \
--cc=flaviocruz@gmail.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=samuel.thibault@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).